Preview

Lau vs. Nichols: English Language Learners

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lau vs. Nichols: English Language Learners
There are three federal court cases that provide the legal foundation for providing equal educational opportunity to students with limited English Proficiency, Lau vs. Nichols 1973, Castaneda vs. Pickard 1981 and Plyler vs. Doe 1982 (The English Language Learners Knowledge Base, 2004).

This research paper will focus on Lau vs. Nichols, a major ruling by the Supreme Court in reference to Title VI of the Civil rights act of 1964. In this research paper I will give the history, outcome and discuss the implications that have affected ELL classroom / learners of the future. This cases main point was that when children arrive in school with little or no English-speaking ability, "sink or swim" instruction is a violation of their civil rights.

In 1974 The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the Lau vs. Nichols case set major precedent regarding the educational rights of language minorities, although this fact is grounded in statute (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964), rather than in the U.S. Constitution. At issue was whether school administrators may meet their obligation to provide equal educational opportunities merely by treating all students the same, or whether they must offer special help for students unable to understand English. Lower federal courts had absolved the San Francisco school district of any responsibility for minority children 's "language deficiency." But a unanimous Supreme Court disagreed. Its ruling opened a new era in federal civil rights enforcement under the so-called "Lau Remedies." The decision was delivered by Justice William O. Douglas on January 21, 1974 (Find Law, 2006).

History

The following are inserts from the case. This class suit brought by non-English-speaking Chinese students against officials responsible for the operation of the San Francisco Unified School District sought relief against the unequal educational opportunities which were alleged to violate, inter alia, the Fourteenth Amendment. No specific remedy was urged upon



References: Evergreen Freedom Foundation, (2001) Bilingual education, removing the barriers, School Director 's Handbook, Retrieved January 25, 2006 from, http://www.effwa.org/pdfs/education_directors_handbook3.pdf#search= 'lau%20vs.nichols Find Law (2006) U.S 414 U.S. 563, Retrieved January 26, 2006 from, http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=414&invol=563 The English Language Learners Knowledge Base (2004) Guiding Federal Court Cases on Equal Educational Opportunity, Retrieved January 28, 2006 from, http://www.helpforschools.com/ELLKBase/legal/Court_Cases_Federal_Equa_Educ_Opp.shtml The Law (2006) ELL/ELD Newcomers book, Retrieved January 28, 2006 from, January 28, 2006, from, http://i2i.org/article.aspx?ID=613

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mendez v. Westminster (1946) was a case enacted by, “Gonzalo Mendez, William Guzman, Frank Palomino, Thomas Estrada, and Lorenzo Ramirez” who “filed suit on behalf of their fifteen…children and five thousand other minor children of ‘Mexican and Latin descent’” (Valencia, 2010, p.23). They sued Westminster school district because they were denying their children the right to enter schools near their home. The school was in California and was predominantly White and did not allow any Mexican American children to attend. Mendez claimed that the school was segregating his children, and others, based on race and kept them separate from the White Society. The “Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment played a key role in the Mendez case”…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I am writing this paper on the court case of Hudson District School vs. Rowley. I will discuss those involved in the case, what issues brought this case to trial, how and when the case was adjudicated, and the final outcome of the trial. I will also tell how I feel about this case and what it accomplished for the education system. Every student has the right to have an individual education plan (IEP). Although all students with disabilities are entitled to an IEP that does not necessarily mean they are eligible for every form of technology available to them. IEP are designed to keep children with disabilities as current as those students without disabilities. Amy Rowley did in fact have an individualized education plan, but her parents believed she was entitled to more. Hendrick Hudson vs. Rowley was the first U.S. Supreme Court’s trial under the Education for All Handicapped Children which is now known as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, (IDEA).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our textbook on page 61, it gives us a case called, Lau v. Nichols. This case was about 1,800 Chinese students from San…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court made a number of decisions regarding education in this time period, for example, in source C, The Supreme Court made a decision in 1950 in regards to McLaurin vs Oklahoma State Regents, when a negro student was denied permission for certain areas in a school, confined to their own tables and sections in the library and cafeteria. This shows that the Supreme Court could effectively interpret the constitution and federal laws. This decision is much like Sweatt vs Painter, Texas, where a similar situation had occurred, except a Negro student was not permitted admittance, let alone segregation inside the building. Also, in Cooper vs Aaron, the Supreme Court stated that states were bound by the court’s decisions, and could not ignore them. Arkansas then amended the state constitution to oppose desegregation, and then relieved children from “Mandatory attendance in segregated schools. This shows that the Supreme Court was still applying law and constitution in the aid of the advancement of African Americans. In Brown vs Board of Education of Topeka, 1954, it came that Chief Just Warren said, “We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal…. Segregation in public education is a denial of the equal protection of the laws.” This gives African Americans a platform to advance from, reaffirming “separate but equal” in their favour. The Supreme Court had overturned separate but equal, showing that they are perhaps, despite their best means to remain impartial, beginning to show signs of a will for desegregation and quality between races.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bilingual education has been a debatable subject since its conception during the case of Lau vs. Nichols, in the early 1970’s. However, in that case, the court only ruling was that the children’s Fourteenth Amendment (Equal Protection) was violated, but never outlined as to how things were to be carried out in the future to prevent further incidences. Due to the fact, that the LEP/ELL student must be able to transfer to knowledge, skills, and concepts from the first language to the second and vice-versa and are further required to learn the same content and pass the same assessments as other students, accountability had to be aligned with the terms of the consent decree.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One important court ruling regarding bilingual education was the case of Lau vs. Nichols, in early 1970. Although the…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Module 7 Esl 533n (Gcu)

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    King, D. Kent. English Language Learners: Title III- No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before the 1950’s the City of Stone Mountain, DeKalb County, Georgia was known for its Klu Klux Klan rallies; its all white, pristine middle-class neighborhoods; and its superb schools. The unrelenting Civil Rights Movement entered into the United States during the 1950’s and 1960’s, leading to the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). Although it has been argued that Brown failed to institute actual societal change, it still is considered to be a landmark decision from a legal perspective. Today’s public schools in DeKalb County’s Stone Mountain area are integrated with scores of minority faces of African Americans and Hispanics students, and a handful of white students. While the historic decision of Brown v. Board of Education repealed America’s “separate but equal doctrine”, segregation still exists in our public schools. This is a look at the history of the Brown v. Board of Education decision, how it impacts public schools today, and its effect on other Civil Rights laws.…

    • 2471 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The population of English Language Learners has made a tremendous growth in American, over the past few years the English Language Learners has grown more the twenty percent and is predictable to increase more with time. With the population growing in our educational system modifications had to be made. The laws specifies that all children who are disabled, don’t speak English, or disadvantaged still have an equal right to an education. For the reason of English Language Learner comprehensive span the United States wanted something that could adjust and help as a wide range obligation and or standard required to applied in the educational system, so with the No Child Left behind act allowed it to be done. Since the states have to follow and stand by assessment guidelines as well as academic standards with the No Child Left Behind act people ask exactly how the non- English students would fit into this law. Assessment must also be given with unlimited probability that a student will pass in the regular education curriculums, even though they definitely let each state establish their own specific procedures that met with these…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A 1954 transcript, of the Brown v. Board of Education court case, reveals one of the abounding issues during the long-term struggle to end segregation as it played a significant role in the lives of many Americans of different colors, mainly during the 1950’s and 60’s. Many Americans, around this time, were not only fighting for equal laws, but equal rights, such as the boycotting of buses that followed shortly after this case. Brown v. Board of Education was not a case intended for the court alone, but for America as a whole, in an attempt to make known the disadvantage segregated schools has for children and the rights being violated. A transcript, like this one, can be useful to a historian because it is a primary source, meaning it will…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immigrant students face the challenge of English learning to participate fully in an English speaking world. They face the pressure of academic subjects before they become fully proficient in English. The U.S. Supreme Court in Lau v. Nichols (1974) and the civil rights act of (1964) addressed this problem and defining the school's obligation to take affirmative steps to overcome immigrant students language barriers and provide access to education. Immigrant students need to develop the linguistic, cultural and cognitive skills necessary to succeed in the United…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defense Attorneys

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fradella, H. F., Neubaubauer, D.W. (2011). America’s court and the criminal justice system (10th Edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lau Vs Lechols

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page

    In 1964 Lau vs. Nichols case decided that the lack of supplemental language instruction for the ESOL learners in schools was a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This case forced schools to cooperate with the terms in order to ensure secondary language learners had language instruction. This gave opportunity for more teachers because more jobs were needed to teach ESOL…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plyler V Doe

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When state and local governments try to pass restrictions for education based on legality of the student they are, for the most part, brought to a halt by the court system. The courts cite Plyler v Doe, but why? What does Plyler v Doe do for undocumented students?…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is general concern by all stakeholders in legal fraternity that the language proficiency in the practice of law has dramatically dropped. It is against this background, that I am of the view emphases should be placed on the proficiency in English to enable those practicing the law to be able to convey the arguments in a clear and acceptable expression of the language.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays