The company needs to convince about 75% of the managers that the normal way the company is operating is dangerous. Therefore, the company in this stage needs to identify and discuss problems, potential problems, and major opportunities to produce satisfying change. In the second stage, the company assembles a group of staff members to lead the effort of change. The company in this stage encourages the group of staff members to work as a team outside the usual hierarchy. In the third stage, the company creates a vision that directs the effort of change. Strategies are developed in order to realize the created vision. In the fourth stage, the created vision and strategies for achieving it are …show more content…
In the first stage, change can be undermined when the company underestimates the difficulty of driving staff members away from their comfort zones. The company manager become paralyzed by the risks associated with changing the normal way the company operates. In the second stage, change may not be realized when the company underestimates the difficulty of producing change and hence the significance of meaningful guiding coalition. This implies that groups that have no strong leadership never attain the power needed to create guiding coalition needed to necessitate change. In the third stage, change may not come to fruition because the vision is too complicated and vague to be communicated to staff members. Without an elaborate vision, change efforts can not be realized ant the company succeeds in causing confusion that can lead the company to a wrong