Preview

Laws of Evidence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2574 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Laws of Evidence
Memorandum
To:
From:
Date: 08/31/2012
Re: Laws of Evidence Assignment #2
Statement of Assignment
You have asked me to analyze and determine whether the evidence that prosecution would like to introduce at trial can be admitted based on the Federal Rules of Evidence. Pursuant to your request, this memo includes my analysis, reasoning, and conclusions regarding the admissibility of such evidence.
Statement of Facts
The defendant was prosecuted for the murder of his wife. The victim’s body was never recovered, no murder weapon was ever found, and there were no witnesses to the crime. At trial, prosecution would like to introduce the following as evidence: 1. A computer disk, found in the defendant’s desk, that contains a file named “murder” which appears to be a twenty six step guide on how to carry out a murder. 2. A witness who will testify that two days prior to the victim’s disappearance, the defendant purchased a .25 caliber pistol. 3. A witness who will testify that the defendant told him that the best way to kill someone else was to shoot them behind the ear. 4. A witness who will testify that the defendant told her that she shouldn’t be surprised if six months down the road… “you hear that Shirley is dead because I am going to kill her.” 5. A witness who will testify that the defendant asked him how he could remove blood from concrete. 6. A witness who will testify that the defendant told her that there might be bodies hidden in the mine shafts in Pennsylvania, and that if he wanted to get rid of his wife, nobody would ever see her again.
Defense objects to this evidence being introduced, claiming that it is irrelevant and more prejudicial than probative.

ISSUES PRESENTED

Based on the Federal Rules of Evidence, Rules 401, 402, and 403…. I. Is the computer disk that contains a twenty six step guide on how to carry out a murder and was found in the defendant’s desk admissible evidence in this case? II. Is a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this case study I will examine the forensic evidence (limited to the main ballistic evidence), that was presented in the criminal trials and the forensic evidence that was introduced by the prosecution.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justin King Case Study

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, requests that the defendant answer the following Interrogatories fully, under oath and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (FRCP), title V, Rule 33.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    8)Did the court find that there were sufficient parts and instructions available to conclude that the defendant did, in fact, possess an illegal weapon?…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic evidence has been used since the beginning of investigating. It could be anything from ammunition, to a handprint on the door, to the drops of blood on the crime scene. As seen in “Forensic Evidence” by Andrea Campbell, the indisputable forensic evidence is the best kind to use in a trial.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Barnett Case Study

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mary Barnett, the mother of a six month old daughter, left for San Francisco to see her fiancé. Leaving her daughter behind, she returned seven days later to find her child dead. After calling the police and telling them she left the child with a baby sitter, she later told them this was not true and that she left the daughter on purpose knowing the consequences. A trial was then conducted to determine if she would be convicted of second degree murder and be sentenced to 18 years. The witnesses and information they provided was laid before me and I am to determine with the evidence presented whether Mary Barnett is rightfully guilty or not guilty.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    witness planning sheet

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If you are a defendant, obviously you are arguing that you’re innocent. If you are a witness, decide whether or not you think your respective defendant is guilty. If you think s/he is guilty, work with the prosecution. If you think s/he is innocent, work with the defense.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This process is where witnesses are called to give their statements. They are questioned and cross examined by all lawyers/attorneys. Cross examination is being questioned by each lawyer/attorney they may ask the same questions but in different words. The prosecutor is there to make the jury believe the criminal is guilty whereas the defense attorney is there to make the jury question if the criminal is really guilty. There are also three types of witnesses which are; ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses. “Ordinary witnesses can testify only as to their personal observations. Expert witnesses, on the other hand, are allowed to offer their opinions in their area of expertise. Chartacter witnesses may testify only to the general good reputation of the defendant” (Zalman,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cj227 Unit 4 Project

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since John was in custody, what are the procedural steps the police were required to take once John began to incriminate himself? The police have no obligation to stop John Doe from making any statements. “Excited Utterance” made by a defendant before being questioned are admissible as statements given under Miranda advisement. Once the police begin to question John Doe regarding the theft, then they are required to read or provide Mr. Doe with his Miranda Warnings. Miranda rights (Miranda rule, Miranda warning) n. the requirement set by the U. S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Alabama (1966) that prior to the time of arrest and any interrogation of a person suspected of a crime, he/she must be told that he/she has: "the right to remain silent, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be told that anything he/she says can be used in court against" him/her. Further, if the accused person confesses to the authorities, the prosecution must prove to the judge that the defendant was informed of them and knowingly waived those rights, before the confession can be introduced in the defendant's criminal trial. The warnings are known as "Miranda Rights" or just "rights." The Miranda rule supposedly prevents self-incrimination in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. Sometimes there is a question of admissibility of answers to questions made by the defendant before he/she was considered a prime suspect, raising a factual issue as to what is a prime suspect and when does a person become such a suspect?…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: * Byrd, M. (2001). Crime Scene Evidence: A Guide to the Recovery and Collection of Physical…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The key witness in this trial, a woman who lived across the street from the crime scene, claims to have seen this act. This…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prosecution can expose whether Witness and Defendant have colluded in an effort to mislead the jury, or, conversely, can clear an innocent defendant. In sum, by granting use immunity and assuming Witness' truthfulness, 2 1 we can avoid the two flaws of convicting an innocent defendant or freeing a guilty defendant. The state of the law in this area invites several observations about evidentiary and constitutional law. Forbidding Defendant from trying to benefit from Witness' assertion of the fifth amendment is an example of the choice evidence law often makes: to exclude problematic evidence rather than to search for ways to help the jury identify and understand estimation problems. Although the import of Witness' privilege assertion is not pellucid, the court could help the jury more than it does in the typical trial by noting the inferences the jury might draw. 22 Alternatively, as this article suggests in Part V, the law might adopt a model of admissibility loosely drawn from discovery rules. Under this model, Defendant (and perhaps any party) could introduce any relevant evidence as long as he shared it with the prosecution far enough in advance of trial to enable the prosecution to investigate. Finally, we need to ask whether Defendant's sixth amendment right to compulsory process includes the right to try to profit from Witness' fifth amendment privilege assertion. Arguably, the sixth amendment topples the categorical rule that no litigant, not even the…

    • 4738 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Testimony

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hello judges, jurors, and everyone else present in this court room today. My name is Dr. Alyssa Diaz and I am an expert witness. I was called here to testify on this court case. Also I am here to inform you how examining a piece of hair from a suspect from a crime can help to find out who actually did commit the crime. There are some basic things that people should know about hair.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both circumstantial and direct evidence are acceptable to prove or disprove the elements of a charge necessary to a conviction.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that the evidence would be not admissible in court since, the person stating the evidence was not directly involved, but overheard a conversation.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Mr. Simpson

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After a close cross-examination of the witness’s testimonies, prosecutor Clark declined to present them to the jury (Hastie 197). The witness was forced to accept her uncertainty of the precise time she saw Simpson’s Bronco outside the…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays