Preview

Legal Studies Revision Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1161 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Studies Revision Essay
Legal Studies Revision
Law:
1. A set of rules imposed on all members of a community
2. Officially recognised, bound and enforced by persons or organisations like the police / courts
3. We need laws in society because there is a need to keep people safe and sort out disputes

Customs:
1. Collective habits/traditions.
2. Developed in a society over a long period of time.
3. Example: walking on the left hand side.

Rules:
1. Regulations or principles governing procedure or controlling conduct.
Example: School rules.

Equality:
The state or quality of being equal
Having the same rights or status
1. On the surface – means that people should be treated equally
2. On a deeper level – means to be fair and just; you may need to
…show more content…
The right to present your case
2. The right to freedom from bias by decision makers
3. The right to a decision based on logically relevant evidence

Rule of law:
The principle that no one is above the law
Includes government bodies like the prime minister and police members

Anarchy:
The absence of laws and government

Tyranny:
Ruled by a single leader holding absolute power in a nation-state
Example: Muammar Gaddafi – tyrant of Libya

Common Law:
Law made by courts
Historically; law common to England
1. English legal system – used in many countries like Australia, New Zealand, USA, Canada
2. Describes laws made by judges in trials (Precedents)

Origin of Common Law:
William the conqueror took power in England in 1066
Judges were sent out on circuits visiting villages and hearing cases
From time to time, the judges would meet and discuss the cases they heard
The idea of precedents developed Judges should be consistent when hearing similar cases; this is seen as just and fair. In the 14th Century
1. Another court was set up to hear people’s appeals who thought that their original judge had made an unjust
…show more content…
A judgement that is authority for a legal principle and that serves to provide guidance for deciding cases that have similar facts
2. A judgement made by a court that establishes a point of law
a. A new situation or problem comes before the court

Making and Following Precedent:
1. When there has been no previous decision to provide guidance for deciding a case
2. Court must use principles of the existing common law and statute law to make its decision
3. Judges may also look to social developments and common sense.
4. Precedents are less common today because most laws are made by Parliament

Rules of Precedent: Binding precedent
Lower courts are bound to follow decision of superior courts regardless whether of the Judge believes a decision is correct Persuasive precedent
Superior courts do not have to follow decision made in lower courts however they may use them to help make a decision.

Summary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Palko Case Summary

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    case may be overruled. In the case of Palko v. Connecticut, this situation had occurred.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    MGMT 217

    • 2186 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Doctrine where the law of precedent is used in guiding decision making in present cases before the court…

    • 2186 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Davis Case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    . . . Under the doctrine, once an appellate court rules upon a question presented on appeal, litigants and lower courts become bound by the ruling, which is considered to be the law of the case . . . . Not only are lower courts bound by the law of the case, but decisions rendered by a prior appellate panel will generally govern the second appeal at the same appellate level as well, unless the previous decision is incorrect because it is out of keeping with controlling principles announced by a higher court and following the decision would result in manifest injustice.”…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rule: Analyze the court’s opinion and determine the court’s statement of the legal principle that answers the question of law: the “rule”.…

    • 5258 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A decision on a given issue by a court is not binding on an inferior court. False…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law is necessary for the effective operation of a society as it ensures the protection of a population and certifies that justice is fair. The law is essential as if it was non-existent, society would descend to anarchy. The law is in place to protect the whole of society, especially weaker individuals or groups within a community. Another reason that law is fundamental, is it provides equity and fairness within society; however, this is not always accurate as a number of aspects can result in an inequality such as an individual’s financial status, or a language barrier. This can be supported through various media files regarding legal processes, concepts and outcomes.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    HUMR 1001P

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    previous cases and the application of their judgement to a present case, basic way judges make their decisions in the common law system…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While I accept that theoretically a judge should not consider extralegal factors when making a ruling, I cannot accept your premise that all judges rule as neutral arbiters who rely solely on precedent, Constitutional text, and original intent of the Framers. As with any other individual in public service, judges are still human beings, and thus bring with them their own prejudices, personal biases, and preconceived notions when taking the bench.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    law assessment

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Judicial precedent refers to the sources of law where past decisions made by judges create law for future judges to follow. An example would be the Donoghue vs Stevenson case, where Stevenson had bought ginger beer, and Donoghue had drank it after their been a decomposed snail in it, however their was no charge because she was not in a contract with the seller, as she did not purchase the drinks. However a duty of care was owed.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employment Tribunal Report

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages

    They are bound by the decisions of superior courts and appellate tribunals. Appellate and Employment appeal tribunals are bound by the decisions that are made by the Supreme Court but they would usually be required to being bound to the decisions that they made themselves (English legal systems, Richard Ward and Amanda Akhtar 11th edition).…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BusinessLawNotes

    • 2580 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Decisions of a higher court binds a lower court in the same hierarchy, it may be in most cases be overridden by legislation…

    • 2580 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on stare decisis. That is the standing by of previous decisions. Once a point of law has been decided in a particular case, that law must be applied in all future cases containing the same material facts.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Common Law

    • 14781 Words
    • 60 Pages

    Common law, also known as case law or precedent, is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals rather than through legislative statutes or executive branch action. A "common law system" is a legal system that gives great precedential weight to common law,[1] on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar facts differently on different occasions.[2] The body of precedent is called "common law" and it binds future decisions. In cases where the parties disagree on what the law is, an idealized common law court looks to past precedential decisions of relevant courts. If a similar dispute has been resolved in the past, the court is bound to follow the reasoning used in the prior decision (this principle is known as stare decisis). If, however, the court finds that the current dispute is fundamentally distinct from all previous cases (called a "matter of first impression"), judges have the authority and duty to make law by creating precedent.[3] Thereafter, the new decision becomes precedent, and will bind future courts. In practice, common law systems are considerably more complicated than the idealized system described above. The decisions of a court are binding only in a particular jurisdiction, and even within a given jurisdiction, some courts have more power than others. For example, in most jurisdictions, decisions by appellate courts are binding on lower courts in the same jurisdiction and on future decisions of the same appellate court, but decisions of lower courts are only non-binding persuasive authority. Interactions between common law, constitutional law, statutory law and regulatory law also give rise to considerable complexity. However stare decisis, the principle that similar cases should be decided according to consistent principled rules so that they will reach similar results, lies at the heart of all common law systems. Common law legal systems are in widespread use, particularly in…

    • 14781 Words
    • 60 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do Judges Make Law

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lower courts do not have the authority to make judge-made law. Only judges operating in appellate and other high courts are able to set legal precedents by either changing the way the courts interpret a law, or offering a new interpretation that expands an existing law. Judges cannot invent laws out of whole cloth; they must be able to provide clear legal rationales for their decisions, with supporting information in the form of decisions in single cases.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law Essay

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Title: Using the knowledge of principle and rule used by judges to interpret statute, and comment on Derek situation.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics