Leadership Models
Leadership Models
Leadership Models The dynamics of leadership-follower relationships has grown in the last two decades because of a growing discussion in leadership literature (Popper & Mayseless, 2002) as cited in Avolio. Many companies, which were small 20 years ago have emerged as leaders in the market, overtaking their once larger competitors. These firms internally have revamped the way they do business. They have focused on making changes to their managerial process, thereby creating a competitive advantage (Tichy & Devanna, 1990). The authors go on to say that although traditional managerial skills are important they are not sufficient to bring about organizational transformation. Transformational change will come by incorporating new strategies about people and the structure of the firm. These strategies may include leadership models or theories. A number of leadership models or theories exist, which address change in the way a firm addresses the management of its employees. The contingency view of leadership states there is not a particular model of leadership that is better than another, but rather various situational contingencies determine the success of different types and styles of leadership (Nahavandi, 2006). Of the many number of leadership models four are notable for change. These four consist of trait theory, behavioral theory, charismatic approach to leadership, and the cognitive resource model. A discussion of how each model addresses contemporary leadership issues and challenges follows. The trait approach to leadership has been referred to as the “Great Man” approach, which includes identifying specific traits a person exhibits. Those traits would be used to identify that person as either a potential leader or as a follower. Researchers have spent considerable time attempting to identify traits that would help to identify leaders from followers. Clawson (2006) states that whereas there have been many
Leadership Models The dynamics of leadership-follower relationships has grown in the last two decades because of a growing discussion in leadership literature (Popper & Mayseless, 2002) as cited in Avolio. Many companies, which were small 20 years ago have emerged as leaders in the market, overtaking their once larger competitors. These firms internally have revamped the way they do business. They have focused on making changes to their managerial process, thereby creating a competitive advantage (Tichy & Devanna, 1990). The authors go on to say that although traditional managerial skills are important they are not sufficient to bring about organizational transformation. Transformational change will come by incorporating new strategies about people and the structure of the firm. These strategies may include leadership models or theories. A number of leadership models or theories exist, which address change in the way a firm addresses the management of its employees. The contingency view of leadership states there is not a particular model of leadership that is better than another, but rather various situational contingencies determine the success of different types and styles of leadership (Nahavandi, 2006). Of the many number of leadership models four are notable for change. These four consist of trait theory, behavioral theory, charismatic approach to leadership, and the cognitive resource model. A discussion of how each model addresses contemporary leadership issues and challenges follows. The trait approach to leadership has been referred to as the “Great Man” approach, which includes identifying specific traits a person exhibits. Those traits would be used to identify that person as either a potential leader or as a follower. Researchers have spent considerable time attempting to identify traits that would help to identify leaders from followers. Clawson (2006) states that whereas there have been many
References: Awamleh, R., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery and organizational performance. Leadership Quarterly, (10), 345-373. Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London, Sage Publications Callan, S Clawson, J. (2006). Leadership theories. : Prentice-Hall, Inc . Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: percieved behavioral attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 439-452. Farris, D. (2002). (Kotter, J.P. & Cohen, D. S. ) (2002)The heart of change: Real life stories of how people change their organizations. Library Journal 127.11, 77. June 15, 2002. Maccoby, M. (1981). The leader. New York: Ballantine. Medina, F. J. (2004). Power and authority in leadership. In Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, Seville, Spain, Elsevier, Inc. Retrieved on March 14, 2010 from www.credoreference.com Nahavandi, A Sahal, S. K. (1979). Contingency theories of leadership: A study. Human Relations, 32,4, pp 313-322. doi: 10.1177/001872677903200404 Simons, T Stogdill, R. M. (1981). Stogdill’s handbook of leadership, revised and expanded by Bernard M. Bass. New York: The Free Press. Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1990). The transformational leader: The key to global competitiveness. : John Wiley and Sons, Inc.