Preview

Lead with Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
925 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lead with Example
Matthew Vetter
English 101
Professor Melanie Bussiere
September 25th, 2010
A Conflict Of Interest
Stability in a ruler’s morals and ethics are a vital asset to have when ruling a group of people. With similarities shared between the ruler and the common person the ruler will then be able to relate and be more respected amongst the population, as opposed to a ruler who rules with his own self interest at hand. In the piece, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues the many principles of how a prince should and should not rule. In order to rule successfully he states a prince must possess some of the following characteristics; morality, a strong army, strict rule, common ground with his people and also to be widely respected. Machiavelli laid the ground work for many rulers in the future with his modern view in a time where rulers were primitive and ruled through fear and terror. The Prince and its ideas can even be seen today in our modern day presidents and kings proving that Machiavelli had compelling ideas and arguments for how leaders can obtain and hold a position of power successfully. Respect, the most important quality a leader should have, is the basis for any relationship whether it is between friends or a ruler and his people. The prince depicted in Machiavelli’s work has no respect for or from the population and this solely is his major flaw. Machiavelli states, “Spending the wealth of others does not lesson your reputation but adds to it; only spending what is your own is what hurts you”. In order to gain the respect he must forge relationships, sacrifice what is his own and respect the lives of his people. It is seen through his methods of war that he spends the lives of his people frivolously sending them on missions where the fatalities are extremely he high due to the fact he has no care for the population as long as his position is protected from outside enemies . The prince grew up rich, privileged and oblivious to the hardships faced by the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Prince was written by Niccolò Machiavelli while he was in exile. In his efforts to return to politics, Machiavelli wrote the Prince in order to exert the true nature of a successful leader, and once again be in the good graces of the Medici’s who were rising to power in Italy. The Prince reveals what Machiavelli views to be a successful leader. The Prince also reveals how Machiavelli views the nature of humans and how that effects how a dictator/leader should rule. Machiavelli believes human beings are selfish, greedy, easily manipulated, and incapable of self-governing as it often ends in their own demise. “[F]or men change their rulers willingly, hoping to better themselves, and this hope induces them to take up arms against him who rules: wherein they are deceived, because they afterwards find by experience they have gone from bad to worse” (Machiavelli 201). Human selfishness inhibits the individual’s ability to make rational long-term decisions thus deeming them incapable of self-governing. If given the people the right to make their own decisions, their greed ill cloud their judgment and cause them to make decisions that may not be in their best interest. If the society is not capable of self-governing they will need a strong leader and Machiavelli has the recipe for the perfect…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli points out that once the prince is in place he cannot be as foolish as to leave of others in power or to let anyone come to be as powerful as he is. Instead he is either to destroy their power or make it impossible for one to come to power without relying on the prince’s own authority and influence.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a result of Machiavelli’s departure from the ways of old he creates practical methods by which he believes a ruler should abide by to be successful in all matters concerning his ability to obtain and maintain power. Machiavelli designed “The Prince” to function like a guidebook for rulers, and suggests unequivocally that he is not concerned with appealing to the idealistic or imaginary methods of his predecessors. Therefore, he never attempts to sugar coat any of his viewpoints because “The Prince” was intended for practical application. He believed a ruler shouldn’t be burdened by the imaginary constraints society had created, and he must play by his own rules to have total authority. Above all, he wanted to portray the “effectual truths” of mankind as they are, and not how he imagines them to be. Machiavelli makes this point clear when he states, “since my intention is to say something that will prove of practical…

    • 2273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 1 ]. Machiavelli, Niccolo, and Harvey C. Mansfield. The Prince. Second Edition ed. Chicago and London: University of Chicago, 1998. Print.(11),45.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli wrote The Prince (1513) in troubled times when Italy was constantly being invaded and looted by foreigners while Italian city-states failed to unite in defense the country. The Prince, considered as Machiavelli’s most influential work is considered by some as a masterpiece because it depicts the “real human beings” and how a prince (or leader) ought to govern his subjects. Contrarily, others find in Machiavelli an unparalleled wickedness and perversion for a ruthless leader to achieve his ends by any means possible: ‘In the action of rulers, the end justifies the means’. The term Machiavellian is commonly associated to a cold-blooded, crafty, unscrupulous and amoral person ready to do whatever it takes in order to succeed in anything he is involved and ultimately…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Prince is a didactic examination of political power, how to achieve it, maintain it, and expand it. Machiavelli does not take into consideration what is morally right, or amoral, only what is useful and useless. The book is more like a technical manual, and technical manuals only state the facts. The book defines what turns a mere man into a great ruler and what turns a great ruler into a mere man.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Is Henry Machiavellian

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    William Shakespeare and Niccolò Machiavelli are arguably the most gifted writers of the sixteenth century. At times, one cannot help but notice certain parallels between Shakespeare’s plays and many important themes found in Machiavelli’s work, The Prince. In this text Machiavelli gives guidance on how to become a successful leader or ruler and then consolidate that power. One Shakespearean hero that can be considered a Machiavellian is Henry in Shakespeare’s famous play Henry V. He can be considered a hero because of how he was able to use his Renaissance prince qualities to better his country.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli describes the relationship between the ordinary citizens and the nobles, which are the upper classes from aristocratic families. The nobles want to oppress the people, and the people want only to avoid oppression. As a result, of the opposition between the two groups results in the establishment of anarchy. The prince comes to power through the favor of his fellow citizens and it is important that a prince created by the people must retain the people’s loyalty. On the other hand, if the prince is created by the nobles must still win the people’s affection because they will always serve as protection.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was a political observer – he drew conclusions based on the historical evidence and experiences of past leaders and compiled all that he had learned into a manual, or handbook, titled The Prince, which at that time was generally a ‘how-to’ essay for princes on how to attain power and maintain power. Instead of constructing ideas of how things should be in a theoretical or imaginary world, Machiavelli much preferred a realistic analysis of how things actually were in the real world. Machiavelli was a firm believer that the best way to achieve power and to keep it was to follow the advice and actions of those who had succeed, and to avoid the actions of those who had failed – one must refrain from repeating the past mistakes of…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He states, “A prince must nevertheless make himself feared in such a manner that he will avoid hatred, even if he does not acquire love; since to be feared and not be hated can very well be combined; and this will always be so when he keeps his hands off the property and the women of his citizens and his subjects” (340). In making this statement, Machiavelli discerns the nature of human beings once more and encourages future princes to avoid disrespecting their people. A prince should never expropriate the property of his subjects or take their women, since such actions are most likely to breed hatred. This argument is justifiable and will produce the most productivity amongst citizens because people will generally work harder through fear, but will rarely produce properly through hatred. Despite Machiavelli’s notion of avoiding animosity, he urges the prince not to be tormented by what his subjects may think of his actions and to act only in the way that will result in the greater approval from other people in the…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Prince” is an extraordinary work by Nicolo Machiavelli that is timeless in its discussion on ruling nations. The fundamental question branches out to much of the discussion in “The Prince” is whether it is better for a ruler to be feared or loved. According to Machiavelli, it would be desired for a ruler to be able to balance his or her level of love and hatred from the country. However, Machiavelli believes that the nature of man is “ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, [and] covetous.” Therefore, Machiavelli says that it is safer to be feared. Yet, he does still give tremendous merit towards being loved. The final matter is that no matter what approach a ruler decides to take, he or she must remain faithful to that approach, make…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli The Prince

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Prince is sometimes claimed to be one of the first works of modern philosophy, especially modern political philosophy, in which the effective truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal. It was also in direct conflict with the dominant Catholic and scholastic doctrines of the time concerning how to consider politics and ethics. The Prince is sometimes claimed to be one of the first works of modern philosophy, especially modern political philosophy, in which the effective truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays