Preview

Kello V. City Of New London Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kello V. City Of New London Summary
Kelo v. City of New London

In the case of Kelo v. City of New London, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling that examined the power of the government in the exercise of the power of “eminent domain” (Scott 119). This power involves the authority of the government to take over the land from property owners forcefully. The guarantee to this power is enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, whereby the Federal, state or local representations of the government can forcefully possess or take over land from homeowners.

The question that the decision in Kelo v. City of New London raises is the reasons why the Supreme Court accepted it for adjudication. In this case, the property owner even after fair and just
…show more content…
This implies that while there is the separation of powers among the different arms of the government, courts are still inclined to remedy situations whenever the legislature has come up with bad laws. Therefore, the proper role of the judiciary is a constitutional arm of the republic such as the United States that adjudicates disputes according to the law as well as the original public meaning of what is desired by the citizens (Slotnick 1). This also involves the interpretation of the laws as integral parts of the constitution, which should reflect the changes in the society. Therefore, in the case of Kelo v. City of New London, the court broadened the meaning of public use to a much inclusive meaning that includes public purpose.

In conclusion, it is important to note that the case of Kelo v. City of New London showed how the judiciary through its courts could interchangeably use the constitution as well as public policy considerations to benefit its citizens. This underscores the Fifth Amendment provisions and the entire constitution that requires that disputes be adjudicated according to the law but at the same time meant to benefit the public. Therefore, the decision in the case to give the City of London to progress with their acquisitions was a sound one as it would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Facts: In 1998, the city of New London, Connecticut, authorized a $3.5 million bond issue in support of plans initiated by the New London Development Corporation (NLDC). This decision followed a state designation of the area as a “distressed municipality” and the closing of a US Naval facility, which employed over 15,000 people. The NLDC plans proposed the development of about 90 acres of land in the Fort Trumbull area of New London. The proposed developments would utilize the 32 acres on which the naval base had been situated, as well as more than 115 privately owned properties. The proposition included plans for 80 new residencies as well as a substantial commercial district…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kelo vs New London

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Where the US Supreme Court voted in 5 to 4 in favor of New London. Where New…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the wake of these actions, the city authorized the purchase of property within the development area and to utilize the acquisition of land through eminent domain if need be. Supported by the 14th amendment, the 5th Amendment allows local government the powers to utilize eminent domain to take private property for public use while appropriately compensating the former owners (Supreme Court 2004). During these acquisitions nine party members did not wish to sell their properties and challenged the taking of their land; stating that the transfer of land from one private owner to another to further economic development was a violation of the 5th amendment.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, the City of Monroe, North Carolina decided in April of 2002, to supply the citizens of Monroe and surrounding area with natural gas through a direct connection between its natural gas distribution system and the Transcontinental Pipeline. The Transcontinental Pipeline transports and distributes natural gas from the Gulf of Mexico up through the northeastern United States. The parties of this case requested the court to focus on the validity of a local government’s exercise use of its power of eminent domain. According to our textbook, Business Law Text and Cases, eminent domain is sometimes referred to as the condemnation power of government to take land for public use. The town of Monroe, North Carolina entered into an agreement with the town of Midland to facilitate the acquisition of land for the construction of the new pipeline by acquiring the rights of way to local land required for the installation of the pipeline. Per the agreement, Midland had the option to tap the pipeline at discounted rate. Midland then exercised its eminent domain authority to condemn the need…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case was the taking clause in the fifth amendment which enshrines your right to private property without undue government interference traditionally takings on the public use is included highways , schools and other owned government private projects but in 2005 supreme court turned that notion in to its ear .…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This court questions the reasoning of the lower courts. The main issue the court address is that of the evidence that was admitted by the lower courts. With that main issue there are sub-issues that are also addressed. The lower court misapplies the rule that test the admissibility of evidence. Even with the instruction form the judge the members of the court could use the information for an improper purpose.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Procedural History: At the conclusion of the trial, the defendant chose to move to dismiss on the grounds that the statute is unconstitutional, however, the courts found it unnecessary to pass due to constitutionality of the Ordinance because there is another reason it should be dismissed. The legal elements required to determine criminal accountability must be examined to determine if this case was handled correctly.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The test judges section 1 of the Charter which states that rights are guaranteed and “subject only to such reasonable limits . . .as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. Which means that the government must establish that the benefits of a law outweigh its negative impact, a charter violation. In the Keegstra case it was established that there was a overriding principle for Charter interpretation but with this comes the decision of determining and giving greater protection to the party that needs it the most. Similar to the Oakes case but both cases had different…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not long after the French affirmation, the United States recognized eminent domain in the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, which states, “… nor should private property be taken for public use, without just remuneration” (Kratovil &…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eminent domain is used widely used today to try and overtake other people's property. This occurs when the government will try to buy the land from you to be able to build their own buildings. In addition, this also occurs with states and cities trying to make people give up their homes so they can build buildings that are so called, "needed" for the city. Eminent domain has set standards, is fundamentally wrong, and makes people stand up. First, the city has set standards of what is considered blighted and what allows them to be able to take someone's house.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Davies and Harrigan aim their argument in a way to persuade Americans that the government is taking their property and not doing the job this political system was created to do. The ultimate purpose behind this argument is to urge American citizens to fight the eminent domain clause due to its exploitive powers. Davies and Harrigan propose this position to the American people in context in a reaction from what a Dallas Councilwoman said about the eminent domain clause. While doing that, the speakers also referred back to the 2005 Supreme Court case, Kelo v. City of New London, in order to reignite the controversy that had taken place in 2005. This helped them support their position by giving the people something to reflect over causing a negative nostalgic effect, which gave them an audience to adopt their…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial review is the power of the Supreme Court to declare acts of Congress, or actions of the executive-or acts or actions of state governments-unconstitutional and therefore null and void. This power is not mentioned in the Constitution but it is said that the Supreme Court ‘found’ the power for itself in the 1803 case of Marbury v Madison which was the first case that declared an act of Congress unconstitutional. Since then, the Supreme Court has used this power on numerous occasions-against both federal and state laws. By using its power of judicial review, the Court can, in effect, update the meaning of the words of the Constitution. There are many cases that illustrate how the Court fulfils its…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Free School Zone

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Before I can appropriately discuss the opinion given by the US Supreme Court Justices; I feel that at first I must explain the background of what happened and the question that was brought before the justices of the US Supreme Court and the facts of the case. During this paper I will try to give some background information as well as the various opinions related to this issue. I will attempt to analyze and discuss the overall final outcome as issued by the courts in 1995.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    its decision to hold up the development of the property. The company won the battle and was allowed to…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Were plaintiff’s injuries the result of Transit Authority’s negligent operation and maintenance of the escalator?…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays