Preview

Kautilya's Arthasastra : Statecraft

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1213 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kautilya's Arthasastra : Statecraft
Kautilya’s View on Statecraft

Kautilya Arthasastra is a unique treatise on the art of statecraft or governance, wherein every single aspect of human life is subject to the jurisdiction of the state. His detailed work clearly laid down an organization set-up, and there was a clear-cut division of a fix and politics. However, he was of the opinion that politics devoid of ethics is dangerous to prosperity and security of the entire kingdom.

In all matters of state, Dharma should be the guiding factors. In many ways Kautilya was compared to Machiavelli in certain matters of statecraft. The following is a brief explanation of various issues that are part of the entire state machinery :

Tha Saptanga Theory: According to Kautilya, a state has seven elements or constituent, namely, Swamin-the King, Amatya-the Ministers, the Janapada-the Land, and the People, Durga-the Fortres, Kosha the Treasury, Danda-the Army and Mitra-the Allies. This entire set-up of the kingdom was described as Saptanga Theory in ancient India.

The Swamin refers to the king, regarded as the indispensable, integral and inseperable part of the state in ancient India. King in all cases belonged to the noble and royal family who possessed qualities of both head and heart. Amatya or the minister refers to all the official involved in the functioning of the government. It is their responsibility to ensure that the government run smoothly.Janapada implies the land and the people and, according tp Kautilya, must be fertile.

The term Durga in ancient times means fort, which is considered an extremely important element. Usually, forts were constructed on the borders of the territory. Kautilya, in fact, divided these forts into water, hill, desert and forest forts. The fifth element is Kosha or the treasury. Kautilya opined that a king must a mass wealth to promote the welfare of the people and also maintain his army.

Danda refered to the armed forces to protect the state from aggressions and maintain

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    )Compare Lao-tzu’s view of government with of Machiavelli in the next selection. Consider what seem to be the ultimate purposes of government, what seem to the obligations of the leader to the people being led, and what seems to be the main work of the state. What comparisons can you make between Lao-tzu’s Master and Machiavelli’s Prince.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strayer Ch 5 Key Terms

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The system of social organization in India that has evolved over millennia; it is based on an original division of the populace into four inherited classes (varna), with the addition of thousands of social distinctions based on occupation (jatis), which became the main cell of social life in India.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Geography 12b Notes

    • 26113 Words
    • 105 Pages

    Unitary System- One central government runs the nation. Make's laws for the entire nation; Great Britain, and Japan.…

    • 26113 Words
    • 105 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be a state; a government must establish orders, be in control, have a court system, and have a population. I think that the purpose of this article is to inform readers about what it takes to form a state. Fukuyama’s argument is that all tribes will become a state by first possessing a source of authority. Being a state would prevent separation of regions from falling apart or being against each other. States would not hold boundaries based on who's blood is who’s. It would create unity. He also argues that in a social contract, in a time of violence, being a state is the greatest idea because of guaranteed security. Among the tribal societies, they are only secured with limited protection and as for a state there would be unlimited protection because of the rights they give up. I think that Fukuyama is trying to say that when the government is under invasion there would be support and protection at all times. Fukuyama informs the readers by introducing how important having a large population would benefit a state and technological innovations argued by a demographer, Ester Boserup. Having a denser population is a product of growth. Fukuyama shows the idea of human societies engaging with violence and comparing tribal societies it is obviously safer than having to give up tribal equalities for protection. I agree how the author believes that this is why states eventually began to form. It is obvious that there must be resources used to the maximum potential and a population that is willing to be governed for comprehension is order to run a more perfect and satisfied union. It is also obvious that tribes should be willing to move and prosper among a more better climate zones to expand and grow more…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli the Prince

    • 10718 Words
    • 43 Pages

    Machiavelli describes the different kinds of states, arguing that all states are either republics or principalities. Principalities can be divided into hereditary principalities and new principalities. New principalities are either completely new or new appendages to existing states. By fortune or strength, a prince can acquire a new principality with his own army or with the arms of others.…

    • 10718 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hinduism Study Guide

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Caste system- divides people into separate social groups that have varying rights, responsibilities, professions, and statuses…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are four major theories that attempt to explain how states evolved from earlier governments and tribes:…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the several states” (I2) emphasizes that the people served as a central power. This consistency…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book Edward Luce discusses the castes systems and explains the differences and conflicts of this system. Edward Luce discusses how the caste systems are separated by the “dharma” or duty.” But it is the Dharma of caste that perhaps gives us the best insight into how India’s traditional society saw itself” (pg. 105). In India like most other…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wanting to make a person happy and free, it is completely subordinated to the state. On the other hand, talking about the correct structure of the state, he looked and looked in an idealized, they coined the past and could not be seen in the development of a civil society of the future of humanity.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oppression is a significant issue that has been growing in discourse as of late. As time progresses, the way people are treated and the opinions they hold change. When there is a group of people who have their rights changed, it will cause other groups to believe they are being cheated out of chances the privileges those people are allowed access to. While this may be accurate in rare cases, it is also difficult to argue strongly on the side of the people who have been, and still are considered to be in positions of power. Discrimination is an entirely different realm than systematic oppression, and people who are in these positions of power would simply not be able to experience these things. Examples that are becoming widely known to the…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philosophy Midterm

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What are the so-called “four elements” commonly discussed in Presocratic philosophy? Why are these elements important?…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ruling class

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Among the constant facts and tendencies that are to be found in all political organisms, one is so obvious that it is apparent to the most casual eye. In all societies—from societies that are very meagerly developed and have barely attained the dawnings of civilization, down to the most advanced and powerful societies—two classes of people appear—a class that rules and a class that is ruled. The first class, always the less numerous, performs all political functions, monopolizes power and enjoys the advantages that power brings, whereas the second, the more numerous class, is directed and controlled by the first, in a manner that is now more or less legal, now more or less arbitrary and violent, and supplies the first, in appearance at least, with material means of subsistence and with the instrumentalities that are essential to the vitality of the political organism.…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stoicism Vs Confucianism

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This paper is a comparison between two major schools of thought from two different areas of the world and their intrinsic similarities through their approach to political philosophy. Each work chosen for comparison represent a different philosophy from different areas yet hold striking similarities. The two source documents for this paper are “Meditations” by Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius and “Analects” by Chinese philosopher Confucius, both of which represent Stoicism and Confucianism respectively. These two works were chosen for this paper due to their similarities concerning subjects such as self-improvement thought self-judgment and parallels of what a good person is in order to rule as good leader. Aurelius was trained as a Stoic, a philosophy…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays