Preview

Just War and Pacifism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
402 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Just War and Pacifism
Just War

The just war theory is a largely Christian philosophy that attempts to reconcile three things: * taking human life is seriously wrong * states have a duty to defend their citizens, and defend justice * protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values sometimes requires willingness to use force and violence
There are six conditions that must be satisfied for a war to be considered just: * The war must be for a just cause. * The war must be lawfully declared by a lawful authority. * The intention behind the war must be good. * All other ways of resolving the problem should have been tried first. * There must be a reasonable chance of success. * The means used must be in proportion to the end that the war seeks to achieve. The way Just War has to be fought: * No innocent people can be harmed. * No fighters or combatants can also be involved or harmed in the process.

Purpose * The aim of Just War Theory is to provide a guide to the right way for states to act in potential conflict situations. It only applies to states, and not to individuals (although an individual can use the theory to help them decide whether it is morally right to take part in a particular war). * Just War Theory provides a useful framework for individuals and political groups to use for their discussions of possible wars. * The theory is not intended to justify wars but to prevent them, by showing that going to war except in certain limited circumstances is wrong, and thus motivate states to find other ways of resolving conflicts.
Information above obtained from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/war/just/introduction.shtml
Pacifists are often thought of as totally opposed to killing, but they don't have to be. A pacifist can logically support euthanasia and abortion, although they would need to have thought their position through very carefully.
Types of pacifism

Absolute pacifism: An absolute

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    POL.355.Final.Paper

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Just War Theory evolves from three ideas; jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum. Jus ad bellum means justice for war, that is what the motive behind going into war is? This first part concentrates on the reasons why states use war as a means in which to achieve a justifiable end. Jus in bello means justice in war, deals with the means used in the actual war which is normally the soldiers’ responsibility. The last idea used in just war theory is Jus post bellum which means justice after war; this involves the consequences of war.…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powder Keg Myth Essay

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    • Preemptive war is a central prediction of the spiral model of war and an important component of offense-defense theory, two leading theories of the causes of war.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Just War In Vietnam

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The focus of this investigation is the theory or concept of just war, and what makes a just war “Just.” This investigation will explore the question: To what extent can the Vietnam War be justified as a just war? Throughout this investigation, the philosophy of a just war will be broken down into its fundamental components. The purpose of this is to identify the extent of which…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first three conditions necessary for a just war were listed by Aquinas which included right authority, just cause and just intention. These and…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Success: Military force must have a reasonable chance of success. Lives may not be sacrificed in futile causes.…

    • 2398 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Just War theory tries to judge whether it is ‘just’ to go to war and how the war should be fought. It tries to reconcile three things; taking a human life is seriously wrong. That states have a duty to defend their citizens and defend justice and thirdly protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Force should be used when there are legitimate reasons for using it, and when it is the last resort for the government, who is responsible for civic peace. Elshtain uses Augustine to discuss justice and war. A paradox between war and peace is introduced, Elshtain uses an Augustine quote to discuss the similarity of two words that are complete polar opposites, “Peace and war had a contest in cruelty, and peace won the prize.” In history, there are many instances where evil and horrible things are done in the name of ‘peace’. Elshtain continues with the early Christian beliefs that under Jesus’ teaches forbid force in anyway, even under authority. Later, it transforms to the necessity of force to protect others. This leads to the four qualifications that Elshtain wrote to justify a war, the first is that the war must be publicly declared by a legitimate jurisdiction. The second criteria is that an unjust violence must have occurred against the government’s own people or a defenseless group. Third, the war has to be start with the proper motives. Finally, all other alternatives must be exhausted before leading to war. In the end, Elshtain includes a final criteria that must be met for a war to be ‘just’, the possibility of actually winning the conflict. If there is no chance of succeeding, the conflict should not be…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jus a bellum, the right to go to war, explicitly describes how a nation-state should conduct itself before preparing for war. There are seven sub-categories within Jus a bellum: Just Cause, Comparative Justice, Competent Authority, Right Intention, Profitability of Success, Last Resort, and Proportionality. Just Cause is explained as needing to have a reason to go to war. Not just for recapturing material possessions, but if lives are in danger. Comparative Justice is described, as the suffering and injustice on one side within a war must outweigh the suffering and injustice on the opposite side. Competent Authority must be in order within a war. Nation-states that start war must only start it if the authorities within the nation-state are focused on justice. Right Intention is defined as; force may be only used for a just cause correcting a suffered wrong. Gaining or maintaining economies by a nation-state is not considered just. Profitability of Success indicates that arms are not to be used where unbalanced measures are pertinent to be successful. The Last Resort category is presented as; force in war may only be used if peaceful alternatives have been completely depleted. The final category, Proportionality, is the foreseen benefits of starting war must be proportionate to its expected wrongs.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a citizen of the United States, I am part of an institution that has been, and is currently, killing people. Whether or not all or some of these killings are ethically defensible is a difficult question to answer and most people simply never confront the issue. I will evaluate literature on the topic, identify the different justifications for killing in time of war and decide if they legitimize our actions. After describing some compelling arguments, I will defend my own position that pacifism is the only ideal which mankind should embrace.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the conflict uses conventional warfare, it is not categorized as just war because it does not fit into all of the five categories that define when war is just. First of all, it is a preventive war rather than a last resort or preemptive war. Second, it also is not a last resort and does not have a just cause.…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does Just War Exist

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. The treatment of a losing nation after a war by the winning nation must be just…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Just war” is war that is morally and religiously acceptable; it displays all three criteria that makes war justifiable. The first is that war must be waged by those who hold supreme authority. The second is that the war must have a justifiable cause and not just to show power. The third is that everyone should have the right intentions and peace should be an intention. “Just war” helps express that all wars are not sinful.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War Theory Essay

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Just war theory is a set of normative principles that determines when military force is just (jus ad bellum principles) and how war can be executed (jus in bello principle). Although war is generally characterized as aggressive, destructive, and morbid, there are basic principles that ought to guide the conduct during wartime. Under jus ad bellum, the most important principle is that war must have a just cause. This means that the causes that resort to military force must be appropriate. For the war to be just, the war must be declared by a legitimate authority, be of last resort, seek peace as the future goal, violence be proportional to the harm it inflicts, have the right intention and have reasonable chance of success.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics