Preview

Karl Marx and Max Weber

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1673 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx and Max Weber
Karl Marx and Max Weber
Andy Moss
Introduction
Karl Marx and Max Weber are two important names when thinking of sociological theory. Both men had strong views about our society. Weber’s approach to studying social life will be looked at. Then, Weber’s study of rationalization will be the main point of interest. His theory of rationalization showed us why people acted as they did. As with Weber, Marx’s approach to studying social life will be examined. Next, his theory of the capitalist mode of production will be explored. This paper will discuss his theories of the struggles between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, and how they could be solved.
Max Weber
Max Weber was another intelligent thinker of the last century. His areas of study were primarily concerned with social action and rationalization. Social action is how we behave in everyday life. Ritzer says that behavior occurs with little thought, and action is what we do based on a conscious decision (2010:31). He says that Weber was not concerned with behavior that had no thought behind it, such as touching a hot stove and pulling away. “Weber was interested in situations in which people attach meaning to what they do” (Ritzer 2010:31).
Weber’s major concern was rationalization. First, there needs to be a clear definition of what rationalization actually is. A dictionary will define rationalization as applying logic or reason to something. That is what Weber is also trying to do; he is trying to figure out why people do what they do, and what reason do they have for doing that. He lays out for different types of rationality. First there is practical rationality, which Ritzer defines as how we deal with difficulties on a day-to-day basis, and how we find the quickest and easiest way to reach our goal of getting to one point to another. (Ritzer 2010:34).I think what this means is how we deal with daily problems that we face. For example, if class started in thirty minutes, and I was forty minutes away,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author Terrell Carver assesses the Marx’s social theory in his book (Marx’s Social Theory). This is a fascinating account of Terrell Carver about Marx’s social theory. Writer discusses the influence of Marx on almost every discipline of knowledge from aesthetics to theology, including anthropology, geography, jurisprudence, and history, almost all branches of philosophy, political science and psychology.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx Weber was born on April 21, in 1864 in Germany, in a small city named Erfurt and died on June 1920. Actually Weber was not only an economist and a political scientist but also he was one of the three great founders of sociology, with Marx and Durkheim. Those three are known as the fathers of modern sociology. His family played a vital role in his whole life and had great influence on him as his father was a distinguished and well known lawyer and politician and his mother was a religious person who gave him support throughout his work and life. The time when Weber lived was one of the most important in the history of Germany. In 1871 all German states joined up in order to form Germany as a country, or the First Reich as it was known, with Prussia being the leader. It is also worthwhile to be said that after 1870 Germany saw a rapid industrialization taking place. This made it the greatest industrial power in Europe by 1900. All these socio-economical changes affected Weber’s writings.…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing and contrasting Marx and Weber we see that their theoretical approaches seem to be completely different at first. However, we notice subtle similarities in their theoretical approaches that makes the consequences of their arguments. Marx and Weber apply their concept of specialization…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber and Georg Simmel are the dominant classical voices when studying or analyzing the rise of civilization from a more cooperative, collective feudal social order to a modern capitalistic society. All four of these sociological philosophers contributed to the contemporary understanding of the nature of society and social change. Each of them eventually surmised that economic conditions directly influenced the relationship between individuals and their fellows, and individuals and their world. Although they had differences in their viewpoints, they were acutely concerned with the evolving market society and its effect on human interaction. Marx developed his concept of “alienation”, Durkheim expressed thoughts on social solidarity, Weber and Simmel emphasized how the emergence of capitalism affected the way people think, making the rational calculation of means and ends more ubiquitous and placing significant importance on rationalism and disenchantment. The outcome for the modern citizen was not naturally grounded in humanitarianism…

    • 3246 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx and Nietzsche

    • 4031 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Society is flawed. There are critical imbalances in it that cause much of humanity to suffer. In, the most interesting work from this past half-semester, The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx is reacting to this fact by describing his vision of a perfectly balanced society, a communist society. Simply put, a communist society is one where all property is held in common. No one person has more than the other, but rather everyone shares in the fruits of their labors. Marx is writing of this society because, he believes it to be the best form of society possible. He states that communism creates the correct balance between the needs of the individual and the needs of society. And furthermore thinks that sometimes violence is necessary to reach the state of communism. This paper will reflect upon these two topics: the relationship of the individual and society, and the issue of violence, as each is portrayed in the manifesto.…

    • 4031 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Max Weber is well known within sociology as one of the founding fathers. He believes that over-generalisation should be avoided as much as possible and we should understand human action, hence ‘social action theory’. Weber contributed four ideal types that should be used to study particular situations; traditional action, affective action, rational value-oriented action and rational goal-oriented action. Weber’s approach of these four different ideal types led him to methodological individualism, this is a focal point on how people interact in social situations and how these interactions are not determined by a social structure but by the individuals response to the situation that develops society and is what keeps society operating.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Mills

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill suggests that a person's ethical decision-making process should be based solely upon the amount of happiness that the person can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks certain criteria for which happiness can be considered. Happiness should be judged, not only by pleasure, but by pain as well. This paper will examine Mill's position on happiness, and the reasoning behind it. Showing where there are agreements and where there are disagreements will critique the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will reveal what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the guidelines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that one should guide his or her judgements by what will give pleasure. Mill believes that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism also states that the actions of a person should be based upon the "greatest happiness principle". This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill further explores the need for pleasure by noting "a being of higher faculties requires more to make him happy." . He acknowledges that some pleasures are more alluring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing value in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mill's criteria for happiness is easily understood, some statements that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is directly related to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be absurd if someone's goal in life was to be poor and…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Adam Smith and Karl Marx have very different theoretical contributions. Adam Smith proposed that the free market, where producers are free to produce as much as they want and charge customers the prices they want, would result in the most efficient economic outcome for consumers and producers alike due to the. The rationale for his proposal was that each individual would try to maximize his own benefit. In doing so, consumers would only pay as much as or less than they would value the benefit that a good could provide, and producers would only sell for as much as or higher than they would have spent on producing a good. In his optimistic economy, there would be no surplus or demand; markets would always be in equilibrium, and the benefits to consumers and producers alike would be maximized. There would be a limited role for the government in such an economic system.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karl Marx and Max Weber offer two very different but valid approaches to social class in modern capitalist society. In a capitalist society the private ownership of the means of production is the dominant form of providing the things needed to survive. What distinguishes capitalism from other types of society is the emphasis on the rights of property and the individual owner’s right to employ capital, as she or he thinks fit.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prominent Karl Marx’s theory on the division of labor and the social class structure, as outlined by his concept of “the mode of production”, directly relates to social equality, ideology, and social economic power. “The mode of production” is understood to be the basis from which the majority of other social concepts, such as the relations between social classes, political and legal systems, work relations, morality and ideology, and many other phenomena, arise. These social concepts form the superstructure, for which the economic system forms the base. This theory is also related to ordinary people’s struggle for truth, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness also known as “American Dream”.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Case on Social Action

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    key idea that drives action Weber’s interest in social change also leads him to be particularly…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels define class by the attributes of a group of people or members involved. Since industrialized cities were expanding, much of the working class was in poverty. According to Marx, the triumph of one class would pave the way for the future freedom of the rest of society. The wealthy oppressed the slaves, plebeians and laborers. As new technology immersed, market forces gained strength, which allowed the middle classes to gain wealth and power from trade and manufacture. This challenged the upper class authority and the old rulers.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term rationalization is referred to as the replacement of traditions, values and emotions as motivators for behaviour in society with rational calculated ones (H.Jurgen. 1985). One of Weber’s main intellectual concerns was understanding the process of rationalisation and disenchantment that he associated with the rise of capitalism. Although Weber wanted to understand rationalisation he was extremely ambivalent towards it, he argued that it had many advantages such as freeing humans from traditional restrictive and illogical guidance although he also criticises it and argues that rationalisation dehumanises individuals, and identifies it as ‘cogs in the machine’ (Macionis.J 2012) He states that it takes away humans freedom trapping them in the bureaucratic iron cage of rationality and bureaucracy.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx, who had a profound impact in sociology, raised political and economic awareness, Throughout his writings, he explains the effect production has on society and explores the relationships between different social classes. Marx shows the vital role labor plays in social hierarchy and reminds readers of the negative attributes associated with labor. Karl Marx provides commentary on labor and social classes, which is seen in “Alienation and Social Class,” “Classes in Capitalism and Pre-Capitalism,” and “Ideology and Class.”…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2.1 Identify the distinguishing characteristics of sociological theories put forward by Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber…

    • 15158 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays