Preview

Legacy Of Hate Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
713 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legacy Of Hate Analysis
Legacy of Hate: The Conquest of Mexico’s NorthWest
1. The chapter started off with the author explaining how the USA invaded and Mexico and not the other way around; many Euro-Americans are offended and ignorant at this fact. Even the author’s history professor told him he was lying about the USA invading Mexico. The author’s purpose is to show the people of the history behind Mexico and USA. As Mexico separated from the Spaniards and were finally at their own, it was hard for them build a nation that would unite them since Mexico was made up of many races mostly Native Americans. Because Mexico was busy trying build a nation their hold on Texas was not stable. The USA begin to expand their territory with states like Florida, central Illinois, southern Georgia, they wanted more land, especially Texas. The USA began to invade Texas claiming it theirs and later on began to invade other lands from either Mexico or Latin America. This contributed to Mexico’s bankruptcy and the dependence they have with their military leaders, whom they believe would set things back in order.

2. At the beginning Mexico allowed white colonist to migrate to Texas as
…show more content…
One major point the chapter made was how the “Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo” was not honored by the United States. Like I mention earlier the treaty was made because Mexico lost the war and had no other choice but sell half their land for $15 million. The treaty also protected Mexican citizen’s rights, land titles, and religion. Mexicans had to choose in a year whether to stay in the United States or to leave for their homeland, about 2,000 left. However, even though Trist signed the treaty, U.S call the treaty worthless because supposedly Trist did not have the authority to so. “What is amazing is that Polk’s diary clearly shows that he considered the treaty valid” (Acuna, 52). The United States considered Mexicans apart from the dominant race. The obligations the treaty made to the United States were nearly all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Synthesis Essay

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The united states deprived the people of mexico of the land that was rightfully theirs. According to document c it states that the Mexican referred to the was as the United States invasion. A quote from “El…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PORTSMOUTH – On a cold, wet, winter day people departed their warm downtown offices and businesses. They wasted no time getting to their cars, trying their best to beat rush-hour traffic.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq Essay

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    - Polk describes his perspective on the war with Mexico he explains that he originally tried to negotiate peacefully with Mexico by sending in various people to negotiate with the Mexican government and governor such as Mr. Slidell. But the Mexican government never negotiated with the USA delegates send to the Mexico.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil,” said President Polk (doc B). When troops arrived at the Rio Del Norte, Mexican troops attacked the Americans, killing and wounding sixteen soldiers. (Hook) This was the deciding factor of America going to war with Mexico. “When word arrived on May 9, 1846, that Mexicans soldiers had fired upon Americans on the “Texas side” of the Rio Grande, president Polk had a reason for going to war.” (BG essay) You see, if Mexico hadn’t engaged in violence first there would be no immediate reason for the U.S. to go to war with…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He explains how the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and the addition of California served as an American “conquest” for Mexican land because the total land acquired “amounted to one-half of Mexico” (163). This shows how American ideas, like Manifest Destiny, justified expansionism and the annexation of land that previously belonged to Mexico. Thus, American expansion violated individual land rights and resulted in a major loss of property for Mexico. Takaki also elaborated upon the difficulty of validating land claims when measurements were “loosely marked” and courts required “accurate boundaries and proof of legitimate titles” (167). Mexicans often had difficulty providing such evidence and many resorted to biased lawyers, risky loans, or selling their land. Therefore, because this policy disproportionately affected Mexicans, it was an encroachment on their property…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Do People Push West

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The treaty was signed on February 2, 1848 between the United States and Mexico. In the treaty, Mexico gave up its claims to Texas north of Rio Grande and ceded Alta California and New Mexico. It…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered what the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo actually was? It was a treaty that both America and Mexico signed in order to end a conflict between the 2. Why did President Polk go around Mexico and dock in Mexico instead of going through Texas and Mexico? He did this to have the element of surprise over Mexico instead of attacking them straight on.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At this point some Americans were growing tired of gaining more land and they found that this was necessary. “That the annexation of the whole of Mexico to the United States would be fatal to this government, whoever may doubt it, we are well convinced” (Doc. F). Americans were beginning to expand even more and more trying to get a huge territory. We end up going to war with Mexicans, winning. In Document I when see a picture comparison between the Mexican Eagle before the war which was a strong and mighty eagle in contrast to the Mexican Eagle after the war, plucked to the skin. In Document G, we are presented a cartoon displaying how some anti-Manifest Destiny. In the picture President Polk threw up on Jackson being he has eaten too many “States”. Although having pride in your country is a good thing, but there is a moment where we have to say enough is…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo the is 18 articles and the 1 article says “There shall be firm and universal peace between the United States of America and the Mexican Republic, and between their respective countries, territories, cities, towns, and people, without exception of places or persons.” They (the United States and Mexico) did end the war in peace but their counties, territories, cities, towns, and people didn't have the peace they needed. The reason why they didn't have the peace they wanted was because when the war ended the United States end with the moral superiority and took the stand of manifest destiny and took almost half of Mexico. Therefore the peace that everyone wanted was not there because after the United States had what they want they came up with the citizenship that basically meant that only the citizens where able to go be the the United States and the Mexicans had to be in the Mexico and couldn't pass what is know known as the border. The borders where made of 53 markers and of stones. The United States took control of everything that was once Mexico in the summer of 1846. Persistent Polk said that it was time that Mexico had its own independence but in reality he…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffersonian Democracy

    • 4895 Words
    • 20 Pages

    * The Spanish feared for the future of their tottering Latin American empire, especially the northern provinces of Mexico which stood in the path of American westward expansion.…

    • 4895 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo is an agreement, signed on February 2, 1848, at Guadalupe Hidalgo, which is a city north from the capital of Mexico, between the United States and Mexico that marked the end of the Mexican War. With the defeat of the troops and the fall of the Mexican capital on September 1847, the Mexican government surrendered to the United States and wanted negotiations between the United States to end the war. Signing the treaty was only the beginning of the process because it still had to be approved by the congresses of both the United States and Mexico. No one could tell how the Polk administration would receive a treaty negotiated by an unofficial agent, and could they know the goods and the negative things of the Mexican political scene for the next few months. In both the U.S. and Mexican governments there was opposition to the treaty. In the United States, the northern abolitionists opposed the annexation of Mexican territory. In the Mexican congress, a sizable minority was in favor of continuing the fight. Both countries ratified the document. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo marked the end of the war.…

    • 966 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guadalupe Hidalgo

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, signed in 1948, ended the Mexican-American War. The treaty doubled the size of the United States and halved the size of Mexico, as it stated that Mexico give the United States Texas and accept the Rio Grande as Texas’s boundary, as well as sell New Mexico and Upper California to the United States for fifteen million dollars. Conditions of the treaty included that any Mexicans currently living in the territories that were now owned by the United States could become U.S. citizens and gave the U.S. power to deal with any “problematic” Native Americans on the U.S. side of the border. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo sparked many lasting controversies and political/social issues still present today. Some of the effects of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo are the end of slavery in the United States and the negative stereotypes of Mexicans held by Americans.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mexican Subcultural Group

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was hard for the Mexican to make a decision either to stay in texas or to move back to their homeland Mexico.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays