Preview

Juvenile Court Cases Case Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1595 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juvenile Court Cases Case Study
Introduction After analyzing dozens of proposed state amendments that have been a part of recent Florida elections, I began to notice patterns in the decisions and began studying the process. The amendment proposals I viewed had been passed, denied, and even overturned by the courts. First I viewed the debate and proposed 2014 amendment of medical marijuana in the Politics in Florida book (Ch. 2, Pg. 58). After, I viewed another 2014 amendment that was less debated upon, being the Water and Land Conservation (Ch. 9, Pg. 300). Lastly I took a slightly different approach in selecting the Florida Marriage Protection Amendment, as this issue was heavily involved in the court system. Instead of analyzing the amendments themselves my goal was …show more content…
Published on January 26, 2016. http://www.publicnewsservice.org/2016-01-26/juvenile-justice/scotus-offers-hope-for-juvenile-offenders-sentenced-to-life-in-prison/a50022-2

Summary: This past Monday a ruling was upheld by the Supreme Court from 2012 baring the immediate life sentences for juveniles. In the past this has been an issue in Florida, with one of the nationwide highest crime rates for those under the age of 18. Last year the Florida Supreme Court ruled unanimously that all juveniles convicted of homicide who received automatic life sentences must be resentenced under a state law passed in 2014. The U.S. Supreme Court ruling Monday could have had an effect on the Florida Constitution was crucial news for anyone affected by this law.

Connection to this Module: This module contained a great deal of information overall and the section that pertains most to the topic would be, Amending the Constitution (Ch. 2, Pg. 54). Court ruling is a popular way to amend the Florida constitution because it is arguably less difficult than going through the other necessary processes. This article is a perfect example of the strong power the Florida courts have, along with the power the U.S. Supreme Court has on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Juliana has been attending school however, spends much of the school day in the office because she is unable to stay in the classroom for greater than 30 minutes. On 5/5/2017, I was called by Ms. Kathleen Seward, Principal at the West Somerville Neighborhood School. Ms. Seward reported she called the Crisis Team to come to the school as Juliana was "out of control" and had attempted to lock herself in a locker, and when approached assaulted a staff member. Juliana was evaluated and was sent home. Due to this incident , the School placed a para-profession in the classroom with Juliana as the school is concerned for her safety.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On January 13, 1999, tragedy struck when Hae Min Lee went missing after what seemed to be a normal day at Woodlawn High School in Baltimore, Maryland. Then on February 9, 1999, Lee’s body was found buried in Leakin Park, just a seven minute drive from the high school. Lee’s former boyfriend, Adnan Syed, was seventeen at the time of the murder and attended the same school as Lee. They had an on-and-off relationship that officially ended in December of their senior year, just one month before her disappearance. Syed remained the prime suspect in the case and was arrested on February 28, 1999 and charged with first-degree murder. Throughout the trial, the prosecution claimed that Syed was so broken after the break-up, that he murdered Lee out of rage. Lee’s diary was brought in as evidence as she wrote about Syed’s behavior after the break up and details of their relationship. The prosecution also summoned a witness that spoke of Syed’s suspicious behavior, leading up to and after the murder. There were several pieces of key evidence and convincing claims presented in the 1999-2000 trial. The prosecution’s work convinced the jury to produce Syed’s guilty verdict, sentencing him to life in prison.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State constitutions, however, tend to show deviation from the structure of federal rule maintained by the U.S. Constitution. In the case of the Nevada State Constitution, there is ample evidence that this document sets forth a policy of law that is far more “democratic” in tone and in application than the Constitution. There are strong similarities between the two documents. Both, for example, stress the rights of the citizenry and even focus on issues such as the “right to assemble” and the citizenry’s ability to refuse to quarter citizens in their homes upon order from the government. Yet when the workings of the legislative, executive, and judicial systems are investigated, it is clear that Nevada’s state constitution deviates dramatically from the U.S. Constitution. While both share these three separate designations of political power, and while there is the unstated intention that these branches are intended to keep the other within check, there are differences which suggest a greater degree of democratic control over each area therein.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The state of Florida is amongst 16 other states that selects judges through the method “appointment-retention election”. A method in which a proposing group shows names to the governor, who then makes the appointment; appointees need to win a retention vote in the next election. It is not necessarily a good system because the selection is placed in the hands of the judges or attorneys who comprise the nominating committee and the governor, with only a impression of voter input. Reorganizers argue that the plan eliminate judges from politics and saves the electorate the problem of voting on judicial candidates when they know little about their professional qualifications.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Illinois Juvenile Court Act of 1899 created a juvenile court that had jurisdiction over children charged with crimes. But, in addition, the new juvenile court was given jurisdiction over:…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One pro of this Article is the fact that the executive branch, or the President, does not have an official role in the amendment process. He cannot veto a proposed amendment. This limitation to power, an example of the system of ‘check and balances’ so central to the philosophy of the Constitution, prevents the President from engaging in self-serving ratification.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Costello, G.A., Killian, J.H., & Thomas, K.R. (Ed.). (2002). The Constitution of the united states…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is now a minimum requirement to enter Florida’s political scene. The House of Representatives requires residency in the district, a high school diploma and no felonies. To top off it all off is the introduction of the two term limit, which I believe will prevent corruption. The Senate is reserved for the elite; not only will a contender have ten years of continuous residency within his or her district but they must hold a graduate degree to run for the office of the senate; best of all, the senator will receive loan forgiveness for their service. The best adaptation to the Florida legislative branch is the new Court of Citizens. The Court of Citizens exists to create another layer of checks and balances. With its own set of requirements, the Court of Citizens prevents incompetent and unmotivated individuals from seeking office. Adding another branch of government does promote big government, but it holds the legislative and executive branches…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notably, it is crucial to understand that within the state of Texas, the Supreme Court, the court of criminal appeals and other district courts offer vacancies for judges whose practice of law is meant to resolve any conflict that arises in due course (Mott, 49). It is a constitutional requirement for the selection of nine judges of the Supreme Court, nine justices to preside over the court of criminal appeals and an additional 80 judges who fill the various courts of appeal across the state of Texas (Hansberger, 121). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the Texas is counted among the two members of the union that takes part in the partisan election and re-election of judges in which case the voters have an option of casting a straight-ticket…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I will explain why Texas should retain the partisan election of judges. Texas is one of the few states that choose their judges using a Partisan voting method. Partisan elections can be unreliable and deceitful. A high legal position such as a judge should never be chosen in such a manner. Judges are not chosen based on merit or skills.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In 1917, Minnesota created its juvenile justice system with the goal of protecting and caring for juveniles. The Minnesota Supreme Court interpreted the state's right to "step in and save the child" as more important than the juvenile's right to freedom. Consistent with this parental role, Minnesota designed its juvenile justice system based on the rehabilitative philosophy which held that the juvenile justice system was "designed to secure the welfare of delinquent children and not to punish them." The courts recognized that there were "many wayward, incorrigible, and neglected children" who needed to be "humanely cared for, guided into paths of rectitude and right living, and protected from…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When drafting the Constitution of Texas, Texans failed to follow the general guidelines outlined in the Constitution of the United States. The U.S. Constitution is an ideal document in that it gives very comprehensive powers to the different branches. The Texas Constitution, on the other hand, is very painstaking and reflects the political ideology and laws of the time. In order to change the constitution to reflect the new laws; amendments to the constitution were needed. The amendment process is very efficient and quick. In order to propose an…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    did what courts do — it decided the case before it in light of the legislature ' s intent to leave no legally cast vote uncounted….. If we assume—as I do—that the members of that court and the judges who would have carried out its mandate are impartial, its decision does not even raise a colorable federal question.” With this Justice Stevens is saying is that the Florida Supreme Court is doing what it is supposed to do, upholding the laws that it is supposed to, morally and impartially, and that Federal intervention, through the Supreme Court, is not warranted. Justice Ginsburg supports Justice Stevens opinion: “… disagreement with the Florida court ' s interpretation of its own State ' s law does not warrant the conclusion that the justices of that court have legislated. There is no cause here to believe that the members of Florida ' s high court have done less than "their mortal best to discharge their oath of office," and no cause to upset their reasoned interpretation of Florida law...” Justice Breyer adds another opinion in this position: “Despite the reminder that this case involves "an election for the President of the United States," no preeminent legal concern, or practical concern related to legal questions, required this Court to hear this case, let alone to issue a stay that stopped Florida ' s recount process in its…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the period between its proposal in September 1787 and ratification in 1789, the United States Constitution was the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists, those who supported ratification, and Anti-Federalists, those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to be governed by a republic, the constitution included no bill of rights, and the federal judiciary was vaguely defined and could become too powerful. Each of these arguments is worthy of attention as an examination of the debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the proposed Constitution.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays