Why Is Eminent Domain Safe
Eminent domain is used widely used today to try and overtake other people's property. This occurs when the government will try to buy the land from you to be able to build their own buildings. In addition, this also occurs with states and cities trying to make people give up their homes so they can build buildings that are so called, "needed" for the city. Eminent domain has set standards, is fundamentally wrong, and makes people stand up.
First, the city has set standards of what is considered blighted and what allows them to be able to take someone's house. In the video, they stated, "If one's home isn't safe, no one's house is safe." By this quote, it shows that eminent domain is happening all over the United States. The city will
be able to set specific standards to classify one's home as blighted.
Secondly, eminent domain is fundamentally wrong for government to take land from one and give it to another. The government isn't always the only one who takes land for their good. Cities can be convinced by businesses to try to take over other businesses land. This is morally wrong because cities shouldn't be able to fool another business in giving the land to another.
Lastly, people have to be able to stand up to keep their property. There have been cases such as, Kelo V. New London, to stop the government from taking property. The Institute of Justice seeks to restore strict limits for when the government can use eminent domain. The Supreme Court was willing to write a blank check for local and state governments to abuse eminent domain. Residents shouldn't be ok with eminent domain abuse because it is their property, and the government can't take that away from them.
In conclusion, eminent domain is a worldwide epidemic that causes a lot of anger and frustration. States are passing regulations that are limiting the use of eminent domain to clearly proscribed limits. Every has a right to decide where they live, and it's not fair for the government to take those rights from us. One should contact a local attorney experienced in eminent domain if they believe their property may be subject to eminent domain.
First, the city has set standards of what is considered blighted and what allows them to be able to take someone's house. In the video, they stated, "If one's home isn't safe, no one's house is safe." By this quote, it shows that eminent domain is happening all over the United States. The city will
be able to set specific standards to classify one's home as blighted.
Secondly, eminent domain is fundamentally wrong for government to take land from one and give it to another. The government isn't always the only one who takes land for their good. Cities can be convinced by businesses to try to take over other businesses land. This is morally wrong because cities shouldn't be able to fool another business in giving the land to another.
Lastly, people have to be able to stand up to keep their property. There have been cases such as, Kelo V. New London, to stop the government from taking property. The Institute of Justice seeks to restore strict limits for when the government can use eminent domain. The Supreme Court was willing to write a blank check for local and state governments to abuse eminent domain. Residents shouldn't be ok with eminent domain abuse because it is their property, and the government can't take that away from them.
In conclusion, eminent domain is a worldwide epidemic that causes a lot of anger and frustration. States are passing regulations that are limiting the use of eminent domain to clearly proscribed limits. Every has a right to decide where they live, and it's not fair for the government to take those rights from us. One should contact a local attorney experienced in eminent domain if they believe their property may be subject to eminent domain.