Preview

Legitimacy of Use of Force in International Relations

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legitimacy of Use of Force in International Relations
NAME: Abraham Kuol Nyuon

NUMBER: 1261936

WORDS: 1,499

MODULE: Warfare and International Relations, 7SSWM178, Term 3, 12-13

TITLE: How ‘global’ is the principle of legitimacy in international relations?

ASSIGNMENT TYPE: Short Essay

How ‘global’ is the principle of legitimacy in international relations? There is an increase debate among sovereign states, NGOs, INGOs, CSO, UN and other international organization on the legitimacy of the use of office in the international relations for self-defense, pre-emptive attack and humanitarian intervention. This essay will investigate the globality of the principle of legitimacy in the international Relations. This will be done by examining the historical development of the use of force, the legal standards for use of force and practical example of the use of force which qualify the principle of the legitimacy of the use of force in the global perspective as follows.

Firstly, the principle of the legitimacy of the use of force in the international relations can be traced back to the time of Aquinas and Grotius who strongly believes that, the rules governing the application for use of force in the society are obvious and simply governed by primitive societies.1 Therefore, Aquinas and Grotius were support by Brownlie who spelt out that norms are vital in the application of force in the international system through exploration of the concept of just war theory advanced by Cicero and Aquinas who says, war can be justified on three basis such as the application by authority of the sovereign state, for the just course and done for right intention.2 Moreover, another phase in the development was during the period of the league of nations as emphasized by Blokker wrote that, the League of Nations was established to regulate great wars in order to avoid the escalation of unwanted wars by surprise to sovereign States, in his view, this international institution was mandated to regulate the utilization of force in



Bibliography: Amstutz, M, R (1999), International Ethics: Concepts, Theories, and Cases in Global Politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Arend, A, C and Beck, R, J (1993), International Law and the Use of Force: Beyond the UN Charter Paradigm, London: Routledge Publishers. Bjola, C, O (2007), Legitimating the Use of Force in International Politics: A Communicative Action Perspective, Toronto: University of Toronto. Blokker, N and Scrijver, N (2005), The security Council and Use of force, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Brownlie, I (1963), International Law and use of force by States, London: Clarendon Press. Cecil, R (1941), A great Experiment, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Clark, I (2003), Legitimacy in a Global Order, Review of International Studies, No.29, Pp.75-95. Coates, A.J (1997), The Ethics of War, Manchester: Manchester University Press. Evans, G (2008), Understanding Responsibility to Protect, Washington DC: Brookings Institute. Franck, T, M (1990), The Power of Legitimacy among Nations, New York: Oxford University Press. Friesendorf, C (2012), International Intervention and Use of Force: Military and Police, Geneva: Centre for democratic control of army forces. Grafstein, R (1981), The Failure of Weber’s Conception of Legitimacy: Its Causes and Implications, Journal of Politics Vol.43, No.2, Pp. 456-472. Hart, H (2012), Concept of Law, 3rd Ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Northedge, F.S (1974), The use of force in the International Relations, New York: the free press. Ronzitti, N (2002), The Current Status of the Principles Prohibiting the Use of Force and Legal Justifications of the Use of Force, Rome: Instituto Affari Internazionali. Schabert, T (1986), Power, Legitimacy and Truth: Reflections on the Impossibility to Legitimize Legitimations of Political Orders, in Moulakis, A (ed.) Legitimacy, New York: Walter de Gruyter Steffek, J (2003), The Legitimation of International Governance: A Discourse Approach, European Journal of International Relations, Vol.9, No.2, Pp.249-275. Walzer, M (2004), Arguing about War, New Haven: Yale University Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Storm of Steel Paper

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to answer this question it is first important to determine the fraises “pro-war” and “anti-war”. The term “pro-war” describes an attitude in which war is desired, necessary or justifiable. The term “anti-war” describes the opposite; war is viewed as immoral and is generally opposed and condemned. This paper will argue that there are grounds in the book to support both proposition.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bdq Essay

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In its last analysis the proposition is force to destroy force, conflict to prevent conflict, militarism to destroy militarism, war to prevent war. In its last analysis it must be that if it has any sanction behind its judgment at all. There is where the difficulty lies. . . .…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “World order” is the term given to the balance of power among the nation states of the world. Differences between these nations can lead to a power imbalance, which affects world order. It can best be achieved through agreements between states and other international instruments that set out the ideal international standards of behavior for states on a number of issues. But conflicts arise between countries due to differences in cultural attitudes and the desire for extra territory. In order to settle such disputes the international community has legal bodies such as the United Nations to cooperate with countries to find solutions and be a leader in settling and spreading ethical standards. Their prime aim is to promote world order. But for society not only the autonomy of nations and the lack of enforcement power but also a range of other factors limit the effectiveness of such an organisations.…

    • 2842 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of ‘Democratic Peace’ is probably ‘The closest thing that we have to a law in international politics.’ Authors such as Levy and Ray made this argument. This argument made by both authors supports the idea that ‘Democratic…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ETHNIC CONFLICT DBQ

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Over the course of the years world history has continued to change. New conflicts are constantly developing. In order to keep these conflicts under control special foundations and laws such as the United Nations and the Declaration of Human Rights have been founded. Despite the creation of the United Nations and the issuance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, conflict has continued in the post-World War II era. The attempts at keeping peace have and have not been effective since conflicts around the world keep reoccurring…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Force should be used when there are legitimate reasons for using it, and when it is the last resort for the government, who is responsible for civic peace. Elshtain uses Augustine to discuss justice and war. A paradox between war and peace is introduced, Elshtain uses an Augustine quote to discuss the similarity of two words that are complete polar opposites, “Peace and war had a contest in cruelty, and peace won the prize.” In history, there are many instances where evil and horrible things are done in the name of ‘peace’. Elshtain continues with the early Christian beliefs that under Jesus’ teaches forbid force in anyway, even under authority. Later, it transforms to the necessity of force to protect others. This leads to the four qualifications that Elshtain wrote to justify a war, the first is that the war must be publicly declared by a legitimate jurisdiction. The second criteria is that an unjust violence must have occurred against the government’s own people or a defenseless group. Third, the war has to be start with the proper motives. Finally, all other alternatives must be exhausted before leading to war. In the end, Elshtain includes a final criteria that must be met for a war to be ‘just’, the possibility of actually winning the conflict. If there is no chance of succeeding, the conflict should not be…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just War theory demands that for war to be justified a state must fulfil each of the following 6 requirements: (1) Just cause, (2) Legitimate Authority, (3) Right intention, (4) Likelihood of Success, (5) Proportionality and (6) Last resort. Just war theory was developed by theologians Augustine and Aquinas. This will be further discussed in the essay. In addition to this these 6 requirements can be categorised in 3 parts – Jus ad bellum, Jus in bello and Jus post bellum…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1990s raised the impetus of the international community to place the protection of civilians before state autonomy. However, given the complexity of international law and international relations, the threshold for triggering interventions continues to be debated.…

    • 3241 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    She suggests that different understandings of peace and order have affected states' willingness to intervene forcibly in other states, and aims to describe how changing beliefs and norms are the cause. Finnemore’s main thesis is that realist theory cannot make sense of how modern day interventions take place, because the…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages

    [3] DeCosse, David E. "Authority, lies, and war: democracy and the development of just war theory." Theological Studies 67.2 (2006): 378-394. ATLA Religion Database. EBSCO. Web. 4 Nov. 2009.…

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A large sector of just war theory references several moral and legal implications that must be evaluated prior to engaging in attack. The legalist paradigm, as expressed by theorist and author Michael Walzer in his book Just and Unjust Wars1, evaluates the conditions that constitute just war, and elaborates on several of the key circumstances that are required to impose just war on others. Despite its strengths, this paradigm is often evaluated as being a “strawman”, and provides only a foundation for which several other nuanced views can expand on. One fundamental idea expressed in his claims though, is the idea that “nothing but aggression can justify war”1. Through this, Walzer establishes the only moral precedent for which a counter-attack…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Elshtain, Jean B. “What Is A Just War.” Reading The World: Ideas That Matter. 2nd ed. ED Michael Austin. New York: Norton, 2009. 303.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, when states engage in intervention, it is rarely for humanitarian purposes. In many cases, national interest transcends international law in order to pursue economic profit from land or natural resources, oil in South Sudan’s case. R2P’s moral goals to bring peace, justice, democracy combined with weak institutional frameworks resulted in the United State’s and Britain’s’ justification of the invasion of Iraq. There are no authoritative bodies, but many unclear procedures and instructions, especially when determining what are atrocities and which constitute international intervention. The reluctance and indecision of states to interfere in Darfur in 2004 encompass the lack of autonomy of the doctrine. Despite saving lives, even…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays