Preview

Jury Selection

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1223 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jury Selection
Jury Selection

Christina Coyle

Strayer University

May 9, 2010

Every American that has registered to vote or has a drivers license can at any time be called to serve on a jury. There are mixed feelings about being called for duty. Some Americans see it as a nuisance that will disrupt their lives. Others see it as an opportunity to serve their country. Being called to serve, and actually serving is two different matters. A jury is ultimately selected by the judge, prosecutor and defending attorney. How they are they picked? How are they released? Maybe this paper will answer a few of these questions.

The selection of a jury is the process that occurs right before the actual trial, and after the trial initiation and the arraignment and plea. Only about 10 percent of actual arraignments see an actual trial, because 90 percent of cases that are preparing for trial end up accepting a plea bargain (Schmalleher, 2009).

Any one who is accused of a crime and will stand trial is allowed by the Sixth Amendment the right to an impartial jury. For a jury to be impartial, it is not always true that they have no prior knowledge of the case at all. In the case of a highly publicized trial, it can be almost impossible to find 12 people who know nothing about the case at hand or the accused. Some jurors will be excused based on how suitable they are judged to be for the case, and some may be excused because of reasons beyond their control (Schmalleger, 2009). I have been called to serve jury duty one time in my life. At the time I had 2 small children at home, one of them just being diagnosed with the Swine Flu 2 days prior. When I told the judge this, he told me not to touch anyone on the way out of courtroom, and wished my child well. It was not that I didn’t want to serve; I felt my place was with my child, and was glad the judge agreed.

After the judge has done his initial weeding out of people who have been called to serve within 2 years, people who have



Cited: Jury Selection (2009). American Judicature Society. Retrieved May 9, 2010, from http://www.ajs.org/jc/juries/jc_whoserves_selection.asp Meet the Jury for Scott Peterson (2005, June 4). Find Laci 2003. Retrieved May 9, 2010, from http://www.findlaci2003.us/jurorsFinal-6men-6women.html Schmalleger, F (2009). Criminal Justice Today. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Scott Peterson Trial Summary (2010). Peterson Trial.info. Retrieved May 9, 2010, from http://petersontrial.info/scott-peterson-summary.php

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Step one in a jury trial is Jury selection. In this step about forty individuals are selected to be possible jury members. Each individual is questioned and examined so they can weed through and pick the ones that would fit this jury trial. This is to make sure the individuals are not prejudice, or related to or know the criminal. This process…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To serve on a jury you have to be 18 years or older, be able to speak English, be able to read and write in the English language, be mentality sound, and some felony convictions. (Mulvaney, M. D., & Little Jr., J. A. 2015). In order to get on a jury panel, the prosecuting attorney, defense attorney, and judge start the dismissal process. Jurors can be excused from the jury panel by way of challenges. There are two challenges, challenges for cause and preemptory. In order to remove a juror for cause all parties must agree that the juror may be excused based on the existing court rules. Some jurors may have a hardship or family emergency that may prevent them from serving; this would qualify under the court rules as a reason for dismissal for cause.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law greatly reflects moral and ethical standards in relation to the use of juries as juries ensure an accused is judged by their peers and members of the community, however, the selection process in a jury can also result in a jury which does not fully reflect community standards. Under the Jury Act 1977 (NSW), any Australian citizen may be called to serve on a jury, and citizens are randomly selected from the electoral roll. This means that the jury is essentially a representation of the community and its interests, thus, enabling the views and opinions of society to be upheld when deciding a verdict. It also allows an accused to be judged by their peers and fellow citizens, instead of a judge, who may not be in touch with the ethical…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Everyone dreads Jury duty. Jury duty is commonly known as a nuisance that gets in the way of our everyday lives. When one types in the words “jury duty” into the google search bar that individual finds the first few search results to be “get out of jury duty” or “jury duty excuses”. However, we fail to realize that the role of a juror is essential to the United States justice system, we also fail to realize that every single juror counts. We often hear of jurors conforming, and switching their votes to the majority vote in hopes of going home, but this is not the case in “12 Angry Men”. In Sidney Lumet’s feature film “12 Angry Men”, we are given insight to the pressures of social psychology and how one man strives to overcome and change it.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jury Annotated Bibliography

    • 2432 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "Analysis of the Media 's Influence on the Jury." Justice for America. N.p., 2 Nov. 2007. Web. 2…

    • 2432 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury nullification is a right enjoyed, but not understood, by all jurors in the US. This right gives jurors the ability to interpret laws for themselves and return not-guilty verdicts for guilty defendants allowing them to nullify laws. (Emal, 1995) The most common admonishment by judges is that jurors must decide the case based on facts, and that they are not in fact interpreting the fairness…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If life truly is what you or we the people make it than we are all guilty of negligence and selfish immaturity. The existence of our civil liberty is under constant threat and that is something that should never be allowed to go on with such neglect. Laws should not only protect the rights, freedoms, and safety of the people but also should enhance the civil liberty of those who are expected to uphold such laws. This is why we have a jury and this is why the jury possesses the power of responsibility to protect civil liberty at all costs. The handbook for trial jurors serving in the United States District Courts clearly states and touches on the importance of jury service. It says that jurors maintain a vital role in our justice system and the protection of our rights and liberties is largely achieved through the teamwork of judge and jury who, working together in a common effort, put into practice the principles of our great heritage of freedom. It also goes on to say the judge determines the law to be applied in the case while the jury decides the facts. Thus, in a very important way, jurors become a part of the court itself. Jurors must be men and women possessed of sound judgment, absolute honesty, and a complete sense of fairness. Jury service is a high duty of citizenship. Jurors aid in the maintenance of law and order and uphold justice among their fellow citizens. In addition to determining and adjusting property rights, jurors may also be asked to decide questions involving a crime for which a person may be fined, placed on probation, or confined in prison. In a very real sense, therefore, the people must rely upon jurors…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The juror’s recognized and valued that they were participating in a key pillar of democracy, a fair and unbiased jury. Juror #11 mentions the importance of this, saying to the jury that “This is a remarkable thing about democracy. That we are…ummmm… what is the word… Ah, notified! That we are notified by mail to come down to this place and decide on the guilt or innocence of a man we have not known before.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Trial Research Paper

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The advantage of having a trial by jury allows a sort of "second trial." For example, in the movie Twelve Angry Men, every single jury member voted guilty, except for one. The other eleven men demanded his reasons for voting Not Guilty, and he gave them. In the end, they voted Not Guilty unanimously. Now, the defendant in question was charged with murder, to which the penalty was death by electrocution. However, the evidence, which most of the jury members did not question, was not as sound as they thought, and the man that voted Not guilty showed them that. If the defendant hadn't had a jury, then he would have been sentenced to death, whether he was guilty or not, due to the meager and circumstantial evidence…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    juries

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juries are a panel of citizens selected randomly from the electoral role to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused, thus are a fundamental part of how the adversarial system functions. The right to a trial by jury is enshrined by the right to a fair trial. Juries enable a fair trial as they are members of the community who are making an impartial judgement based on what the two opposing sides presents to them, hence they are less prone to bias and bigoted views enabling them to improve access to justice. When a verdict is made, it is often made unanimously so there should be no doubt on the jurors mine as to whether the accused is guilty or not. There are some circumstances, when a majority verdict takes place 11 against 1 or 10 against 1, but only if deliberation has surpassed a reasonable time ( usually 8 hours ), so this allows for a fairer system. Being such a fundamental part of the adversarial system, if a jury is unable to make a verdict, it becomes a hung jury in which the case is dismissed and a retrial is ordered therefore ensuring that there is an equal opportunity for each party to present their side of the case and know that an impartial judgement will be made. Overall, since the right to a fair trial is significant in the adversary system, the juries are a pivotal reason as to how natural justice is achieved.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A jury is most likely to acquit a defendant when members of the jury are sympathetic toward the defendant or disfavor the law under which the charges fall. Cases continue to exist, however, in which a juror's desire not to convict is for racial reasons. Some argue that after a long history of all White juries acquitting defendants who committed crimes against African Americans –and in a system in which African Americans have a higher likelihood of arrest and conviction –jury nullification can be a political tool in the face of a discriminatory process.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In United States, the protection of rights and liberties in federal courts is achieved through the teamwork of judge and jury. The people don´t need any knowledge (ˈnɒlɪdʒ) of the legal system to be a juror. There are two types of juries in the federal trial courts: trial juries (also known as petit juries), and grand juries.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Jury in Crown Court usually deals with criminal trials consists of 12 members. A jury is used normally when the defendant pleads not guilty. However, jurors are considered passive as they would not cross examine the defendant and the plaintiffs. The trial is presided over by a judge who will decides the points of law and the jury will consider the facts and evidence raised in the court and make a verdict. Very often, jurors are not legal professionals, hence the judge has the power to direct the jury to acquit the defendant if he believes that, in the point of legal reasoning, the prosecution’s evidence has not made out a case against the defendant. This usually occurs close to 10% of the 20000 cases each year.…

    • 619 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For over one thousand years the jury system has been in place in the legal system, which to some can seem bizarre to ask twelves random people with no training or experience in this field to decide someone else’s fate . At first the use of the jury was providing local knowledge and acting more like witnesses rather than the decision makers that they are seen as today. They are now independent assessors of deciding fact.…

    • 1657 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Trial in Malaysia

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A jury trial is a trial where a judge is helped by a jury which consists of several ordinary citizens whom are usually selected randomly and generally laymen. Usually the jury box consists of 12 people that will judge regarding the facts of a case. In a jury trial, the selections of the juries are called ‘voir dire’, where the judge or parties ask jurors questions in order to determine their biases and opinions. After the jury is chosen and sworn in, the parties shall give their opening arguments, present their evidence and give closing arguments. The jury then discusses the facts of the case and considers whatever deems necessary only to announce the verdict at the end. According to Ng Boon Siong in his article of “The Comparison of Trial by Jury and Trial without Jury in The Malaysian Legal System”, the jury trial was first introduced in Penang and Malacca and later extended by the first Prime Minister throughout the rest of Malaya states. After the last case of Mona Fandey then only it was realized that jury trials are not suitable to be applied in Malaysia. Several of those reason is that firstly, the jury trial are considered archaic and time consuming. Not to mention the difficulties of such common people (whom most of them does not have any legal knowledge) to understand fully the facts of the case which adds up the time taken for an acceptable and at least reasonable decision to be made. Besides that, most of the jurors are being doubtful most of the time during the trial. They decide solely based upon personal opinion rather than considering wholly on the evidences founded. For example in the case of Mona Fandey, biased opinions was obvious at that time because all of the jurors voted the defendant as guilty without considering some evidence which are in favour of the defendant side. Lastly, jurors are incapable and mostly afraid to bear the heavy burden of such big decision where a man’s life is at stake. However, it has been 15…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics