Preview

Legitimation Structures of the Hamidian Era

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1521 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legitimation Structures of the Hamidian Era
Amid a period of decline in the power and extent of the Ottoman Empire, Abdülhamid II ascended the throne in 1876.[1] As sultan, he witnessed insurrection in the Balkans, the Russo-Ottoman War of 1978, the loss of massive amounts of territory, and the end of the Tanzimât period of reform. These points set the stage for a consolidation of imperial power and the utilization of the role of caliph as a legitimation tool in the Ottoman Empire in the late 19th century. Beginning in 1517, Ottoman sultans had claimed the position of caliph of all Muslims.[2] Abdülhamid II recognized the authority that came with that title and used to it fill a certain void in the Ottoman world. Specifically, a decline in real power in the Ottoman Empire in the face of ever-powerful European states required attention and necessitated the reinvention of the Ottoman power structure. Growing hostilities between European states and the Ottoman Empire and the exit of much of the empire's Christian population made Abdülhamid II's use of Islam as a legitimation structure possible. In the initial stages of Abdülhamid II's reign, he required the adoption of a constitution and the election of a parliament by a universal male electorate.[3] These requirements in their theoretical space could help to realize a liberal transition with Islamic arguments, which could balance the Tanzimât's imitation of western norms. The political structure of western norms did not work with the centuries-old Ottoman political culture, even if the pressure from the Western world was enormous to adapt western ways of political decision.[4] Abdülhamid II eventually suspended the constitution and closed parliament, effectively consolidating power within the throne.[5] Amidst these internal tensions, however, brewed international conflicts.
Beginning with the 1875 insurrection of Bosnia and Herzegovina and ending with the Congress of Berlin in 1881, the Ottoman Empire was faced with the prospect of disintegration and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    13. What groups were formed as a result of the Ottoman Empire’s reforms and what did each group advocate?…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Many people converted to Islam and there was a certain amount of political unity given by the Abbasid Dynasty but that was soon destroyed, causing North Africa to split into several divided states and contending states. Islam preached egalitarianism which made the people acknowledge conquerors and new rulers more easily. Additionally, Islam’s practice of combining the powers of the state and…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Why did the decline of the Ottoman Empire increase tensions among the European powers?…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ch19 answers

    • 4110 Words
    • 15 Pages

    17. In what ways did the Ottoman state under Sultan Selim III try to reform itself in its…

    • 4110 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap World Ch 20

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mehmed II – Ottoman sultan called the “Conqueror”; responsible for conquest of Constantinople in 1453; destroyed what remained of the Byzantine Empire…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CCOT Ottoman Religious

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By the beginning of this timeframe, the Ottoman Sultans have already been successful at re-establishing an Islamic Empire in the Middle East.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In attempting to compare theories of Government we need to look at the type of government in place in both England1 and The Ottoman Empire2,3 we need to define the period for comparison. It would be good to use descriptions of the rise of each form of government by following a timeline to form the basis of this essay. This unfortunately can't be the case, other than time there is no like-for-like comparison. The Ottoman’s imperial or dynastic monarchy, with a realm, extending over many countries needs to be looked at as an empire with responsibilities, which are by their very nature, complicated by the cultures they cross. England’s feudal monarchy and its constitutional executive government was very much focussed on internal affairs, ongoing wars and skirmishes with traditional foe, France, is somewhat the opposite of the Ottoman4.…

    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under Suleiman, popularly known as "the Magnificent" or "the Lawmaker” the Ottoman Empire reached its peak in its military and political power. Suleiman's armies conquered Hungary, over which the Ottomans maintained control for over 150 years, and they advanced as far west as Vienna, threatening the Habsburgs. To the east, the Ottoman forces took control of Iraq from the Safavids of Iran. In the Mediterranean, their navy captured all the main North African ports, and for a time the Ottoman fleet completely dominated the sea. For a time the Ottoman fleet completely dominated the sea. By the end of Suleiman's reign, the Ottoman Empire extended over a great portion of Europe, Asia, and Africa.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 632, the death of Muhammad would begin the time when Muslim armies would conquer lands throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Spain to establish Islamic ruled empires called caliphates that would last until 1258. The major Islamic ruled empires during this time that lasts about six centuries would be the Umayyad Caliphate (661-750) and the Abbasid Caliphate (750-1258), and these early Islamic empires would undergo many continuities and changes throughout their long existence. While Islamic culture and interaction with other empires and people endured for the Islamic Empires between the years 632 and 1258, the politics of the Islamic Empires during this time would instead adjust.…

    • 911 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ottoman Empire lasted for more than four centuries (1299-1922), and was not dismantled until the end of the World War I (Gelvin, 9). The Ottoman Empire governed a vast amount of territory from the Middle East, North Africa and even parts of Europe (Gelvin, 10). The Ottoman and Safavid Empires overlapped and had many similarities, but the Ottomans were more successful in maintaining a strong empire. The Safavids were successful until the interregnum period that brought Persia war, depopulation, famine and de-urbanization (Gelvin, 10). These factors brought the Safavid Empire to an end, even as…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the world’s most devastating and history-changing wars was caused by the assassination of Austria-Hungary’s Archduke Franz Ferdinand. He was next in line for the throne to govern over the Austria-Hungary empire in the beginning of the 20th century, and he was rising at a very dangerous and tense time. In the early 1900s, Austria-Hungary was in a stressful conflict with the country of Serbia. The Serbians wanted the land of Bosnia, in which the Austria-Hungarian empire had annexed into their country, and Serbia wanted to unite all of the Serb ethnic groups to form a country known as “Greater Serbia,” (Bodden 19). They wanted to send a message to Austria-Hungary, and they wanted to show that they meant business. So, the Serbian government…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The devastation of the Black Death following hard on the heels of the Mongol destruction of Islam’s most important city and capital of the Abbasid Empire, Baghdad, eliminated Islam’s old political order. Nonetheless, these two catastrophes prepared the way for new Islamic states to emerge. Of these, the Ottoman, the Safavid, and the Mughal dynasties ultimately grew powerful enough to become empires themselves. The most powerful, the Ottoman Empire, occupied the pivotal area between Europe and Asia. They embraced a Sunni view of Islam, while adopting traditional Byzantine ways of governance and trying new ways of integrating the diverse peoples of their expanding territories.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Selami says “the Ottoman Empire always gravitated towards progress and one of the reasons for the Ottoman Empire’s success was that it never considered going back to Central Asia thanks to the philosophy that came from the Huns and the Seljuks. The Ottoman Empire was a European state, especially in the eyes of Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror. The Empire gravitated not toward Asia but Europe.” Shown by their early and effective use of firearms. The Ottomans proved willing and able to borrow ideas. The early Ottoman enterprise was not a religious state in the making, it was primarily a pragmatic one. Because of this the Ottoman Empire was able to last longer than any of the empires surrounding them. The legacy of the Ottoman Empire can be seen today through institutional change, modernity and nationalism are all things that have contributed to what the Middle East is today. The Ottoman Empire is one of the largest and longest lived empires of the Middle East. The Ottoman Empire survived for more than four centuries until it was finally dismantled at the end of World War I in 1918. The Ottoman Empire provides us with a direct link from the early modern period through the modern…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ottoman Empire is the Turkish and Islamic state that ruled from 1299-1922. It is one of the most important and powerful Muslim Empires. The founder of the Ottoman Empire is Osman I. At first it was only a tribe and consisted of little followers but in a very short time it grew into being an Empire. Great architectural, military, and administrative accomplishments have taken place in the Ottoman Empire. The reason that this was such an powerful and long lasting Empire was because of the Sultan was not the only one ruling and not the only one making decisions. The Empire was not run by the personal choices and wants of the Sultan. The Ottoman Sultans were greatly affected by the institutions that surrounded them. Some of them being the wazirs, qadis, Shaykh al-Islam, janissaries and the women of the harem. The Sultan was of course at the top of the hierarchy but he made decisions n accordance with the approval of…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Zahir Shah, who gave precedence to the secular legal system over Shari’a law, overturned the Constitution of 1931 in 1964. The new Constitution viewed men and women equal, but there were only four women in the first parliament out of 216. In the late 1960s the changes was both support and opposed by the Afghan people. Many young people cam to Kabul to take advantage of expanded education, however others opposed the changes and fought for a return to Islamic values. the tension increase with the socialist and Islamist parties growing in strength. In 1873 his cousin and former minister Daoud suddenly overthrew Zahir Shah. Daoud tried to reduce the dependence on the Soviet Union and strengthen the link with the West and Iran. Daoud was not…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics