In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…
Kierkegaard’s thought is in many ways a reaction against the philosophies of thinkers like Immanuel Kant and G.W. F Hegel. What is the primary problem that Kierkegaard has with the philosophies of both men? (Please note: Kant’s philosophy is different from Hegel’s; nevertheless, Kierkegaard thought they were both guilty of the same errors. For refreshers on the thought of Kant and Hegel, refer to the Kierkegaard PowerPoint in the materials section of blackboard.)…
When comparing such authors students can gain an in depth knowledge of that time as well as the overall state of Christianity and psychology in history. To end the class on Fear and Trembling a modern day comparison is drawn between the Knight of Faith in Kierkegaard’s book and the Knight of Faith in the 9/11 tragedy. The question is posed as to whether these terrorists were trying to grasp the finite and infinite at the same time during their suicide missions. If Abraham was willing to make a permanent sacrifice for his faith, were the terrorists doing the same for their faith? Making sense of a historical book in light of modern society is always a goal that should be emphasized in teaching and learning (Malesic,…
Throughout Elie Wiesel’s Holocaust narrative, Night, the struggle in remaining faithful is a predominant conflict the Jews face. The protagonist, Elie Wiesel, is depicted as a dynamic character who undergoes a vast transformation regarding his faith. As Elie encounters many hardships and horrors during the reign of Hitler, his faith in God is continuously tested to the point where he begins to alter his beliefs. Wiesel indicates that exposure to a cruel, inhospitable world prompts the deterioration of faith.…
Night by Elie Wiesel describes his experiences as a Jew in the Nazi concentration camps during World War II. Wiesel and other Jews survived, but many others did not. One of the key components to the Jews’ survival was faith along with hope.…
"Relationships require faith and trust. Discuss this statement as it applies to life in general. Refer to Barry and Moira's particular relationship in order to enhance your explanations."…
In order to show the great loss of faith Elie uses great word choice and unique and detailed phrases to illustrate the situation in the reader’s mind. An example of this intricate twisting of words is, “ Never shall I forget those moments that murdered my God and my soul and turned my dreams to ashes” (page 34). These sentences and descriptive words help describe the theme of loss of faith and also helps set the scene in the audience’s imagination, helping to push the emotions to new heights. Elie’s story was so important and so interesting that this story had to be conveyed with careful detail and meticulous placing of words so that the theme and attitude of the story was not misread. Another example of this great work that shows loss of faith is, “ His cold eyes stared at me. At last, he said wearily: ‘ I have more faith in Hitler than in anyone else. He alone has kept his promises, all his promises, to the Jewish people”(page 81).…
Elie Wiesel uses his relationship with God throughout the story to show the importance and difficulty of maintaining faith during hardship by the different views and consequences of either losing or keeping his faith.…
Kierkegaard and Nietzsche each have views that respond to the issue of faith and the life lived by the individual. Kierkegaard’s view is called the knight of faith and Nietzsche’s called overman.…
For much of the book Eli is a dedicated Jew. He is committed in his belief in God,!despite the unspeakable trials of pain that he must endure. As the novel progresses Eli sees more of his people suffer unspeakable events. He begins to question what kind of God can let this happen,he begins to doubt God. I don't think Eli ever really forsakes his belief in God rather than consider his faith and God's role in a world that holds much evil.…
In response to James Fowler 's "Stages of Faith”, I have to agree with a majority of these stages. With assumption that there are no social, physical or mental deficiencies, his stages are appropriate with life development. As I read his stages of life, I found myself giving him credit for a “rule of thumb” or “generally speaking” type of tone. Stage 0 is a predictable stage of life. "Primal or Undifferentiated" their faith is characterized by an early learning of the safety of their environment consisting of warmth, safety and secure vs. hurt, neglect and abuse. In all cultures and communities this is very common. As I read onto stage 1, this is where I started to not disagree, however extend the stages…
Faith, for me, is a way of life. It is believing that no matter what happens God is there to help me through each day. Faith is believing that life is good – always; and that God loves me – no matter what.…
So much about how Kierkegaard inspires Lear to give such a great importance to irony. Let us now turn at how he concretely conceives the experience of irony. In this regard, the rest of Kierkegaard’s journal entry has once again particular relevance. There, Kierkegaard asks himself in what did Socrates' irony really lie. His answer is that Socratic irony does not lie in virtuous talking. Instead, '[…][Socrates] whole existence is and was irony; whereas the entire contemporary population of farm hands and business men and so on […] were perfectly sure of being human and knowing what it means to be a human being, Socrates […] occupied himself with the problem – what does it mean to be a human being? […] Socrates doubted that one is a human being…
Cited: Pojman/Rea, Solomon, Kierkegaard. Encountering The Real: Faith And Philosophical Enquiry. Mason: Cengage Learning, 2012.…
The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the truth telling violations presented in the Abraham and Rehab Bible stories. Both stories are indicative of deception that demonstrate how if people are placed in a position of uncertainty can lose their faith in performing a moral obligation which is telling the truth regardless of the situation. Extreme circumstances can hinder the decision making process and can lead to deception. The ideology of truth telling is the mere fact that God teaches us that deception is wrong and as individuals refraining from violating truth telling is God’s will.…