Preview

Lao Tzu Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lao Tzu Research Paper
Lao Tzu idea and concept of what makes a proper leader and how the government should work is extremely different than Niccolo Machiavelli. Lao Tzu's view is the ruler believes that to gain respect and love from people, you should give them their freedom, don't force rules on them or even act powerfully. But at the same time Machiavelli's view of the good leader is that the prince should maintain his power by having a powerful and structured government and strong rules so he could have an overall control over the people and the country. But Lao Tzu opinion is that you cannot have a total control over the people because he sees that the world will govern itself. Machiavelli thinks that he should be underhand, wiliness and dictator so he can maintain …show more content…
Like what Lao Tzu says, “They act without effort and teach without words.”
9. Building a good relationship with the people will help him maintain his throne unlike Machiavelli
10. According to Lao Tzu you cannot gain respect and love from people if you fear them.
11. Because when the chance comes to your people, they will get together and go against you without even thinking it. As a result of your strong rules and your structured government. the basis you put, will build the strength of your country
12. At first, if you want to make the people love you, you should make them love you and build a strong connection between you and them.
13. So instead of forcing rules and making people afraid from you, you should just number: 12 just as Lao Tzu.
14. If you stop punishing them and give them their freedom, they will go for the right thing by themselves. Naturally born good, trust people and they will do the right thing,, you need people's trust.
15. He believes that Weapons are the tools of fear a decent man will avoid them except in the direst necessity, which means to act when it's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summary: The writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu indicate that they would disagree most strongly on the concept of how a government should run. Machiavelli believed that in strong government control by a prince who acted more in terms of practicality and maintaining power than through moral principles. Lao Tzu, on the other hand, took a more individualistic, carefree approach, believing that a ruler will be respected and followed if he does not act powerfully and force rules and issues.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-tzu and Machiavelli are political philosophers writing in two different lands and two different times. Lao-tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher from 6th century BC, the author of Tao-te Ching, and Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who lived 2000 years after Lao-tzu's time, author of Prince. They are both philosophers but have totally different perspective on how to be a good leader. While both philosopher's writing is instructive. Lao-tzu's advice issues from detached view of a universal ruler; Machiavelli's advice is very personal perhaps demanding. Both philosophers' idea will not work for today's world, because that modern world is not as perfect as Lao-tzu described in Tao-te Ching, and not as chaotic as Machiavelli illustrated in Prince.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu have very different aspects about how a prince should govern his people. Machiavelli dwells over the fact, whether it is better to be loved or feared. He believes that the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli vs. Lao-Tzu

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In comparing and contrasting the governmental philosophies of the great thinkers Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli, I have found a pleasant mix of both of their ideas would be the best for America today. Lao-Tzu's laisse-faire attitude towards the economy, as well as his small scale military is appealing to my liberal side, while Machiavelli's attitude towards miserliness which causes low taxes appeals to the right wing. These great thinkers contradict the popular saying "all great thinkers think alike." They have several ideas, such as taxes, that are the same, while other ideas, like the involvement of government in citizens' everyday lives are totally opposite. I shall start with the ideas of Machiavelli, then move on to Lao-Tzu's, and finally a comparison and application into American life. Niccolo Machiavelli believes in a strong government. The leader should be strong and feared. I believe he gets this idea from the fear of God; no one is supposed to question God because he is so feared, and in the same sense, no one should question a strong leader. Machiavelli realizes that the leader should be feared, but not hated. A hated leader will probably be killed in a rebellion. One also can not be loved. Any compassion towards your citizens will make them believe you are weak, and they will rebel. He thinks a very strong military is necessary at all times, and that powerful arms should be available and in hand. This idea is similar to that of right wing America and our friends, the National Rifle Association, who believe assault rifles are America's pastime. The nation should always be prepared for war, and should always be searching for new lands to conquer. This is much like our cold war with the USSR and the new lands to conquer would be anything Communist. These wars should go on without high taxes. High taxes as well cause rebellion. Case in point: the high taxes levied against America by the British, as well as other strong factors, led to the American revolution. He…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    14. Atticus doesn't overreact. He questions them, taking the scissors away. He’s a good father/role model.…

    • 2067 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    24. The sun illuminates only the eye of the man, but shines into the eye and the heart of the child.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He elaborates on the fact that the best leader is not even known to exist. “When (the master’s) work is done, the people will say, “Amazing : we did it, all by ourselves””, according to Lao. He is trying to restate and exaggerate the, quite possibly most important, point in his writing. He states that “the master doesn't talk, he acts”, showing that he is not only a leader for the positive relationship he has with the people, but also for doing the things that need to be done. Despite this fact, this “best type” of leader doesn't take the credit for what could be argued is his success. He does this because of the trusting bond and positive relationship he holds with his people, allowing them the success, but also maintaining his role in leadership by not even hinting at the true depth of his rule. And it is because of this that I agree with Lao-tzu; anyone this selfless and pure of intent deserves to rule over a trustworthy people, just as much as the people of any place deserve a leader of this…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    7. To me, this statement means whenever someone has a dangerous situation always keep another gun which is stronger just in case…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buddhism Worksheet

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4) Right action- My actions do not hurt any other being that can feel hurt, including…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    medea study questions

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. She fears the tempers of great people, and their random natures that are born from that.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biology

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12. I agree with the disabled man who states, “ I don’t understand. We don’t make any trouble. We don’t steal things or kill people. We don’t take the good jobs. Why do you want to kill us?” because all the…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Get them

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    14. No matter how much intelligence you have, there is always room for improvement. T…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. The significance of it is that sometimes people just need a chance to show people that they`re willing to change if you give them hope.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    His Grace and Songs

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    9. I keep loving you Lord again and again You gave to me all your love I wanna do just the same My life, I live for you How could I ever live…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays