A Plan of Investigation
To What Extent Was Vladimir Lenin Responsible for the Downfall of the Tsarist Regime, and Subsequently the Provisional Government?
The aim of this investigation is to determine the reasons that Vladimir “Lenin”
Ulyanov was responsible for the downfall of the Tsarist Regime, and subsequently the provisional government in 1917. The investigation focuses on Lenin’s newspaper, The Pravda, Lenin’s eloquent speaking in St. Petersburg, and his leadership during the “November Revolution”[1] in 1917 in St. Petersburg (known as Petrograd at the time of the aforementioned revolution). Additionally, in the section entitled Evaluation of Sources, two of the sources used for this investigation, Lenin and the Russian Revolutions, and Lenin: The Man who made a Revolution, are evaluated with regards to their origins, purposes, values, and limitations.
B Summary of Evidence On October 25th, 1917 (Old Julian Style Calendar, equates to November 7th 1917 on the Gregorian Calendar), Vladimir “Antonov-Oseenko burst into a small room where the ministers [of the provisional government] were sitting,”[2] and “declared that in the name of the ‘Military Revolutionary Committee of the Petrograd Soviet’ he was placing them all under arrest.”[3] This decisive action officially ended the “November Revolution”[4] of the Communist uprising in Russia, in which Vladimir Lenin played a large, important role, and which would lead to the creation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R.).
In October of 1908, the first edition of Lenin’s newspaper, Pravda, was published.[5] This newspaper contributed to the spreading of Bolshevik idealisms, especially after “the offices of the newspaper were transferred to Moscow on March 3rd, 1918.”[6] Lenin “exercised broad editorial control over the paper”[7] which provided articles on contemporary society, economics, and cultural topics, “in addition to materials meant to indoctrinate and inform readers of Communist theories and programs.”[8] Throughout the 1900’s, as the influence of the Pravda grew in Russia, it “began to convince many of the validity of Communism,”[9] and as Lenin was its editor, (and a contributor to many of the philosophical articles[10]) he was directly responsible for its growth, which in turn increased the appeal of Communism to the masses (in Russia).
Ever since the start of his career in public speaking, Vladimir Lenin was always recognized as having a natural talent for it. An example of this was his speech at the Petrograd Soviet, just prior to the arrest of the council members of the provisional government, in which he assuaged the fears of the Soviet members, and reassured them that the future was indeed theirs for the taking.[11] In addition to his eloquent public speaking, Lenin’s writing was extremely persuasive as well, as is demonstrated in various letters and articles which he wrote during his life to help further the Bolshevik cause. Lenin’s writing has been described as “eloquent, and clearly written…convincing, even to one not well-versed in Communist literature.”[12] His persuasive writing was a large contribution to the Bolshevik party, as it helped convert many to their views. This in turn contributed to the downfall of the Tsarists (and later, the provisional government) by turning the populace against them.
During the November Revolution of 1917, Lenin provided the Bolsheviks with “an appealing vision of a socialist utopia,”[13] called The State and Revolution. In this “primitive, simplistic picture of the future,”[14] Lenin states that
We are being confronted by problems that cannot be solved by conferences or congresses, even Congresses of Soviets, but exclusively by the people, by the masses, by the struggle of the armed masses!...We must not wait! History will not forgive the revolutionaries for procrastinating when they can be victorious today![15] This extract from the aforementioned pamphlet demonstrates Lenin’s persuasive writing, as well as the leadership that he lent to the Bolshevik movement during this critical time in the Communist uprising. Also, the “problems” which he is referring to are the poor governing choices made by the provisional government (led by Alexander Kerensky).[16]
After extensive planning with Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin (as well as several other key members of the Bolshevik party), Lenin decided “that the precise moment to strike at the provisional government had come.”[17] As described by a Russian newspaper reporter named Sukhanov, “The stations, bridges, installations, and telegraphs were gradually occupied by small forces brought from the barracks…Not one casualty was recorded.”[18] After this, the provisional government was forced to hide in the former Tsar’s Winter Palace, and the Bolsheviks took control of the government. “Communism had finally taken over Petrograd.”[19]
C Evaluation of Sources Lenin: The Man Who Made A Revolution is an objective biography of Vladimir Lenin, and was written in 1969 by Israel Levine. Its purpose is to provide the reader with a detailed account of Vladimir Lenin’s life (from birth to death) as well as his revolutionary activities with the Bolsheviks. These revolutionary activities obviously include his part in the downfall of the Tsarist regime, as well as that of the provisional government, which makes this biography valuable to a reader who is searching for information in that area. In addition to this value, the novel is also written by a respected minister of public relations in the U.S. government, and as such, is a reputable source of information for any researcher. This document is limited however, in that it was published in 1969, which was before the release of many Soviet documents which relate to Lenin, and the Communist Revolution.[20]
The second document, Lenin and the Russian Revolutions, is a collection of primary documents compiled by F.W. Stacey, and published in 1972. The purpose of this document is to provide readers with a look at many interesting and informative primary documents written by a diverse range of people from Russia in the early 20th century. This group includes Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, and Kerensky. This document is valuable to a researcher due to it being a primary document, and containing many personal letters and documents written by key leaders and oppositional leaders of the Communist Revolution. Unfortunately, this document is limited because it is essentially a series of disjointed documents linked only by a brief introduction at the start of each of the 8 chapters. As such, the reader might not be able to properly grasp the context in which the documents were written.
D Analysis Vladimir Lenin is often portrayed as a hero of the Soviet Union, with his trademark goatee, and his slightly flattened nose.[21] This makes it imperative to remember that there must be objectivity in a biographical account, wherein The Man Who Made a Revolution is somewhat lacking in comparison to Lenin and the Russian Revolutions. Levine (The Man…) displays Vladimir Lenin as a hero, with little or no vices or faults, whereas Stacey (The Russian Revolutions) takes a completely objective view; simply stating the facts in her introduction paragraphs.
Lenin’s newspaper can be looked at in two ways, which are perfectly demonstrated by Levine’s and Stacey’s conflicting views, as a normal (albeit slightly biased) publication, or as propaganda (Levine’s and Stacey’s views respectively). While both viewpoints have valid reasoning, but it seems that the more prevalent of the two theories currently is the latter. It is well known that the Tsarists, and later the provisional government officials saw the Pravda as nothing but “Communist garbage, poisoning the minds of innocent civilians,”[22] which is appropriate, when one considers the fact that the newspaper played a major role in bringing about the end to both of their regimes.
Lenin’s moving speeches and persuasive writing are often given credit for a large portion of the bolstering of the Bolsheviks’ ranks with new converts during the late 1910’s.[23] This is supported by numerous sources, including firsthand accounts written by some of the people in his audience at the speech that he gave upon his arrival in Petrograd in 1917.[24] On This occasion, he says
Dear comrades, soldiers, sailors and workers! I greet you as the vanguard of the world proletarian army…Any day we shall see the collapse of European imperialism. The Russian revolution you have made has prepared the way and opened a new epoch. Long live the world socialist revolution!
In making this speech, Lenin “[turned] contemptuously away from the officials of the Petrograd Soviet’s pleas for support towards the provisional government”[25] and “had managed to hypnotize the crowd, so that they were willing to do his bidding.”[26] His bidding of course, consisted of dismantling the provisional government, which would indeed happen in the following months.
During the fateful November Revolution in Petrograd, Lenin worked with other leading members of the Bolshevik party to oust the provisional government from their position, laying plans which later culminated in the arrest of the government officials by Antonov-Oseenko on October 25th (November 7th on the Gregorian calendar). Lenin’s return “signaled a mass influx of exiles back to Russia,”[27] among them Trotsky, and Stalin. The plans also pivoted on Trotsky, the newly elected Chairman of the Petrograd Soviet,[28] and on his influence with other members of the Soviet. Essentially, Lenin was a behind-the-scenes director, staying hidden from the public eye for the most part, but when necessary, inspiring his comrades with speeches and readings from his literature.[29]
All three of these factors led to Lenin’s responsibility for the downfall of the Tsarist regime, and provisional government, and freely admitted it, saying, “We, the Bolshevik Party snatched Russia from the rich for the poor, from the exploiters for the toilers. We must now govern it.” This quotation shows that Lenin’s plan from the very beginning was never to support the provisional government, but to overthrow them.
E Conclusion Though there were other major ‘players’ in the Communist Revolution in Russia in 1917, Vladimir Lenin was undoubtedly the most recognized, and some would say, the most important. Through his newspaper, the Pravda, his eloquent speaking, and persuasive writing, and his infallible leadership during the November Revolution, he did indeed cause the downfall of both the Tsarist regime, and the provisional government. The Tsarists never tried to reason with the Bolsheviks, and even though the provisional government did, it did not grant them Lenin’s goodwill, and they fell just the same. This is “Lenin’s most recognized achievement, the one for which his name is known, and that is how he would want it to be.”[30]
-----------------------
[1] Israel E. Levine. Lenin: The Man who made a Revolution (New York: Messner, 1969,) 137.
[2] Ibid, 151.
[3] Ibid, 151.
[4] Ibid, 137.
[5] Spartacus Educational, “Pravda” .
[6] Ibid.
[7] Britannica Online, “Pravda (Soviet Newspaper)” < http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/474092/Pravda
[8] Levine, 122.
[9] Britannica Online, “Pravda.”
[10] Levine, 98.
[11] Levine, 150.
[12] F.W. Stacey. Lenin and the Russian Revolutions (Edward Arnold, 1972,) 22.
[13] Levine, 139.
[14] Levine, 140.
[15] Stacey, 31.
[16] Stacey, 32.
[17] Levine, 145.
[18] Stacey, 33.
[19] Stacey, 34.
[20] “Documents from the Soviet archives” < http://www.ibiblio.org/pjones/russian/>.
[21] Levine, 23.
[22] Levine, 123.
[23] World Bibliographies “Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov” < www.notablebiographies.com › Ki-Lo>
[24] Stacey, 28.
[25] Levine, 132.
[26] Ibid.
[27] Ibid, 133.
[28] Spartacus Educational, “Lenin” .
[29] Stacey, 40.
[30] Leon Trotsky. Lenin (New York, 1959) 138.
-----------------------
To What Extent Was Vladimir Lenin Responsible for the Downfall of the Tsarist Regime, and Subsequently the Provisional Government?
Table of Contents
Section Title Page
A Plan of Investigation 1
B Summary of Evidence 1
C Evaluation of Sources 4
D Analysis 5
E Conclusion 8
F Sources 9
Word Count: 1801 (excluding footnotes)
Michael Cushing
Mrs. Denomme
CHA 3UB
December 21, 2011.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…
- 2039 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
After the October Coup in 1917, the Bolshevik’s power as the government of Russia was not completely solidified. This was mainly due to the vast opposition that the Bolsheviks experienced from all over Russia along with other pressing issues such as food shortages, an exhausting war, and a crippled economy. Yet the Bolsheviks not only survived the early day‘s of empowerment but went on to rule Russia for the next 70 years. This essay will examine the factors that allowed the Bolsheviks to have such a sweeping success in ruling Russia.…
- 1312 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…
- 1843 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The environment I grew up in was a very bad neighborhood. The house we lived in, was in very horrible condition and accidents always happening around our surroundings. With my dad always out, struggling to work for us to always have food on the table and clothes on our bodies and my older brother always out doing things he wasn't supposed to do, we as a family never had time to talk about how our days went or what was on minds. A few years passed,my older sister Rosie, was 9 at the time, got into a car accident and sadly passed away. We as a family went through a tough time. My mother and father then decided that it was best for us to move into a more stable and friendly environment for my older brother, my soon to…
- 378 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Source A is supposed to be a valuable one because it’s adapted from Lenin’s April Theses for Peace, thus offering a perspective on the Revolution from the Bolshevik Party leader himself. However, the fact that it’s ‘adapted’ lowers its credibility, as the document might have suffered misleading changes, meant to portray Lenin and the Bolsheviks in a certain way. Moreover, the extract is published by the official communist newspaper which indicates a clear bias in favour of the Bolshevik Revolutionaries, making it a secondary source.…
- 981 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Niccolo Machiavelli had a grand vision of a man who would rule with cleverness and a steady hand when he wrote The Prince. Russia delivered a leader capable of taking power and controlling it in such a form as Machiavelli prescribed it. Vladimir Ilich Lenin was this man, he became the first leader of one of the most Machiavellian governments ever in existence, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.…
- 911 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Bibliography: Bernstein, Laurie, and Robert Weinberg. Revolutionary Russia: A History In Documents. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.…
- 2030 Words
- 9 Pages
Best Essays -
Vladimir Lenin’s own thirst for knowledge was a catalyst towards him becoming a professional revolutionary. According to one investigator of his youth,…
- 5832 Words
- 24 Pages
Good Essays -
During 1917 the political system of Russia, and the political opinions of its public, began to change. The First World War was deeply taking its toll, with the casualties running into millions, and food shortages were reaching crisis levels across Russia. Presided over by the Provisional Government, who had little support and even less real power, the people of Russia became restless. In October, the animosity between Government and populace came to a head, and a revolution put Lenin’s socialist Bolshevik party in power. This essay will show that, while the Bolshevik party was dedicated and driven in the values they believed in, it was only the seizing of opportunity, and a lot of luck, that they succeeded in taking power.…
- 1594 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Mark Twain creates a carnival of a tale driven by deception and deceit in his novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. His novel is full of buffoons and tricksters. One character named Huckleberry Finn fabricates stories to either achieve freedom or for financial gain. Initially, Huck is ignorant to the value of slave, Jim, as a person. He incessantly mocks the runaway as well as prank him. With every trick he plays, the young boy learns a lesson. Huckleberry evolves over the course of the novel. The tricks he plays are integral to the plot; however, they are more significant because of what they reveal: his maturation from a prejudice youth to a more respectful young man.…
- 1028 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When discussing why public opinion of the tsar was so easily pliable in the lead up to revolution in 1917, we must acknowledge that Russia was evolving rapidly. As modern historians and public spectators, it is simple to map out how Russian society became a pressure cooker of discontent and anger. Mass industrialisation made living for a working, urban class almost unbearable, the class divide was still rigid, revolutionary ideas from the West offered a foundation to base claims for the removal of the autocratic system, and the pressures of World War 1 served to unite the people in one cause to end hardship. These factors stoked a population already vying for change and such an environment made revolution in Petrograd (St Petersburg) in the February of 1917 almost inevitable, foreshadowing the end of the…
- 1502 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
On October 24, 1917, Bolshevik forces and their allies began seizing essential centers of power. By the next morning, the Bolsheviks informed the still- assembled congress of soviets that they had taken power in the name of the Russian worker and peasant and had established a temporary government. The events of October introduced a single Communist government in Russia for the first time. Non- Bolshevik newspapers were all shut down by the summer of 1918. All Russian industries were nationalized under the Bolshevik government. After making many promises to the peasants and delivering some, Lenin and the Bolsheviks came to the seat of power after the Civil War.…
- 592 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In March of 1917 in Russia, The Tsar, Nicholas II had little choice. The Great War (as it was known as at that time) had turned into a disaster, conditions at home were horrible, and the Menshevik government had forced Nicholas to abdicate He did this for himself and his son and gave the power to his brother. His brother gave up the power the next day because the country was in such disarray. After that, the Provisional Government took power. By November of 1917 in Russia, the Provisional Government was in complete collapse. In the meantime, the Bolshevik party, which was helped by German money, had built up an efficient party organisation, had a brilliant propaganda machine, and a powerful private army know as the Red Guards.…
- 592 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Russian Revolution was a key turning point in Russian history and in many ways is responsible for shaping the country into what it stands as now. At the helm of the revolutionary group, the Bolsheviks, was Vladimir Lenin and directly beneath him stood Leon Trotsky. It is important to make the distinction between the importance of rankings, and the amount of influence these two leaders had, when making the distinction between which of the two was more essential in the Russian Revolution. The main argument presented…
- 1557 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays