Preview

Laws That Contradict

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1004 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Laws That Contradict
| State Laws That Contradicts Federal Laws | Which One Must We Fallow? | |

|

State Laws That Contradict Federal Laws
Abstract:
This Paper explains using proof and some facts from researched sites and articles on the internet using sites like Google as a research source.This also going to show some views that the people have on this subject. We will see information and ideas on this topic (How state Laws Contradict Federal Laws) there all going to be different opinions because we all have different views on this question (Which One Should Fallow.? ). I’m here to open your mind and interest you in this subject to see what your opinion is on this. This article will explain you this. You will see 1 article on a situation of wen a state law contradicts a federal law and 2 view of what people think we should do each one of course different. This paper will answer some questions we might ask of or think of. Hope you catch some interest and hope it opens a new perspective to you and you get interested in this topic.

State Laws That Contradict Federal Laws
Questions we might have and ask in our minds here are some than again this is on some web pages online you can think otherwise you will see examples throughout this report and see why people might say this. Every question will be answered and you will see examples
What happens if a state law contradicts the US Constitution or a federal law?
What happens when a state law conflicts with a federal law?
If a state law conflicts with a federal law which law will prevail?
Which should we fallow?
In case a person violets one of this laws by doing another what happens? These and more questions can be in our mind and yeah we want an answer to this so I’ll try to a answer these and more.
Get ready to learn some stuff we didn’t know.

State Laws That Contradict Federal Laws
A very important state law that contradicts federal law is the prescribed marijuana. In some states they have

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case McCulloch vs. Maryland the main conflict was whether if the state government could interfere with national government laws. The state of Maryland had imposed a tax on the…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Busn 115 Week 1 Analysis

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Generally, federal laws apply to citizens living in the U.S. and its regions. The state laws apply just to residents of the particular state. The president of United States is accountable for implementing and accomplishing the laws written by the congress. The federal courts verify these laws according to the U.S constitution. The authorized federal agency discloses a final rule in the federal register with a particular date for when the rule will become effective and enforceable. State legislatures generate and pass bills and then the state governor converts them into laws. The state courts may analyze these laws according the rules of state’s…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court through Chief Justice Marshall has shown that the constitution is more superior than the federal law. No place in the constitution affirms the words Justice Marshall proclaimed. In making his judgment, Marshall stated that “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” There is no mention of such words in the Constitution, but it has come to the attention of the courts that whenever there is a conflict of law, the constitution is always supreme (Murphy,…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court case, United States v. Lopez, was the first Unites States Supreme Court case in a long time, since the early 1930’s, that confines the power of congress. Which functions the importance of the relationship between the federal government and the states. The National and State government both share similarities in which they create and enforce laws. The United States has been dependent on sharing powers with the Federal government and individual State government. However, many cases have been able to represent the arbitrary to the allocation of powers. This case in particular showed that Congress was way over their power for controlling a public school district.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State constitutions, however, tend to show deviation from the structure of federal rule maintained by the U.S. Constitution. In the case of the Nevada State Constitution, there is ample evidence that this document sets forth a policy of law that is far more “democratic” in tone and in application than the Constitution. There are strong similarities between the two documents. Both, for example, stress the rights of the citizenry and even focus on issues such as the “right to assemble” and the citizenry’s ability to refuse to quarter citizens in their homes upon order from the government. Yet when the workings of the legislative, executive, and judicial systems are investigated, it is clear that Nevada’s state constitution deviates dramatically from the U.S. Constitution. While both share these three separate designations of political power, and while there is the unstated intention that these branches are intended to keep the other within check, there are differences which suggest a greater degree of democratic control over each area therein.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court made a judgment that affected the California users of medical marijuana. Under a law the federal Controlled Substance Act, marijuana is a schedule one controlled substance, however under a 1996 state California law, marijuana is legalized for usage for people who have a prescription from a doctor for medical usage. When the federal Drug Enforcement Administration enforced the CSA by destroying one of the defendant's marijuana plants, the defendants claimed that their constitutional rights were infringed upon.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the state has legalized the use of medical marijuana then the federal government should not have the power to come in and have you arrested for having it. Yes, I know that the federal government’s power is far more greater than the state government but that still does not make it fair that if the state allows you to use medical marijuana you can still get arrested for having it. It would be a different story if you was selling the marijuana or misusing it, but if you are taking it as prescribed then I see no need in being charged for having medical marijuana when it is being prescribed to you…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case of Arizona v. United States is a Supreme Court case dealing with the issue of the state of Arizona trying to enact laws against illegal aliens inside the state’s borders. These previsions implemented by the state of Arizona conflicted with the Federal Government, by infringing upon the right of the government to exclusively regulate immigration. This paper will discuss facts, and explain some issues having to do with immigration laws within the United States and its conflict with the state of Arizona. It will go over the actual opinion as well as opinions from the justices. It will conclude with the pros and cons of the decision of Arizona v. United States.…

    • 2814 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The heart of the constitution is the National Supremacy Clause, which states that the constitution and federal laws are the "supreme Law of the Land," meaning it is superior to the law of the states. I personally do not think that the federal laws should always supersede state laws, but there can be times in which the federal government wants the entire country on the same page and they can use their power to do so. The federal government should create laws that effects, and sometimes benefits the country as a whole. The states, on the other hand, should create laws that are unique to the people living in them that do not interfere with the laws set by the federal government.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In California, which has led the way for medical marijuana policies, there have been several cases of people growing marijuana under the state law and still being prosecuted by the federal government. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and other federal agencies regularly conduct raids on dispensaries, leading to some conflict between state and federal…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    no state may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Composers represent conflicting perspectives through their own unique experiences and values as their political and social contexts. Geoffrey Robertson's self styled memoir 'The Justice Game' written in the late 1900's heavily reflects these conflicting perspectives in the 'Trials of Oz' and 'The Romans in Britain' through the employment of emotive and persuasive language and ridicule in the form of satire to which convey Robertson's view through his eyes. Such conflicts also portrayed in Charles Waterstreet's article' It's a long fickle road to justice' which similar to Robertson's use of persuasive techniques utilizes satire to challenge and question the myopic procedures of the legal system.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though people may not want to hear or prefer not to listen the law is pretty straight forward. When the Federal and State laws collide the Federal law will most likely always win. Example States law says that marijuana has a medical purpose and should be legalized for that purpose only. Federal law does not agree with this and it is denied. Federal law wins.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the history of the United States, there have always been arguments over what power the state governments should have, and the powers the Federal Government should have. More recently there have been instances where the Federal Government was questionable in some of their actions. Today's Federal Government has too much power because issues such as gun control and healthcare would be better handled on the state level.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages

    life . Is it our right to bear arms as North Americans ? Or is it privilege? And…

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays