Preview

Liam And Mason In Boston During The 1700s

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
757 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liam And Mason In Boston During The 1700s
There once were two brothers named Liam and Mason in Boston during the 1700s. They were inseparable since birth and were both very compassionate. They always volunteered, or willingly stepped forward, to help anyone. They would even approach, or move toward, people and ask if they needed assistance with anything. However, a big issue came in their paths that changed their lives forever. Liam was a loyalist, or an American colonist who remained loyal to Britain and opposed the war for independence. While Mason was a patriot, or an American colonist who favored American independence. At first they didn't think it was a big deal since their brotherhood was more important than their opinions. However, with time they eventually realized they …show more content…
Mason’s friend from Virginia, Patrick Henry, who was also a member of the Virginia House of Burgesses, persuaded the burgesses to take action against the Stamp Act. The Virginia assembly passed a resolution, or a formal expression of opinion, saying it had “the only and sole exclusive right and power to lay taxes” on its citizens. Another friend of Mason, Samuel Adams in Boston helped start an organization called the Sons of Liberty against the Stamp Act. Mason joined this organization and helped burn effigies, or rag figures representing an unpopular individual. Mason also told merchants in the colonial cities to boycott, or refuse to buy, British and European goods. many of merchants signed nonimportation agreements, or pledges not to buy or use goods imported from …show more content…
Crispus Attucks, a dockworker who was part African and part Native American, was one of Liam and Mason’s closest friends since birth. The three of them always did good together and even the neighborhood would sometimes consider Attucks a brother to Liam and Mason. On March 5, 1770 a fight finally broke between Bostions and the British soldiers. There was a lot of yelling, fighting, and even deaths when this unfortunate encounter, or unexpected meeting, happened. Sadly, one of these deaths were the death of Crispus Attucks. This was later called the Boston Massacre. When the brothers heard the news of their friend’s death they got into an argument. Mason yelled at Liam for still supporting England after their friend, who was pretty much a brother to them, got assassinated by one of the soldiers. Liam yelled back that the colony isn’t ready for independence and that although he was saddened about how his best friend dying, he still is right. Mason got frustrated with his brother so much that he just went and did many reckless decisions with his friend Samuel

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    John Mason was an English who was appointed the commander of the colonial military at the time of the war. As the news reached him that Pequot tribe have issued threats to take out the new colonies on the Connecticut River, Mason and Underhill, another commander, led an army against them. They were supported by some Native American Indian tribes, namely the Uncas and the Miantonomo.…

    • 757 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Samuel Meeker storms into the Meeker tavern in a muddy uniform one rainy and wet day on April 1775. With a hungry stomach and a smile on his face he claims : "We've just beaten the British in Massachusetts!” which makes father extremely mad. You see, Father is loyal to the English government and King, or as Sam would say, Lobsterbacks. They get into an argument, which isn’t unusual between Sam and Father. Later, when the brothers are outside together Sam reveals to Tim his plan to steal their father's gun to fight-with the Patriots. Tim protests, says that stealing the gun would be a sin. Also, fighting with the patriots could get him killed, and it would be betraying Father and the King. But Sam won’t give in. The next morning, Sam is gone-and so is the gun.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Heron was truly part of the Patriot’s side but the Loyalists didn’t didn’t have a clue on that. He would give the Loyalists old information that wasn’t helpful, even Major Oliver de Lancey said that the information was useless. He pretended to give them information so that he could get information to tell the Patriots out of it. He would then go over to the Patriots…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The book begins from the point of view of the sentry who is guarding a building, but soon witnesses the Boston Massacre. Lawyer John Adams runs to the scene of the killing, but is told to go back home. He discusses the events with his wife, and the day after is asked to defend Captain Thomas Preston, who is accused of ordering the troops to fire. Thomas Gage, the commander in chief of British forces, meets with Massachusetts's governor Thomas Hutchinson and discusses removing the troops from Boston. Benjamin Franklin also discusses the events with Dr. Johnson. John Adams and Josiah Quincy successfully defend Captain Preston. Ben Franklin is voted to represent Massachusetts in Great Britain, but Lord Hillsborough refuses him to take the position. Franklin now becomes a symbol for the colonial cause. After the ship The Gaspee is burned, King George III orders that all colonial officials had to be appointed by the king. Massachusetts's citizens are outraged, and Adams calls…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crispus Attucks was an African-American man killed during the Boston Massacre and thus believed to be the first casualty of the American Revolution.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stamp Act was a tax imposed on the colonies by the British. Every public and legal document had to have the British seal on it. The fee paid for the seal was used to fund the military defenses of the colonies. Patrick spoke emphatically before the members of the House of Burgesses and claimed that only the General Assembly of Virginia had the right or the power to tax the people of the colony. He then wrote and later published seven resolutions in opposition to the Stamp Act. The Townshend Acts were indirect taxes imposed on 72 different consumer goods that were not produced in America. All of these goods had to be imported from Britain as they had a monopoly in the market. The money raised from the tax was to provide independent salaries for govenors and magistrates. This left the colonies unable to withhold their salaries in the event they did their jobs poorly. At the Continental Congress Patrick Henry backed boycotting British goods and raising a continental…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chains Book Report

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The relationship between the British Government and the American Colonies started to crumble. There were several reasons for this. Some people in the Colonies, like the Lockton's, hadn't yet decided which side they are on, Loyalists or Patriots, so they played on both. These people, the "half pats", would get information from America that would be useful in the time of war, and transmit this information to the British Government. This information proved to be crucial to help the Patriots win the Revolutionary War. The Patriots desperately wanted their independence, because there was an official religion and mostly, of the incredibly heavy taxes set in America. New York City was very different than it is today; no taxi's, no Time Square, and absolutely no skyscrapers, but there was tension in the air as if something on a large scale was about to occur. There were grand mansions on the street corners, people going to the shops in carriages, and mostly there were slaves. During the time of war, soldiers were rummaging through houses looking for anything made of lead, for ammunition. The Loyalists and the Patriots were both using spies to help them gain the advantage in the Revolutionary War. The British Government was using the Lockton's as well as…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adams helped formulate resistance against the unfair new taxes and created rebellious acts against them. Samuel Adams was successful in convincing people to join the Sons of Liberty. The Sons of Liberty were a group originally called the Loyal Nine who were opposed to British politics and wanted to have freedom from Britain. By writing articles and using his own politics, Adams was able to recruit skillful men to the group, including Josiah Quincy and Samuel Adams’s second cousin John Adams. When the Parliament passed the Stamp Act of 1765, Adams became angry that King George III would tax the colonies without giving them any representation in the government. He helped arrange the Stamp Act Congress held in New York where the colonies planned…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The patriots would probably despise that they came to the colonies. So, the patriot’s kind of called them names and things like that. Things really happened when the patriots started throwing rocks and ice at the loyalist windows but then again, they were only doing it because they were mad that they were there. The patriots thought that the loyalists were trying to make the government to follow them and pay taxes to the British, and who wouldn’t think that at that time. Then the soldiers came out and one of the patriots pushed one of the…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benjamin Franklin living in London in order to make compromise from Americans side. This seemed surprising because he was a traitor and it would cause a big trouble for Franklin in future. In 1768, when England had collision course with America, 1000 British troops were sent to create antagonism to which colonists did not react well (“Boston, Bloody Boston: The Revolution”). During this event, British troops had not acted violent first, in fact, surprisingly, it was colonists who had started the fight and had forced Britishers to use weapon against them which caused 5 civilians to die. This was known as the start of Boston Massacre which was viewed as British slaughtering civilians, by Patriots (“Boston, Bloody Boston: The Revolution”). This event was also surprising because I had learned that Britishers had attacked first and learning that civilians with firm conviction were able to attack first seemed astonishing. After England sent 3000 troops, it was expected of the British troops to attack first, yet the outcome was notably distinct as 73 Britishers had died, 174 wounded, and 26 missing while 49 Americans had died, 40 wounded, and 5 missing (“Boston, Bloody Boston: The Revolution”). This was notably different because British troops were very strong, armed, and trained, however Americans were equally strong as they defeated so many of British…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sons Of Liberty Dbq

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Sons of Liberty were groups of colonists that gathered together to protest taxes that were imposed on them by the British government. Secret groups of men got together to protest the taxation and fees that they felt were unfairly imposed on them. One of the events that precipitated this was the Stamp Act passed by the British parliament in 1765. This caused a firestorm of opposition from the colonists, including legislative resolutions in Virginia and public demonstrations in Massachusetts that included threats and bodily harm . The name Sons of Liberty came from a speech given to the British parliament by Colonel Isaac Barre where he referred to the colonials as sons of liberty . The motto of the group was “no taxation…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This event actually helped the colonists have more of a reason to fight against England. It helped them because it made them stronger and more angeryer at the British. The colonists were done with the british and they did not care what happened to them, they wanted revenge for killing their family members. The outcome for the British was that they learned that the colonists are very powerful with weapons or no weapons. They also learned that these kinds of incidents have the right to be punished. The British soldiers were punished for doing this to the…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this building Patrick Henry delivered his "Caesar-Brutus" speech against the Stamp Act on May 29, 1765. Henry, George Washington, George Mason, George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Jefferson, and others played their parts in the legislative wars that ended in revolution.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Wealth of Nations

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When a nation binds itself by treaty wither to permit the entry of certain goods from one foreign country which it prohibits from all others, or to exempt the goods of one country from duties to which it subjects those of all others, the country, or at least the merchants and manufacturers of the country, whose commerce is so favoured, must necessarily derive great advantage from the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business owners in an attempt to protect the goodwill of their business will often include “Restraint of trade” provision in employment agreements, sale of business agreements etc. Thus, an agreement, which someone is restricted in his freedom to carry on his trade, profession, business or other economic activity, is generally called an agreement in restraint of trade.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays