Preview

Kraft and Cadbury Merger

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kraft and Cadbury Merger
Table of content
Table of Contents PART A 2 I. Introduction 2 1.1 How and why Kraft identified Cadbury as a potential partner? 2 1.2 Expected benefits 2 1.3 Synergies for both companies involved? 3 1.4 The risks associated with the choice of acquisition as an approach to this particular ‘partnership’ 4 1.5 Feasible alternative? 5 Involvement of National and corporate cultures 6 Critical Evaluation of both the companies about this Partnership 6 Involvement Of the Government 6 Four Key Benefits 7 Effect on Shareholders 8 Conclusion 9 PART B 10 Four aspects of doing business Internationally 10 Benefits of these aspects 11

Kraft & Cadbury

-------------------------------------------------
PART A

I. Introduction

The following analysis has been made about the merger of Kraft and Cadbury, to find out that are they both potential partners and how will they survive in the long run. What might be the risks for both of the companies that they might face after this merger? What is the role of the government in this merger? What is the impact on the shareholders, what are their thoughts about it and is it a successful merger or not. Other than Kraft and Cadbury four aspects of doing business internationally has been discussed and their influence in an international business career.

1.1 How and why Kraft identified Cadbury as a potential partner?
On 19th January 2010 Kraft the American Giant, acquired Cadbury the most popular and one of the most selling brand in chocolates for $11.5bn. The reason for Kraft to identify Cadbury as its potential partner and even after Cadbury rejected its first bid on 7th September 2009, and then came up with a higher bid, was that Kraft wanted to bring in the most loved British Chocolates to USA, because the chocolates that America produces are only loved by American’s and are not so loved around the world, while they targeted the British company because they make better chocolates plus

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    According to Financial Management, acquiring another firm in the same industry has variables with multi-faucet advantages and disadvantages, depending on the execution of the plan. “Businesses grow in one of…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mercury Case

    • 1198 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In summary, the acquisition can make complementary advantages of both sides. Using the DCF model will show if it should be taken or not.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Kraft’s marketing strategy will benefit significantly from buying Cadbury in two different ways. Firstly, when we look at the brand portfolio of Kraft, which is the world’s second biggest food company. It is clear that there are plenty of old-timer cash cows, such as cheese, Nabisco and Suchard, but there are only very few rising stars. According to the Boston Matrix, cash cow means a product with a high share of a slow growth market, which can generate a stable profit. Stars are the products that are in high growth markets with a relatively high share of that market of that market. In this case, The cash cows of Kraft would be Maxwell House Coffee, Toblerone chocolate which can generate a stable profit but no growth. On the other hand, There is a star product in Cadbury, which is the chewing gum business ( Trident and Trebor Mint Gum ) in a high growth market with a relatively high share. And Cadbury also owns a number of long-established brands, its chewing gum business is regarded as having huge growth potential. Therefore, I think Kraft would definitely benefit from buying Cadbury with it’s chewing gum business, because stars tend to generate high amounts of income in a high growth market. Secondly, Kraft generates 80% of all its profit in America, and its stuck at home while the biggest areas for future growth would be china, India and other developing countries. Cadbury generates only 30% of its income in Britain, and also a major brand in Brazil and India. In the first half of 2009, 69% of its sales growth came from ‘emerging markets’, which I think Cadbury is having a better performance than Kraft’s. Because Cadbury has made a huge success in those developing countries, like India…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cadbury conflict

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Businesses can come across many conflicts between stakeholders, which are the people that are impacted by the business. Cadbury, the chocolate producer, has started an organization, worth £9 million pounds, to put sports equipment in school across the UK. Customers would need to save tokens from chocolate bars and give them to the schools. To get the first equipment, 750 tokens are needed. While to allow the school to obtain a variety of different equipment, it needed 2000 tokens. For schools who can’t afford these new equipment, this idea was very appealing. Cadbury’s ‘Get Active Campaign’ was sponsored with deals from Cadbury and the government by top sports stars such as boxer Audley Harrison and runner Paula Radcliffe. However the company and the government were blamed for increasing the rate and the chances of obesity in young people, because they would eat more chocolate through this scheme.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kraft Foods, Inc., a US-based food and beverage company, has acquired Cadbury plc, a UK-based confectionery company, for approximately $19,413.30 million.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philip Morris - Kraft Case

    • 1990 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this case, we will analyse how a hostile takeover creates benefits for both parties. The hostile takover approach can be considered as ”taking over a company with a hostile manner” but with the offers and deals, it becomes a solution to many different structures within the company. The decisionmaking through a case as this requires experienced, rational management skills to take the right position with a right choice. The one of the world’s biggest packed food company, Kraft Foods Inc. has so many innovations and mergers on the same sector. Kraft has been started to work on the cheese sector and generated many enterpreneurships of their own sector. This shows us how Kraft is a profitable company and their management tries to stimulate the market share of the company which is reaching the top. Also they are considered that one of the biggest prime company in the world. Mostly, the products of Kraft are based on packed food. Their well-known brands are: Cracker Barrel Natural Cheese, Miracle Whip salad dressing, Velveeta process Cheese, Breyers, Philadelphia Cream Cheese, Parkay and numerous others. While the food industry is on its way to the rise, Kraft generated a power in the institutional food market and create a value on manifacturind and marketing. They also created a strategy to diversify the firms and sectors related food market into the core business line such as dairy foods, snack foods and convenience foods and beverages. Kraft was successful in their industry and has acquired many firms which are in the similar business line like international, domestic and consumer food. However Kraft has decided to make an acquisiton with an firm which 1…

    • 1990 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the spring of 2015, Kraft and Heinz merged together to form Kraft Heinz. This established, the now joint company, as the third largest food company in the world (HJ Heinz). A merge between two companies isn’t uncommon in society today, and the process is not restricted to one type of industry. Merging and integrated industry concentration is able to be done in a multitude of industries, from the food industry to the electricity industry. Each merge and integration have consequences, and though there may be a vast amount of positives for both companies, the process can still fail. This can be seen in the attempted horizontal integration of Canadian BCE TV and Astral Media.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Havells India

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With any acquisition come potential risks. These risks include Financial, Diversification, Cultural, Management, and Knowledge. Each risk requires individual attention and should be looked at and considered. When one has risks they should be weighed in order to determine whether the decision will prove profitable.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 2009, Kraft Foods launched a hostile bid for Cadbury, the UK-listed chocolate maker. Kraft needed Cadbury to provide scale for the snacks business, especially in emerging markets such as India.…

    • 4571 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many successful businessmen and women have concluded that the most successful acquirers are also the most disciplined. In order to secure a lucrative and profitable acquisition all strategic alternatives ought to have been considered and prudently explored. Furthermore, a clear operating strategy post-acquisition is something that must be in place pre- acquisition. Despite this notion, many acquisitions seem to be driven by an urge to generate synergy, without any specific operating strategies in place.…

    • 2543 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cadbury Schweppes Case Study

    • 12635 Words
    • 51 Pages

    In late October 2002, Sir John Sunderland, chairman and CEO of Cadbury Schweppes, contemplated the future of his global confectionery and beverage company. Over the previous decade, the company had made several acquisitions to complement its portfolio of chocolate, soft drinks, sugar confectionery (candy), and gum. Now it was considering a bid for Adams, the number two player in the worldwide gum business and, with its Halls brand, a leader in sugar confectionery. After researching the acquisition for many months, his Chief Strategy Officer Todd Stitzer and the Adams deal team were approaching the point of no return. Sunderland knew that they would have to bid more than $4 billion to have any chance of winning Adams. Should they go ahead with the offer and if so, was all debt financing of the bid appropriate? At this lofty price, how certain could the Cadbury Schweppes’ team be that they could create value? He wondered, was the strategy behind the acquisition sound, and could the leadership team successfully execute an acquisition and integration plan of this magnitude? (Exhibits 1, 1a, and 2).…

    • 12635 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Founded in 1869 The Pillsbury Company began as a flour milling firm in Minnesota. This company was then bought by Grand Metropolitan (GrandMet) in 1989, a UK-based consumer goods and retail corporation who sought to become a world leader in branded food and drinks businesses. In 1994 Pillsbury - North America sector created 50% of GrandMet 's 1993 sales of 8 billion dollars due to their 75% market share of refrigerated dough. A choice was made by CEO of Pillsbury Paul S…

    • 2505 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How will they increase market share? They already are the number 1 fruit punch drink sold in the U.S.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Publicis Groupe

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Maurice Levy, the most important thing he learnt from the failure of the alliance with FCB is the necessity to build an alliance not only based on a good relationship between the managers but also on a strong legal structure. In fact, the relationship Maurice created with FCB’s managers was mostly informal. Maurice and FCB’s CEO met only five times and the alliance was more a collaborative arrangement than a real agreement. The author describes it as an alliance which “intended to be more than just a handshake” but without any agreement on the structure of the deal, the alliance seems mostly to rely on the managers’ relationship. On the contrary, in the next process of acquisitions, Levy not only met the managers several times, he had also special meetings with the CFOs where they try to reach an agreement about the structure of the deal and the structure of the company after the acquisition. For example, for Saatchi & Saatchi acquisition, Maurice worked out the details of the acquisition with the CFO Bill Codhrat and they discuss all the legal points to undertake to face the future events which could affect both companies after the acquisition. They spent two weeks working on the structure of the deal, settling every details before calling lawyers. After the failed FCB alliance, the lawyers became indispensable in the process of acquisition.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Doing Business

    • 5033 Words
    • 21 Pages

    This is defined to the group of “Two or more persons” combine “their resources and expertise” to operate an event to be a more “efficient unit” (Adrian Palmer & Bob Hartley, 2009, p.218). Wall & Ress tell the true “Few firms can afford to be sophisticated in all areas” (Stuart Wall & Bronwen Ress, 2001, p.19). Hereby, normally partnership…

    • 5033 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays