Question 1 (5 points) James believes our system of free enterprise is the best, even though businesses are not exactly trying to do nice things to competitors, because the end result is that consumers get better products. "Hey, even though what the businesses are doing is kind of cruel, the ultimate outcome is for the good—what could be wrong with that?" Chris disagrees with James: "No way will you'll get me to go along with that analysis, James, right is right and wrong is wrong. If a businessman is trying to run a competitor out of business, the intentions are all wrong—I don't care about end results." Philosophically, what is the best description of the arguments of James and Chris respectively?
Question 1 options:
James is teleological, Chris is deontological.
James is deontological, Chris is teleological.
Both James and Chris have arguments best described as teleological.
Neither argument is teleological or deontological.
Save
Question 2 (5 points) Tanisha is suing Fred, seeking money damages for the destruction that Fred caused to her lawn by continually driving across it with his pickup. Tanisha wants to have her attorney sit down with Fred in a conference room and ask him questions in person, so as to gather evidence, with a person representing the court present who will type down all that is said. What type of discovery is Tanisha seeking here?
Question 2 options:
Interrogatory
Deposition
Request for production of evidence
This type of discovery fits within the category of an interrogatory, discovery and request for production of eivdence.
Save
Question 3 (5 points) Tim, a graduate of the Georgia State University MBA program, entered into employment with IBM. After working for IBM for three years, he was fired. Tim filed suit in a Texas trial court for wrongful termination. The clerk at the court told him that according to state law, he must pursue