Preview

law chart

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1376 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
law chart
University of Phoenix Material

Employment Laws Chart

Complete the chart below using information from the weekly readings and additional research if necessary.

Employment Law

Description and Requirement of Law
Court Case Influential to Establishment of Law

Importance of Law

Workplace Application

Civil Rights Act of 1964

“Prohibits discrimination in all employment decisions on basis of race, religion, ethnicity, sex, and national origin.” (DeCenzo, Robbins, & Verhulst 2013).
In Griggs v. Duke Power Co., the Supreme Court ruled that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits not only intentional job discrimination, but also employer practices that have a discriminatory effect on minorities and women. The Court held that tests and other employment practices that disproportionately screened out African American applicants for jobs at the Duke Power Company were prohibited when the tests were not shown to be job-related
This law is important because it gives every person applying for a job equal rights.
An employee cannot be discriminated against for being Catholic. An employee has the right to choose their religion and to not be discriminated against.

Equal Employment Opportunity Act

The Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 is the act which gives the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) authority to sue in federal courts when it finds reasonable cause to believe that there has been employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. In the case of public employment, the EEOC refers the matter to the United States Attorney General to bring the lawsuit.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973). In that case, the Court held that a plaintiff could prove an individual case of intentional discrimination, or disparate treatment, under Title VII, by showing four factors.
This law is important because it supports fairness at work
An employee can sue if they were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color, as well as national origin, sex, religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state, government, employment agencies, labor organizations and federal government jobs.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tanglewood Case 3

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ms. Riyadh could argue this is a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Ms. Riyadh could also argue that she was promised she would be promoted in 2 years provided she did a good job. I’m sure the company was aware of her religious beliefs was when she started. Ms. Riyadh received outstanding evaluations and outperformed her male counterparts. She has also won three national awards. According to the Glass Ceiling Commission it is recommended that businesses commit to…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC) is one the result of the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, also known as Title VII. The primary purpose of the EEOC is to provide employees and prospective employees with a legal recourse to ensure fair and equal consideration with respect to employment and termination. Among other things, the law prohibits employers from basing the hiring or firing of an individual on factors such as race, age, religion, national origin, color or sex. When an individual feels that his rights under Title VII have been violated, he may file a claim against the company. The following paragraphs will outline the claims process of the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission and also the civil litigation process from the State level to the Supreme Court.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Dunlap VS Tennessee Valley Authority, the legal issue that was presented was discrimination, disparate treatment and disparate impact. According to the EEOC, race discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because he/she is of a certain race or because of personal characteristics associated with race (such as hair texture, skin color, or certain facial features). Color discrimination involves treating someone unfavorably because of skin color complexion. The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects workers from discrimination, and when it comes to the case, discrimination was seen in many ways.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Griggs v. Duke Power Company was a landmark case regarding discrimination in the workplace. Duke Power Company was known for discriminating against blacks during the hiring process by only allowing them to work in it’s labor department which was the lowest paying position. After the Civil Rights Act was passed, obviously the company was no longer allowed to discriminate legally based on race. However, the company became sneaky and required a high school diploma for employment. This, in turn eliminated a lot of potential black employees because a majority of them did not have high school diplomas. This really became an issue when Griggs applied for a position, but it was denied because he did not…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    JDT Task1 Essay Example

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In our company’s case the former employee alleges that enforcement of company’s new shift policy is discriminatory because the policy requires employees to work on a religious holy day.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex . This law provides legal recourse for employees to seek Constructive Discharge for discrimination of their legal rights if they believe a change to a policy or procedure has violated their rights (Shaker, n.d.). The law specific to religious beliefs applies to this situation that has occurred within the company.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination of employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin (see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2[31]). Title VII also prohibits discrimination against an individual because of his or her association with another individual of a particular race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. An employer cannot discriminate against a person because of his interracial association with another, such as by an interracial marriage.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Answer: The equal employment opportunity was a major amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which addressed issues of employment. Said employment should be free from any type of discrimination that included the assumption that was based on race, color, religion, creed, sex and national origin.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disparate treatment prohibits employers from treating applicants or employees differently because of their membership in a class protected by Title VII. The central issue is whether the employer's actions were motivated by discriminatory intent, which may be proved by either direct or circumstantial evidence. Disparate treatment is considered intentional discrimination and the employer may not say they are discriminating. The U.S. Supreme Court has a list of indicators that leave discrimination as the only explanation when every other explanation is eliminated: (1) The plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination; (2) the employer must then articulate, through admissible evidence, a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions; and (3) in order to prevail, the plaintiff must prove that the employer's stated reason is a pretext to hide discrimination. (http://www.hr-guide.com/data/G701.htm. This is called direct method - burden-shifting. In disparate treatment cases, the employer's policy is discriminatory on its face (Bennett-Alexander and Hartman, 95). McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green 411 U.S. 792 (1973) is a case that shows disparate…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EEOC FINAL PAPER

    • 3184 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The United States government has formed many important regulatory agencies that have significantly influenced business in the United States. The regulatory agencies are required to oversee legislation that was put into effect by the government and protect the rights of citizens. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is a regulatory agency that was created in response to the Civil Rights Movement. The EEOC protects individuals against discrimination of race, gender, sex, etc. in the workforce. Wal-Mart, one of the largest corporations in the United States, has had many complaints filed by the EEOC regarding discrimination in the workforce. The resolutions from these cases demonstrate the changes and effects a regulatory agency can impose by upholding legislation in the United States of America.…

    • 3184 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employment Laws Chart

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Complete the chart below using information from the weekly readings and additional research if necessary.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title III Research Paper

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was the largest march in the United States history and citizens of all colors and race pull together to demonstrate to the legislature no longer will racism be tolerated in the United States culture. The Title VII section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was implemented to prohibit discrimination within the workforce. Rapidly, the Title VII laws became a vital arbitrator of rights (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2001 p 115). Ever since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title VII were passed the working environment has significantly changed. There are more minorities and women employees than ever before. Title VII offered protection against discrimination within the work place for people of all religion, national origin, race, color, or gender. This created the foundation to promoted fairness in employment and also provided an opportunity to supply protection against discrimination based on age and disability (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2001. P…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A, §§ 2000e-2000e-17, is undoubtedly the most well-known of the statutory exceptions. (Employment At-Will in Pennsylvania: Don 't Have the Tables Turned Against You!) Title VII prevents termination on the basis of a person’s race, creed, color, sex, or national origin. In addition, it also precludes an employer for negatively retaliating against any employee who makes a claim under this…

    • 2955 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays