‘The Barn’ by Seamus Heaney and ‘Like Dolmens Round my Childhood’ by John Montague are two poems that explore the theme of fear in childhood. The fears of each poet are very different in that Heaney’s fear of the barn is triggered by his vivid imagination whereas Montague’s fear of becoming like ‘the old people’ is a much more complex and emotional issue that relates to real life experiences. The theme of fear is apparent right from the start of ‘The Barn’ and Heaney progresses this fear throughout the poem. It is only at the end of ‘Like Dolmens Round my Childhood’ that the reader becomes aware that Montague’s fear was ending up like the elderly people he knew as a child.
Both poems have very different structures. ‘The Barn’ consists of five stanzas with four lines per stanza, whereas ‘Like Dolmens round my childhood’ is made up of seven stanzas with seven lines per stanza. Heaney uses each stanza to progress his story whereas Montague takes each stanza and tells a completely different story with each one. Each then gives the reader a different sensation whenever they read the poem. Heaney writes his poem from a child’s perspective but Montague writes his poem where he looks back on certain experiences from his childhood and reflects on the effect that they had on him. This then again gives the reader different views on how the fear of these children was very much the same but Montague realises that these people he writes about were out casted from the community. Heaney brings to the attention of the reader that the fear that exists in rural childhood is almost magnetic and it kept drawing him in even though it scared him.
Both poets use language and imagery for effect. Montague uses detailed descriptions in order to present a clear image of each elderly person and Heaney uses detailed descriptions to present a clear image of the surroundings. Heaney often uses language to appeal to the scenes ‘musky dark’ ‘smooth chill’ whereas Montague does not apply this technique. Montague tends to use more sinister overtones such as ‘serpent flickered’. The old people in ‘Like Dolmens’ are victims of social isolation and Montague feels guilt for these people. Heaney as a child, alters the view of reality by using military motif and changing farming machinery into weapons and ‘armoury’. This farming machinery creates a dangerous and a hostile environment, whereas Montague uses the parochial community as his hostile environment. On reflection, both of the poems have a negative environment.
Heaney uses emotive language to convey the terror of the boy ‘you felt cobwebs clogging up your lungs’ and likewise Montague also uses language to reveal his disturbance at certain people ‘dead eyes, serpent-flicked’. Both poets also use alliteration and we see this when Heaney uses the phrase ‘cobwebs clogging’ in order to create a feeling of claustrophobia and to heighten the sense of panic. We also see Montague use alliteration when he uses the phrase ‘penny every pension’, to show the kindness of Jamie McCrystal. He also says that Mary Moore’s house was ‘crumbling’, and this refers to her life and how it essentially crumbled around her. Both poets make use of similes and metaphors. Montague uses the metaphor ‘well of gossip’ in order to show society’s negative view of Maggie Owens. Similarly, Heaney uses the metaphor ‘I was chaff’ to convey how small and insignificant the boy feels at the end of the poem. Heaney refers to childhood fairy tales in ‘The Barn’ in order to show the boys fear ‘when the zinc burned like an oven’. Heaney compares entering the barn to entering an oven which is a reference to the fairy tale ‘Hansel and Gretel’. Montague does not refer to a childhood fairy tale, but he does make reference to old Irish superstition when he states ‘The rune and the chant, evil eye and averted head’.
Heaney’s boyhood ambivalence about the barn is a mix of fear and fascination. Montague has a mix of emotions throughout the poem such as fear, guilt and anger. In ‘The Barn’ Heaney’s fear escalate until the boy is left feeling paralysed by the rush of adrenaline and the child’s imagination amplifying and twisting reality. In ‘Like Dolmens’, Montagues fear dissipates and by the end the fear has changed to anger and how these elderly people were treated and how they were subject to social isolation. Heaney has a very narrow scope in his poem and primarily focuses on being inside the barn and the mix of emotions that he felt and went through, but Montague has a much broader scope and in his poem we see and wider mix of emotions. Montague heavily criticises the rural Irish life and this is not usually seen by Irish poets. Montague voices his own opinion on rural Ireland and uses this poem to do so. Also by writing this poem about the old people, has given them immorality and these people will now never be forgotten. The vulnerability that is experienced by the boy in ‘The Barn’ is only imaginary but the vulnerability that these old people experienced in ‘Like Dolmens’ is real.
The tone in ‘The Barn’ begins as a combination of curiosity, excitement and fear; the boy refers to the equipment as ‘an armoury’ and describes the barn as if it were a pirates cove filled with treasure ‘grit of ivory’. However, as the poem progresses, the tone changes from fear to utter terror ‘I lay face-down to shun the fear above’. The tone in ‘Like Dolmens Round my Childhood’ remains solemn and sad until the last stanza. The tone is reflective in the last stanza as Montague is summing up the impact the people he previously described had on him. However, Montague also reveals that he has conquered his fear from childhood, ‘I felt their shadows pass’. ‘The Barn’ ends on a peak of terror with the boy having a nightmare ‘the two lugged-sacks moved in like great blind rats’. Montague is over his fear whereas the boy is not.
In conclusion, though both poets explore different aspects of fear in childhood, they both express these fears using similar literary techniques. However, Montague not only explores childhood fears in ‘Like Dolmens Round my Childhood’ but he also refers to issues in society and his disgrace at modern society ‘Ancient Ireland, indeed! I was reared by her bedside’.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In both poems people reflect on relationships that have gone wrong. Write about both poems and their effect on you. Show how they are similar and how they are different.…
- 993 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The evidence of the key theme of loss of innocence can be clearly seen throughout Glen Harwoods poem “Barn Owl”. A key example of the loss of innocence in “Barn Owl” is where the child who is at first described as an “innocent child” then as the poem progresses and the child loses their innocence by killing the barn owl the child is then referred to as a “horny fiend” and lastly the child is mentioned as “afraid”.…
- 285 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Gwen Harwood, An Australian poet who, seems to develop an imaginative, rich form of poetry through the use of recurring themes, complex language techniques and even further through the use of sophisticated structures only seen in the most prestigious of poems in the modern era. Gwen Harwood has a tendency to write poetry that is significant in all eras, cultures and/or societies of the world as she captures, and develops them into a strong universal theme that recurs strongly. These themes seem to endure, and portray the human experience by relating these in forms that resonate through a range of various environments; these poems have an immense structural integrity. These themes are depicted powerfully in poems such as; Father and Child, Violets the 2 poems that I have chosen to discuss in this speech. In the Father and child, it has a unique structure of 2 parts; the 1st (Barn Owl) discusses her loss of innocence in the daughter’s perspective in the past, the second part (Nightfall) Being the downfall to her father, how he is put in an degenerative state, slowly falling to his demise. This is to do with Gwen accepting the inevitability of her father’s death. These 2 poems can be read symbiotically in a dual nature to provide further insight into both their poems, or separately as a poem. The language in the first poem is quite unique. It highlights the use of very simple words, with little complexity, this can be interpreted to show the innocence that the child still possesses, as children (better yet an innocent child) are meant to speak with less complexity than a full grown adult. These sentences also tend to be monosyllabic. ‘I knew my prize, who swooped home at this hour’ are all monosyllabic. As the poem continues, especially after the owl is shot, the child’s vocabulary seems to improve in complexity, losing its monosyllabic nature. This can symbolize the loss of innocence that the child had experienced by killing the owl senselessly. Gwen also uses many…
- 974 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
A difference between the two poems is the use of punctuation. In Quickdraw a lot of punctuation is used and the commas almost represent the metaphorical bullets being used in the argument between the couple and also to represent the gradual fragmentation of their…
- 476 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Harwood utilises poetic power to construct the foundation for her poem, ‘Father and Child’. It is a reflective poem, focusing predominantly on the cyclical nature of life and the empowering and immortalising powers of memory, whilst also referencing the universal truth of the inevitability of death. It is a powerful diptych poem consisting of two parts, ‘Barn Owl’ and ‘Nightfall’. In ‘Barn Owl’, a young child embarks on her journey from the time of innocent childhood to the sophisticated and innate world of adulthood, naively attempting to shoot an owl. Whereas in ‘Nightfall’, the child is introduced as an adult, walking with her seemingly elderly father, directing him onto the sorrowful path of the end of his life, whilst reflecting on the…
- 538 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The second part of the poem ‘Nightfall’ continues the story of the child forty years from ‘Barn owl’, where she had lost her innocence by shooting an owl and this had resulted in a heavy hearted guilt which was caused by her unknowing and stubborn actions. The poem represents death closing in on the father, and the limitations of time on their relationship that was never experienced before in her younger years. The father, who in the first poem is depicted as an “old no-sayer”, is now held in high esteem, he is admired and respected as an “old king”. The extended metaphor “Since there is no more to taste ripeness is plainly all. Father we pick our last fruits of the temporal.” Appeals to our senses and is now an aural metaphor, it illustrates the father’s life becoming fulfilled or ripe, it has come near to its end and the father and child will now spend or pick the last moments of the father’s life together. Over time her appreciation of her father has changed, this is shown through “Who can be what you were?” and “Old King, your marvellous journey’s done.” She has realised the valuable life her father has led and the great loss that will be felt after he is gone. The child, now a grown woman learns another lesson about death, it can be quiet and peaceful, and “Your night and day…
- 1245 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The poem “Father and Child” by Gwen Harwood shows Harwood’s father teaching her the concepts of life and death, from when she is a young child in “Barn Owl” up to when she is around forty at the time of his death in “Nightfall”, coming to accept the idea that life is not never-ending. In part one called “Barn Owl”; she has learnt to accept death as a component of life. The persona of the poem experiences a loss of innocence with the discovery of the tragedy of death. Before shooting the owl, the child believes they are the “master of life and death,” with the noun, “master,” reflecting the power that the child feels and the ignorance that the child has about the nature of death. This description of the child is later contrasted in the fourth stanza, “I watched, afraid by the fallen gun, a lonely child who believed death clean and final, not this obscene bundle of stuff.” The emotive term, “afraid,” represents the change in the persona’s attitude after being exposed to the harsh reality that is mortality. However, the rhyme and last line “what sorrows in the end, no words, no tears can mend” releases an element of inexpressible sadness that she has towards the death of her father showing that although she accepts death, it still upsets her as it did in “Barn Owl”. Father and Child” Nightfall” is more metaphorical and symbolic suggesting a more mature persona like an adult. The poem represents a human’s journey over time of learning to mature and accept death.…
- 610 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
As governor, Miller campaigned to establish a state lottery. He succeeded in getting laws passed that restricted lottery proceeds to fund pre-kindergarten programs, capital and technology enhancements for Georgia schools, and most innovative of all, the HOPE Scholarship program. HOPE scholarships provide full tuition at any state college or university to any Georgia resident who graduates from high school with at least a B average. In 1992 voters passed the lottery, and the programs that the lottery funds were launched in 1993. Miller also signed legislation that gave Georgia the toughest repeat offender sentencing guidelines in the nation.…
- 517 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Both poems are about the death of a child. However, the poets have chosen to actually state the death at different places of the poem. Jonson reveals and hints the death in the first three words of the first line, ‘Farewell, thou child…’ However Heaney doesn’t actually clearly state that his brother has died, but instead spreads it out across the whole poem especially in the second half, ‘the corpse…’, ‘I saw him… Paler now’ and ‘the bumper knocked him clear.’ The effect of this is so that it takes the audience a while before they can establish what has happened. Heaney may have…
- 1236 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Both “A Barred Owl” and “The History Teacher” present the idea of conveying information to children but focus on different results. In “A Barred Owl”, a child’s parents use a personified explanation to make the outside world less scary. In “The History Teacher”, the teacher ironically tries to protect his students’ innocence by playing down history. Each poem is an example of how humans are affected by words.…
- 520 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The thing that makes both of the poems alike is that they both serve the same purpose in explaining the lives of two different people but the common chain between the both of them is that one is young and the other is old. The both of them play off of each other in the sense that the poem about the younger generation who are rushing through their lives skipping school, staying out late shooting pool and dying before their time. While in the old one, the men are enjoying their lives and living it to the fullest knowing they are not going to live forever.…
- 556 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Also, both poems are narrated by a single person, implying that the choices that they have made and the hardships they have endured have been alone. This implies a strength and individuality from either narrator.…
- 1092 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The second sections of the two poems draw attention to the differences in each situation. The two poets use symbolism of something dark; Keats using the…
- 692 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Write about both poems and their effect on you. Show how they are similar and how they are different.…
- 458 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
|Write about both poems and their effect on you. Show how they are similar and how they are different. |…
- 1457 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays