Preview

Literary comparison between Henry Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience" and Martin Luther King's "Letters from Birmingham Jail."

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
969 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Literary comparison between Henry Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience" and Martin Luther King's "Letters from Birmingham Jail."
Martin King and Henry Thoreau both write persuasive expositions that oppose majority ideals and justify their own causes. While this similarity is clear, the two essays, "Letters from Birmingham Jail" by King and "Civil Disobedience" by Thoreau, do have their fair share of differences. Primarily in the causes themselves, as King persuades white, southern clergy men that segregation is an evil, unjust law that should be defeated through the agitation of direct protesting, and Thoreau, writing to a more broad, non addressed audience, and focusing more on the government itself, contends that at its present state, with the war with Mexico and the institution of slavery, that one should do as he does and refuse to pay government taxes that support such evil practices or "traditions." While both Thoreau and King prevail in establishing a firm impression for what they strongly believe in, they each succeed in their persuasive efforts through different means. Chiefly, in the way that King draws emotional appeal with the usage of a burning passion and devotion, and Thoreau, while still making it evident that he is devoted in what he believes in, draws more emotional appeal through being more distressed and concerned than naively hopeful and optimistic. However, similarities remain to be as numerous as differences as both Thoreau and King bring credibility or ethical appeal to their assays essentially with allusions to Christ and the Bible.

First, King's emotional appeal is what above all contrasts his essay with Thoreau's. As virtually everything else; the theme of disobeying "unjust laws", their admiration for the "minority's viewpoint, and even, coincidently, where they wrote their essays - prison, is all the same. King makes two references to conversations shared with his children. Once with his little girl who wants to go to the public amusement park and is quickly developing "tears in her eyes" as her father has to sadly explain the reality that black children aren't

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Both passages “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and “Resistance to Civil government” have the same general purpose which was the idea of Civil disobedience, not agreeing with the law because it violates one’s morality or inner conscience belief. In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Martin Luther King explains his reasoning for why he retaliated the law and the idea of protesting without violence. Henry David Theoreau recognizes the unjust ways of the government and the issues of slavery. The tone that Theoreau uses seems to be more aggravated and anger driven than that of King, who expresses the issues using a less harsh tone and not as many witty comments. In King’s passage, his tone is more deep and personal, speaking on a level representing the African American community and the hardships that they go through. In Theoreau’s passage, he uses a less personal approach and uses more factual based things and the use of grim irony explaining that what is being done is the opposite of what America was founded on, he goes on to say “Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward” This is similar to King’s quote “The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "an unjust law is no law at all.”. King also explains his reasoning for his actions, for the revolutions and rebellion for the sake of the rights that all men are created equal and should be treated that way in America, because that is what is stated in the constitution and what the Christian faith…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable. But almost all say that such is not the case now. But such was the case, they think, in the Revolution of '75. If one were to tell me that this was a bad government because it taxed certain foreign commodities brought to its ports, it is most probable that I should not make an ado about it, for I can do without them. All machines have their friction; and possibly this does enough good to counter-balance the evil. At any rate, it is a great evil to make a stir about it. But when the friction comes to have its machine, and oppression and robbery are organized, I say, let us not have such a machine any longer. In other words, when a sixth of the population of a nation which has undertaken to be the refuge of liberty are slaves, and a whole country is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army, and subjected to military law, I think that it is not too soon for honest men to rebel and revolutionize. What makes this duty the more urgent is that fact that the country so overrun is not our own, but ours is the invading army. (Henry David Thoreau)…

    • 2666 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two different writers, Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, argue that society is not at its finest and that every man has the responsibility to impact change and every many has the power to do so, only if man is an extremist for the greater good. King was a reverend but more importantly he was a dominant voice for thousands of persecuted people during the civil rights movement. From King expressing his knowledge and acting on them, he was obliged and jailed (he was obliged to jail?) within King's cell he composed a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. (transition?) Thoreau was a philosopher who contained all the qualities of a transcendentalist. Much time before King’s letter, Thoreau fabricated a response to when…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Apology and Civil Disobedience are two famous literatures that depict the principles or basic premises of Socrates and Henry David Thoreau, respectively. The Apology, however was written by Plato based on his depiction of Socrates’ defense speech when he was put on trial for “corrupting the youth and impiety.” Principles found in Socrates’ speech to the men of Athens (jurors) can be compared and contrasted to principles of Henry David Thoreau which can be located in his essay, Civil Disobedience.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King starts his essay with addressing that he never usually answers statements that criticize his work. He goes on to state what role he plays in the south and why he is in Birmingham. He is there because Birmingham is the most segregated city in America and injustice is most prevalent there. He writes that nations such as Asia and Africa are moving forward with gaining political independence, but America was still moving with incredibly slow speed trying to obtain the same goal. There are examples of the horrors that colored people have gone through; parents getting lynched, people getting abused by officers, not being shown respect, and having to explain to their children why the cannot be in the same area as white people. He goes on to talk…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Letter from a birmingham jail and Thoreau's essay are alike in similar ways because they both attempt to argue for rights . In the letter from birmingham jail the thing martin luther kind try to do was demonstrate that he was against segregation and racial terror. " Bombingham" was what they started to call this place because afrian americans were starting to stand up for there rights, Marin luther king got arrested while he was participating in a peaceful anti-segregation march. He was doing this march because of segregation, there was segregation in schools, bathrooms and restaurants. People would even say that why was king getting involved in the bermingham problems if he didnt even live there but king had three reasons to why he was there…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Thoreau and King rely heavily on ethos to get their points across. The intended audience of both is similar; a group of people with similar morals as the writers, but who have neglected action for various reasons. King also appeals to pathos, describing the plight of the colored man vividly. King’s audience is largely aware of this situation already, but he uses it to drive them to action rather than simple awareness. On the other hand, Thoreau appeals little to pathos, focusing instead on logic and ethics.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone vs Mlk

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two works of literature written in two different time periods with so many similarities, ‘Antigone’ by Sophocles and ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’ by Dr. Martin Luther King is baffling to say the least. These stories both transcend time and really bring to life the emotions of that particular time. They were persecuted for their beliefs. “Antigone” by Sophocles and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. both shows civil disobedience as a way to take a stand for what the protagonist believes in; the latter is less of a story but more of a rebuttal in writing to those who disagreed with Dr. King’s methods of gaining equality and desegregation of the south.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is using nonviolent protest to boycott government in an attempt to influence the legislation to change the policy. Henry David Thoreau created a writing called "Civil Disobedience", talking about its meaning and how he had experienced civil disobedience. He had been sent to jail for not paying a poll-tax for six years (Thoreau par. 7). When he was released, he paid the tax; obeying the law, but had still thought that government is biased for making him pay it (McElroy par. 2). Wendy McElroy stated "He listened to the inner voice of his conscience, a voice all men possess but few men follow (McElroy par. 5). Thoreau listened to his belief and did not pay the tax because he did not believe it was something that he should have to do. Overall, Thoreau was a simple man who relied on nonviolent nature and his own beliefs to disobey the government and its laws. Thoreau would have recognized the Singing Revolution in Europe and the Kent State University protestors as significant acts of civil disobedience considering…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The laws and regulations that have been set on our country are primarily what the government see as appealing to the American public. Much like in the Mexican American War which Thoreau referes to show that the majority is capable of taking over authority. In the essay he also referes to slavery to prove the same point. In Civil Disobedience Henry David Thoreau's argument that the American people should question the government and it's authority is logical because it shows that the public has more of a say and that the actions of the men fighting show more American customs than the actual government.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the search of justice and change, both Thoreau and King used their powerful words to create a spark to light the movement for a better nation. Thoreau sought to make men think for themselves and not blindly follow a government’s rule just because they deem it correct. King addressed the government as well, but to help gain his own freedom and that of millions of blacks around the country that still, years after Thoreau’s time, had not been freed physically or emotionally from the chains of the white man.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A wind blows…wind fans the spark…the spark ignites the grass…burning grasses cause sticks to burn and the increasing flames ignite the forest. Thoreau’s revolutionary ideas about Civil Disobedience had a similar effect throughout the following decades on the thoughts and minds of the oppressed.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most loved and famous civil rights activist in America was Martin Luther King, Jr. Even though Thoreau and Kings Movements slightly differed from each other one can only assume that King must have studied Thoreau in one point of his life. You can tell that Martin Luther King Jr didn’t just follow the content from Thoreau but in the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” King followed the style that Thoreau wrote in “Civil Disobedience”. The same way that Thoreau asked questions to his audience king asked questions to his by writing “Why direct action? Why sit –INS, marches and so forth? Isn’t negotiations a better path?” (Martin Luther King 226). Martin Luther King also follows Thoreau style when he writes “A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God” (Martin Luther King 228). Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau was similar not just because they stood up for what they belief in but their writing styles were the same. They both expressed their ideas by giving a detailed description of their current situation they was in. In their essay/ letter they both quoted other civil activist in their work. Like Martin Luther King Jr another man adopted Henry David Thoreau format in “Civil Disobedience” That man was named Ghandi. Ghandi…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The one night he only spent in jail, he was released by a wealthy friend who could not bear to see him in that place. Thoreau states “unjustly, the true place for a man is also prison”, but his actions contradict this. (7). Thoreau’s philosophical take on civil disobedience would have changed had he had to spend a year or a decade in prison, or in a prison that was full of hardened criminals. Looking at Thoreau’s experience and holding it up with his writings on the philosophy of civil disobedience is hypocrisy. This hypocrisy that is shown by not experiencing the response in any meaningful way. Civil Disobedience is a work that everyone should read, that has much to offer despite the inconsistency of its author’s…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By using Ethos, Logos, and Pathos King and Thoreau write their essays to persuade their audience with their common idea of the necessity of civil disobedience when the government and the society present unjust actions. In "Civil Disobedience", Thoreau relies more on Ethos and Logos with combination with his rhetoric strategy to sway his audience into agreeing with his point of view. That could be shown when Thoreau says, "He who gives himself entirely to his fellow men appears to them useless and selfish; but he who gives himself partially to them is pronounced a benefactor and philanthropist." Likewise, Dr. King also uses rhetoric techniques to convince his audience with his outlook, but he relies more on Pathos to capture the sentimental aspect of his audience. King's use of Pathos is clear when he says, "…when you have seen hate-filled policemen curse, kick, brutalize, and even kill your black brothers and sisters with impunity…" By mastering diction, he is able to make one cry just by choosing the right words to make the reader/audience feel involved in the subject discussed.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays