Legislation has always been a controversial topic when it comes to whether it has been implemented correctly and effectively or not. It can be found in many communities where a crime has occurred, that the ruled society (the people) disagree with the punishment and/or ruling the court has decided upon the accused. Many views are the courts are not regulated enough and the judicial role-players have been unable to sustain their integrity and honour, ultimately taking in their own opinion to decide upon a ruling against the accused. Heydon expressed that ‘The expression “judicial activism” is here used to mean using judicial power for a purpose other than that for which it was granted’ . This explores the point that the courts are only meant to use their powers to implement punishments/judgements only for the benefit of the popular will, and not for their own interpretation of the law.
In order for legislation and typical behavioural norm rules to be effective, the courts and the rulers of the court must stay impartial to their own opinions and make judgements on behalf of the community values, rather than their own. Unfortunately the current general trend of the courts is found to be the opposite of their purpose, rendering them useless to effectively make radical legal