A common argument is that we will be using the poor as “spare body parts” and that this practice is a violation of human rights. It’s the donor’s body. No one is forcing the donor to give up body parts. What the donor chooses to do with body parts is the donor’s business and nobody else’s. If a person his own body, then rich or poor, he should have the right to sell his organs if he chooses (Clark). It truly should be the donor’s choice, and nobody else’s. For the government to tell someone they cannot sell a part of their own body, is against human rights more than anything else. All the evidence clearly points to legalizing the sale of human
A common argument is that we will be using the poor as “spare body parts” and that this practice is a violation of human rights. It’s the donor’s body. No one is forcing the donor to give up body parts. What the donor chooses to do with body parts is the donor’s business and nobody else’s. If a person his own body, then rich or poor, he should have the right to sell his organs if he chooses (Clark). It truly should be the donor’s choice, and nobody else’s. For the government to tell someone they cannot sell a part of their own body, is against human rights more than anything else. All the evidence clearly points to legalizing the sale of human