Bangladesh
1. Introduction Given their very nature and application, the definition of a “Public Private Partnership” (PPP) varies. Broadly, PPP’s are a contractual framework that enables government to work with the private sector to provide public services or infrastructure. This cooperation can be achieved at each or every stage along the life cycle of the project, including financing, construction and operation of the project. Although the private sector has been working with the public sector for many years, PPP’s represent a formalised framework that governments are increasingly applying to develop their relationships with the private sector.
The success of this practice is based on the premise that in many cases, the private sector is able provide a higher level of innovation, better access to finance and expertise in delivery of the service than government. If structured and managed correctly, over the life of the project, the PPP will provide value for money and cost the government less than if it had undertook the project itself. It will also allow the private sector to bear some of the financing and operating risk of the project (and earn a commercial return on this investment).
A Public Private Partnership should not be thought of as a “privatisation” or quasi-privatisation. Privatisation, by definition, is the transfer of ownership of state assets to private hands. Notwithstanding any regulatory and legislative requirements, how that privatised entity is managed and operates is then outside the scope of any further government responsibility.
This is not the case with PPP’s. While it can be said that the role of government changes, government still plays a major role. In all cases, it is responsible for a project’s output specifications and in many cases, paying for the services produced by the private sector. Payment however, is based on delivery of the contracted service to the specified requirements. Ideally, a PPP allows a government to utilise the private sector to deliver public services or infrastructure that the government requires, in a manner that is more cost effective and innovative than a purely government approach. 1.1 Typical PPP Frameworks
Public Private Partnerships and their structures depend on many varying factors, often individual to each situation. Table 1 provides a broad outline of typical PPP relationships.
Table. 1 Type of PPP’s
PPP Contractual Relationship Description
Build and Transfer The government specifies the required outcomes and functionality, but is not necessarily prescriptive in how this is achieved. The private sector bears the risk and the asset is transferred to government to operate upon completion.
Operate and Maintain An existing government asset is managed by the private sector. The contractor will be responsible for operating and maintaining the asset while providing the services to the customer.
Design Build Operate A combination of the Design & Construction and Operate and Maintain. The Private contractor is also responsible for financing the projects construction. Upon completion and either before or after commissioning, the government buys the asset. The management stays with the contractor but government retains ownership.
Build Own Operate Transfer The private partner is responsible for financing the entire lifecycle of the project (design, construction, operations and maintenance) and owns and operates the project through a concession period. In addition, the private partner bears all commercial risk. The asset is then turned over to the government at the end of an agreed term
Build Own Operate. As above, except private partner retains ownership of asset. Government agrees only to purchase services for a fixed period.
Lease Own Operate Private Partner leases an existing asset from the government for a specified time period. The asset may require refurbishment but no new assets are built. The private partner operates the asset throughout the life of the lease.
Risk Sharing Alliance Government and the Private contractor share any potential risks or windfalls associated with project risk. Issues such as pricing, service delivery standards and costs are pre-determined between the government and the private partner.
Over time it has become increasingly clear that there are certain common factors for developing successful PPP’s. While the concept of government working with the private sector is not new, the many challenges of developing and maintaining government-private sector relationships has led many governments to formalising the underlying policies and methodologies of PPP’s. These policies and methodologies help provide:
o Clear and transparent guidance to the private sector in building their relationship with government; o Guidelines on how the government works with the private sector; and o A level of standards at which the PPP will be carried out.
It is common for governments to involve the private sector on projects that are not necessarily defined as “public services” but where the provision of a service is nevertheless deemed important for national or regional development. Many governments, in both developing and developed economies, engage the private sector to provide either key infrastructure or services.
Typical sectors where PPP’s have been applied include:
o Telecommunications o Transport o Roads, Bridges and Railways o Water Supply, Sanitation and Development o Water Resources o Civil Aviation o Ports and Shipping o Power o Oil & Gas o Government building accommodations o Provision of ancillary services to core government functions
Box 1. PPP’s: Not Just about Infrastructure
In many economies, the scope of PPP’s has broadened. In addition to the provision of “traditional” projects such as infrastructure, countries such as the UK and Australia have used PPP’s as a means of providing ancillary services, such as building and maintaining accommodation for court houses and hospitals and other municipal facilities. Within these PPP’s however, government still delivers to the public those services which it deems as “core services”.
In each of these cases, the government pays an agreed service fee to private operator to provide pre-determined level of service, quality and output, allowing the government to undertake its “core services” such as holding trials or providing public medical care. Any shortfall in these levels of output or service (for instance courtroom availability) can be penalised by an agreed amount.
Increased Sophistication
PPP’s in these jurisdictions have witnessed new approaches to payment, where payments are based upon incentive mechanisms linked to outcomes from the PPP, rather than utilisation. For instance in the United Kingdom so called “shadow tolls” have been implemented where a private motorway owner is paid according to the number of cars who use that road and the congestion it alleviates on other roads. Rather than charging the user directly, payment is directly from the government. It also ensures that the private road owner retains the incentive to properly design and maintain the road as an effective alternative to other more congested roads.
Usefulness to growing economies
The concept of utilising PPP methodologies could potentially be a way that countries use to improve the delivery of public services. This would allow the government to concentrate on its “core services” provision, while transferring the risk associated with management and operations of ancillary activities to the private sector. If structured correctly, the incentives provided to the private sector could lead to an overall improvement in public services in a country or region.
On the payment side, in jurisdictions where private participation is still relatively new, or where political support for private sector involvement is still fragile, schemes such as shadow tolls or payment based on pre-determined service quality and levels can ensure that there is better value for money for government spending.
Case Studies
Case studies of two non-infrastructure PPP’s have been included following the appendices of this report which were compiled by the Victorian Auditor general. The first is a regional hospital in the Australian State of Victoria. The second is for the County Court in Melbourne, Australia.
1.2 Dedicated PPP Institutional and Policy Frameworks
One of the most common elements of all governments that have actively undertaken PPP’s is to establish a formal Partnerships framework to evaluate and facilitate projects.
Typically, while it is the Line Ministry that initiates PPP’s, many countries have established dedicated centre or department that can facilitate and provide assistance on PPP’s development. Throughout the region, a number of PPP centres exist. These include:
o Bangladesh Infrastructure Investment Centre; o Philippines BOT Centre o PICKO - Established at Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements Outlines of these programmes are available in Appendices 1, 2 and 3.
Where there is no dedicated centre, a dedicated policy framework and methodology is established has been established for PPP’s. In this case, the relevant line Ministry initiates and develops the project, in co-operation with the Finance Ministry, which must ensure fiscal compatibility with the government’s budgetary goals.
Within the region, perhaps the most developed and comprehensive PPP framework is the “Partnerships Victoria” policy in the Australian state of Victoria. In this case, the Victorian government applies and develops its PPP projects within a clearly defined policy framework and methodology.
Broad guidelines in Victoria (as well as other Australian states) require potential PPP projects to be tested extensively against the following points:
o Be in the public interest;
o Have the private parties proposed cost structure compared against a Public Sector Comparator (PSC) (i.e. a model of the net costs of the proposal under a traditional Government-financed method of delivery); and
o Achieve an optimal allocation of risk between the public and private sectors (rather than a ‘maximum’ transfer of risk to the private sector).
It is worth noting at this point that it is not a prerequisite to have a dedicated department or institution for successful PPP’s to be achieved. While many countries have nonetheless established dedicated institutions, it is clear that the essential factor is to have a robust PPP methodology established which then can be effectively utilised by all practitioners .
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Where they quickly gained momentum through more favourable synonyms such as “alternative service delivery”, and “public privatepartnerships, and became known as “Canadian Council for Public Private Partnerships”. They quickly managed to get their hands on a couple communities that were hurting for tax dollars, and implemented their privatization systems. Where the projects were disastrous and short-lived. Despite the many failures, these organizations managed to carry on as every time one of their projects ended in failure they managed to find a way to transfer the costs to the municipalities, and public. Before many people realized, government funding was given to the advertisement of privatization of public water systems. Continued with the Harper government where “PPP Canada” was created with a massive budget to further the advertisement of these corporations. That is where the corporations shifted focus from finding any municipality willing to give this privatization a try, and move towards one like quoted at the end of the first paragraph. A municipality that could be manipulated easily, and be a proven success to further their privatization movement. This is where the communities of Abbotsford, and Mission, B.C., come into…
- 796 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
IPMA is the World’s first project management association, founded in 1965. Our national associations collaborate to advance our profession's achievements in project and business success. Evidence of our strategic vision, our prior name was INTERNET, which we changed to IPMA, International Project Management Association, in the early 1970s. IPMA is member-driven, and volunteer-staffed. Our IPMA boards and Member Associations are filled with experienced project management practitioners. As a geographically-distributed organization, we collaborate on an ongoing basis, holding board and council meetings regularly around the World. This "collaborate globally, serve locally" approach to serving PPPM is unique to IPMA.…
- 492 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The meaning of Privatization has been widely debated as the years progressed, however one idea scholastics and experts appear to concede to is; privatization is a relationship between a private- sector organization and an administration office with the end goal of finishing a venture that will benefit the pubic. Privatization relationships are the upfront of ideological, political and economic debates, they continue to be used as political tools to solve problems associated with increased demand for public services growing concerns with the size of government, and decreased opportunities for additional resources (MaNamara, Morris 2008). No one public private partnership is the same, each utilizing different arrangements and public management…
- 211 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The IAPPM focuses on project and program management in the private sector, offering their insight to partners, PM communities, and members globally.…
- 321 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Many studies have showed that the private sector excels in using better technology to solve problems. On the other hand many of the government agencies for the most part rely on outdated technology and do not like to take risks to address those problems. Furthermore, for many people in the public sector such as health care workers privatization come with a high price, it threatens jobs security, pay, benefits, working conditions as well as career opportunities. Privatization also affects the public when it comes to public services, it means less quality, less access to health care and…
- 1293 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The Swedish construction business consists of four main actors namely JM, NCC, PEAB and Skanska that historically have had exclusive rights to bid on large-scale governmental projects. This is not a result of corruptive and lobbying activities but rather a result of the sheer size and financial budgets of these projects and firms with the ability to finance them. (Hådell and Uveborn, 2004). This in terms cause extensive competition between the medium players as they focus and fight over signing the medium- to small-scale projects.…
- 1273 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Arnaboldi, M., Azzone, G., & Savoldelli, A. (2004). Managing a public sector project: the case of the Italian treasury ministry. International Journal of Project Management, 22(3): 213-223.…
- 6470 Words
- 26 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Agreement between government and the private sector regarding the provision of public services or infrastructure. Purportedly a means of bringing together social priorities with the managerial skills of the private sector, relieving government of the burden of large capital expenditure, and transferring the risk of cost overruns to the private sector. Rather than completely transferring public assets to the private sector, as with Privatization. Government and business work together to provide services. The British Government has used PPP’s to finance the building of schools, hospitals, for defense contracts, and specific capital projects such as the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, the National Air Traffic Services, and improvements to the London Underground. The system has been criticized for blurring the lines between public and private provision, leading to a lack of accountability with regard to funding, risk exposure, and performance (see also Private Finance Initiative).…
- 1604 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Public Private Partnership (PPP) is a contract between a public sector institution/municipality and a private party, in which the private party assumes substantial financial, technical and operational risk in the design, financing, building and operation of a project. Traditionally, private sector participation has been limited to separate planning, design or construction contracts on a fee for service basis – based on the public agency‟s specifications. Expanding the private sector role allows the public agencies to tap private sector technical, management and financial resources in new ways to achieve certain public agency objectives such as greater cost and schedule certainty, supplementing in-house staff, innovative technology applications, specialized expertise or access to private capital. The private partner can expand its business opportunities in return for assuming the new or expanded responsibilities and risks. PPPs provide benefits by allocating the responsibilities to the party – either public or private – that is best positioned to control the activity that will produce the desired result. With PPPs, this is accomplished by specifying the roles, risks and rewards contractually, so as to provide incentives for maximum performance and the flexibility necessary to achieve the desired results “PPP is a partnership between the public and private sectors with clear agreement on shared objectives for the delivery of public infrastructure and/or public services.” There is no single PPP engagement model that can satisfy all conditions concerning a project‟s location setting and its technical and financial features. The most suitable model should be selected taking into account the country‟s political, legal and socio-cultural circumstances, and maturity of the country‟s PPP market and…
- 9330 Words
- 38 Pages
Good Essays -
Bibliography: Cruz, C. O. & Marques, R. C. (2010). Revisiting the Portuguese experience with public-private partnerships. [online]. [accessed 17 September 2013] Available at: http://www.academicjournals.org/ajbm/pdf/pdf2011…
- 3582 Words
- 14 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Procurement is when the government is outsourcing of goods, services or works from the private sector. It is favorable that the goods, services or works are appropriate and that they are procured at the best possible cost to meet the needs of the public in terms of quality, quantity, time, and location. Corporations and public bodies often define processes intended to promote fair and open competition for their business while minimizing exposure to fraud and collusion.…
- 695 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
5) The government will also ensure that public interest is protected in all PPP projects and that service delivery will meet public needs at the best value for money when the private sector is brought in to provide government services. While service delivery through a PPP changes the means of delivering services, it does not change the government’s accountability for ensuring that the services are delivered. The department’s focus shifts from providing the service to managing the service provider.…
- 2045 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
Partnerships are governed by the Partnership Act 1890 unless excluded by the partnership agreement. A partnership is defined in s.1 as ‘the relationship which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit.’…
- 574 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
If I were the president I will focus on: 1. Fishing industries Since our country is surrounded by rich bodies of water 2. Farming and agricultural Industries Encourage foreign investors to our country where raw materials are produced in our country Encourage and enhance Public-Private Partnership governed by the government. 3.…
- 4480 Words
- 23 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The project has been carried forward through a Public Private Partnership (PPP) between the NHAI and the corresponding contractors. The contractors will collect the toll taxes for a specified concession…
- 981 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays