With responses from a sample of 166 business executives from a broad mix of companies of various sizes and industries, this 2004 baseline study on corporate social responsibility in the Philippines is the first and the most comprehensive research investigation of the CSR practice in the country in terms of scope and approach to societal impact management (SIM).
Regardless of the size of their company, business executives in the Philippines see corporate citizenship as a fundamental part of business. Most company managers say they view corporate citizenship as central to good business practice. 82 per cent of executives surveyed say that good corporate citizenship helps the bottom line. 59 per cent say these practices improve the image and reputation of the company, while 53 per cent say corporate citizenship is important to their customers.
The findings in this report provide a baseline portrait of executives’ perceptions of the state of corporate citizenship in the Philippines in 2004 and a solid basis to track its evolution over time. The author’s intent is to revisit the topic biennially, with scheduled follow-up planned for 2006.
Statement of the problem
The study on the current status of corporate citizenship in the Philippines seeks to establish a baseline of the CSR motivations, extent of implementation, obstacles and expectations among the micro, small, medium and large enterprises in the country.
Specifically, the study will seek answers to the following questions:
(1) What is the emerging view of CSR among business organisations with regard to:
1. good corporate citizenship
2. business case for CSR
3. public expectations
4. issues where they believe businesses should play an active role?
(2) To what extent do the following factors drive the respondents’ CSR efforts:
1. community expectations
2. company traditions and values
3. business strategy Australian Association for
References: Brinkman, J (2003) Does corporate social responsibility lead to improved financial performance? An analysis of the electric utility industry Carroll, AB (1979) ‘A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance’, Academy of Management Review, ProQuest database, accessed 8 July 2004 Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College (2003) The state of corporate citizenship in the United States: 2003, http://www.bc.edu/centers/ccc/, accessed 28 April 2004.Clarkson, MBE (1995) ‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance’, Academy of Management Review, ProQuest database, accessed 17 May 2004. Dunlap, WP (2000) ‘Canonical correlation and chi-square: relationships and interpretation’, Journal of General Psychology, ProQuest database, accessed 17 May 2004. Francois, R and Amstrong, A (2003) ‘Ethics as a risk management strategy: the Australian experience’, Journal of Business Ethics, ProQuest database, accessed 13 June 2004. Freeman, RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Pitman Publishing Company. Friedman, M (1970) ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’, New York Times Magazine, 13 September, p 32ff. Ganchero, EG (2004) ‘Benchmarking corporate citizenship practice in the Philippines’, DLS Journal of Business and Management, vol 1, no 1, pp 33–43. Harrison, JS and Freeman, RE (1999) ‘Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Horvath, DJ (2004) ‘Competitive strategies of the future: can corporate social responsibility and the bottom-line work together?’ Unpublished paper presented at DSL-PSI Graduate School of Business RCBC Campus, Makati City, 25 October. Interactions (2005) Research Symposium on the State of Corporate Citizenship in the Philippines, 22 January (unpublished). Itkonen, Laura (2003) ‘Corporate social responsibility and financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal, Proquest database, accessed 28 April 2004. Maximiano, JM (2003) Corporate social responsibility: basic principles and best practices: historico-philosophical issues in international business, PLDT/ACM, Manila. Orlitzky, M (2001) ‘Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social Orlitzsky, M, Schmidt, FL and Rynes, SL (2003) ‘Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis’, Organization Studies, ProQuest database, accessed 8 July 2004 Oxford Research (2003) Survey and analysis of tools in connection with CSR and sustainability, Danish Confederation of Trade Unions, Copenhagen, http://www.lo.dk, accessed 8 December 2003. Pasamonte, JN (2005) ‘A critique on methodology’, Research Symposium on the State of Corporate Citizenship in thePhilippines, 22 January. Phillips, R (2003) Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics, Berrett-Koehler Publisher, San 18 Raynard, P and Forstater, M (2002) Corporate social responsibility: implications for small and Enterprises Branch. Simon, H (1997) Administrative behavior, The Free Press, New York Taskforce on the Churches and Corporate Responsibility (2000) Bench marks for measuring business performance: corporate social and environmental responsibility − Waddock, SA and Graves, SB (1997) ’The corporate social performance–financial performance link’, Strategic Management Journal, ProQuest database, accessed 28 April 2004 Wood, DJ (1991) ‘Corporate social performance revisited’, Academy of Management Review, ProQuest database, accessed 28 April 2004.