Preview

Korematsu vs. United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
572 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Korematsu vs. United States
Fred Korematsu was born in the U.S. in 1919. His parents were born in Japan. Since he was born in the U.S. he was a citizen. He grew up like a normal kid in California. As he grew up, his life was normal, until the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1942.
After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were regarded as a threat to the U.S. President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, also know as the Exclusion Order. This Order stated that any descendents or immigrants from enemy nations who might be a threat to U.S. security will report to assembly centers for Internment. There were no trials or hearings. They were forced to evacuate and many lost their homes and their businesses. Fred Korematsu refused to go. He was a U.S. citizen. Fred Korematsu was grabbed by police, handcuffed, and taken to jail. His crime -- defying President Franklin Roosevelt's order that American citizens of Japanese descent report to internment camps
This action violated Korematsu's basic constitutional rights. The fourth amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized." The government's actions clearly stepped over the boundaries of the constitution. As a U.S. citizen he should not have been pushed around like that. Korematsu decided to take his case to the court.
Korematsu's case first went to regional court. After being turned down there, he then went to the court of appeals. Being turned down there also, his lawyer appealed to the Supreme Court while he was held in the relocation camp. The Supreme Court decided to take his case, but then made the wrong worst decision ever. They decided to uphold the other courts' decisions by a vote of six to three.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Justice Owen J. Roberts saw the situation as a clear violation of Korematsu's Constitutional rights. Roberts was quoted as saying, “ . . .it is a case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Roberts saw the discrimination in the way Executive Order 9066 was being carried out. Just as Adolph Hitler was funneling Jew into Concentration Camps in Germany, the United States was similarly doing the same thing to Japanese…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive Order 9056 Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Korematsu indicated that the government was violating the Fifth Amendment which consist that no one should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. The decision in Korematsu indicates that the executive order actually violated the Bill of Rights which include some of his personal rights. Korematsu refused to leave California when he was asked to move into the military homes because he claimed that he was being deprived of his right to live freely and he indicated that the government should not have permission to make these decisions without a due process of law. The due process law is considered in certain court cases to restrict the amount of control the government has available to exercise over their citizens. Since this due process law clause was in fact found in the court case, Korematsu was arrested not due to the racism, but due to the fear of another incident happening similar to what happen in Pearl Harbor. Since he did not follow the order given by the government he had to suffer the consequences of being arrested. Based on this decision, the Supreme Court enforced the Constitution with its decision they took in Korematsu. This type of temporary segregating Japanese Americans by relocating them in interment camps was ruled constitutional. This case was successful in keeping national security and prevented other attacks to…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Once President Franklin D. Roosevelt announced war against Japan, many Japanese-Americans started to fear for their lives, due to the fact many people assumed, they were partly responsible. Seventy-four days after the bombing, President Roosevelt, issued an executive order No. 9066. This order authorized the Secretary of War to force Japanese-Americans…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case as well the injustice of Fred Korematsu would have faded into obscurity if not in 1981 Legal Historian Peter Irons had not asked the Justice department for access to the case files. The case files containing memos of lawyer who has accused the Solicitor General of purgry, stating the Solicitor General lied to the Supreme Court about the real threat from Japanese-Americans (Bai 38). When asked by Irons, Korematsu agreed to go back to court. In going back to court he became and advocate to the injustice of Japanese-American internment camps in the 1940’s. When Korematsu was offered a settlement offer of a pardon for his crime, but not cleared from his record he refused, saying “ As long as my record stands in Federal court, any American citizen can be held in prison or in concentration camps without a trial or a hearing” (Bai 38). The Judge in the case agreed and ruled Korematsu as innocent and that internment was illegal, the Supreme Court struck down the “bill” and declared it un-constitution. In 1998 President Bill Clinton Awarded Korematsu with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, for his Principal Resistance. In 2004 outraged at the situation in Guantanamo Bay Involving Arabs, and suspected the same problems with them as with the…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    2. President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order #9066 during World War II to force all Americans of Japanese decent to be sent to internment camps because they posed a threat to the United States. Korematsu, a man born on American soil, refused to go to an internment camp because he believed that he was an American citizen, and should be treated as one.…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result, Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps, regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese American citizen, refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore, he was convicted of disobeying the law. This landmark court case was deemed unconstitutional due to the violation of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment:…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, FDR issued Executive Order 9066, ordering all Japanese American citizens to be put into internment camps while on the other side of the Pacific, Japanese soldiers would soon capture and imprison American soldiers into POW camps. The American’s Japanese internment camps and The Japanese POW camps were both terrible conditions for a world at war, but the conditions and the lasting effects on the prisoners were starkly different. The books Farewell to Manzanar by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand show the stories of the Wakatsuki family in America’s Japanese internment camp Manzanar and Louie Zamperini in the Japanese POW camps (despite Zamperini being sent to multiple camps, Naoetsu…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue at hand here concerned two points. The first one is whether or not the US Attorney General John D. Ashcroft has violated the four amendment prohibition the arrest of any individual without just cause ( the right of the people to be secure in their persons). The second point concerned a probable immunity against lawsuit, granted by law, for all government officials in the exercise of the…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive Order 906 Essay

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Executive Order 9066 was put into place on February 19, 1942 by President Franklin Roosevelt which was just as a few months after Japan had attacked America on Pearl Harbor. Executive Order 9066, “...which authorized sending all Americans of Japanese descent to ten makeshift internment camps…”(Roark, Pg.834), was established in order to prevent an internal attack from the Japanese on American soil. Since Roosevelt wanted America secure from the potential risk of Japanese Americans as quickly as possible, the Japanese lost a great deal of their property and with that the majority of their money. Although Roosevelt was ordering Japanese American citizens into internment camps, this was still considered constitutional since…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While, yes he did defy the government, the government was acting in a way that was discriminatory against an innocent group of people and the arrest of Fred Korematsu was unwarranted. The Supreme Court’s actions and declaration that the internment of the Japanese-Americans was “constitutional” caused an extreme injustice among the people that it harmed. The fact that he was sent to a concentration camp purely on his race alone was unconstitutional and Justice Owen Roberts that if this assumption is correct “I need hardly labor the conclusion that Constitutional rights have been violated.” It was, and is, clear that any such orders go against the very premise that the United States of America is built…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korematsu Essay

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Korematsu was born to a Japanese-American family that owned a flower nursery in 1919. After World War II broke out, Japanese living in Pacific states were sent to internment camps. Korematsu refused to go to an internment camp. In 1942 he was arrested and sent to a camp. The U.S. Supreme Court supported his conviction in 1944 on the grounds of military necessity. In 1983, Korematsu appealed his conviction. Later that year a federal court in San Francisco overturned the conviction. In 1988 Congress passed legislation apologizing for the internments and awarded each survivor $20,000. While the American concentration camps never reached the levels of Nazi death camps as far as atrocities are concerned, they remain a dark mark on the nation's record…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heart of Atlanta v. United States (1964) - Any business that was participating in interstate commerce would be required to follow all rules of the federal civil rights legislation. In this case, a motel that wanted to continue segregation was denied because they did business with people from other states. This important case represented an immediate challenge to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the landmark piece of civil rights legislation which represented the first comprehensive act by Congress on civil rights and race relations since the Civil Rights Act of 1875. For much of the 100 years preceding 1964, race relations in the United States had been dominated by segregation, a system of racial separation which, while in name providing for "separate but equal" treatment of both white and black Americans, in truth perpetuated inferior accommodation, services, and treatment for black Americans. During the mid-twentieth century, partly as a result of cases such as Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932); Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944); Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948); Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950); McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950); NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958); Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960) and probably the most famous, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), the tide against segregation and white supremacy began to turn. However, black Americans ' fight for equal civil rights was far from over. In particular, the southern United States, where the Heart of Atlanta Motel was located, remained segregated even into the late 1960s.Passed on July 2, 1964, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned racial discrimination in public places, particularly in public accommodations, largely based on Congress ' control of interstate commerce.The Heart of Atlanta motel was a large, 216-room motel in Atlanta, Georgia, which refused to rent rooms to black patrons, in direct…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pearl Harbor

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pearl Harbor was a day that ultimately changed history by causing Americans to join together in the war effort. It was a day that united the whole country in the war effort. Before this attack, there were small rumors, and few signs of war support.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Infamy Speech

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Yesterday, December 7, 1941 - a date which will live in infamy”, a quote that almost every American is familiar with. On December 8th, 1941, the day after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D Roosevelt asked to declare war against Japan. The country had been divided on putting ourselves in the war in Europe and Asia, because “it was not our concern”. Yet, after President Roosevelt’s, the country immediately changed their minds, and were all for justice for us Americans. The speech was convincing because of strong emotional appeals, extraordinary organization, and the establishment of character.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays