Preview

Local Studies

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6171 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Local Studies
Abstract
With responses from a sample of 166 business executives from a broad mix of companies of various sizes and industries, this 2004 baseline study on corporate social responsibility in the Philippines is the first and the most comprehensive research investigation of the CSR practice in the country in terms of scope and approach to societal impact management (SIM).
Regardless of the size of their company, business executives in the Philippines see corporate citizenship as a fundamental part of business. Most company managers say they view corporate citizenship as central to good business practice. 82 per cent of executives surveyed say that good corporate citizenship helps the bottom line. 59 per cent say these practices improve the image and reputation of the company, while 53 per cent say corporate citizenship is important to their customers.
The findings in this report provide a baseline portrait of executives’ perceptions of the state of corporate citizenship in the Philippines in 2004 and a solid basis to track its evolution over time. The author’s intent is to revisit the topic biennially, with scheduled follow-up planned for 2006.
Statement of the problem
The study on the current status of corporate citizenship in the Philippines seeks to establish a baseline of the CSR motivations, extent of implementation, obstacles and expectations among the micro, small, medium and large enterprises in the country.
Specifically, the study will seek answers to the following questions:
(1) What is the emerging view of CSR among business organisations with regard to:
1. good corporate citizenship
2. business case for CSR
3. public expectations
4. issues where they believe businesses should play an active role?
(2) To what extent do the following factors drive the respondents’ CSR efforts:
1. community expectations
2. company traditions and values
3. business strategy Australian Association for



References: Brinkman, J (2003) Does corporate social responsibility lead to improved financial performance? An analysis of the electric utility industry Carroll, AB (1979) ‘A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance’, Academy of Management Review, ProQuest database, accessed 8 July 2004 Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College (2003) The state of corporate citizenship in the United States: 2003, http://www.bc.edu/centers/ccc/, accessed 28 April 2004.Clarkson, MBE (1995) ‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance’, Academy of Management Review, ProQuest database, accessed 17 May 2004. Dunlap, WP (2000) ‘Canonical correlation and chi-square: relationships and interpretation’, Journal of General Psychology, ProQuest database, accessed 17 May 2004. Francois, R and Amstrong, A (2003) ‘Ethics as a risk management strategy: the Australian experience’, Journal of Business Ethics, ProQuest database, accessed 13 June 2004. Freeman, RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Pitman Publishing Company. Friedman, M (1970) ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’, New York Times Magazine, 13 September, p 32ff. Ganchero, EG (2004) ‘Benchmarking corporate citizenship practice in the Philippines’, DLS Journal of Business and Management, vol 1, no 1, pp 33–43. Harrison, JS and Freeman, RE (1999) ‘Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Horvath, DJ (2004) ‘Competitive strategies of the future: can corporate social responsibility and the bottom-line work together?’ Unpublished paper presented at DSL-PSI Graduate School of Business RCBC Campus, Makati City, 25 October. Interactions (2005) Research Symposium on the State of Corporate Citizenship in the Philippines, 22 January (unpublished). Itkonen, Laura (2003) ‘Corporate social responsibility and financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal, Proquest database, accessed 28 April 2004. Maximiano, JM (2003) Corporate social responsibility: basic principles and best practices: historico-philosophical issues in international business, PLDT/ACM, Manila. Orlitzky, M (2001) ‘Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social Orlitzsky, M, Schmidt, FL and Rynes, SL (2003) ‘Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis’, Organization Studies, ProQuest database, accessed 8 July 2004 Oxford Research (2003) Survey and analysis of tools in connection with CSR and sustainability, Danish Confederation of Trade Unions, Copenhagen, http://www.lo.dk, accessed 8 December 2003. Pasamonte, JN (2005) ‘A critique on methodology’, Research Symposium on the State of Corporate Citizenship in thePhilippines, 22 January. Phillips, R (2003) Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics, Berrett-Koehler Publisher, San 18 Raynard, P and Forstater, M (2002) Corporate social responsibility: implications for small and Enterprises Branch. Simon, H (1997) Administrative behavior, The Free Press, New York Taskforce on the Churches and Corporate Responsibility (2000) Bench marks for measuring business performance: corporate social and environmental responsibility − Waddock, SA and Graves, SB (1997) ’The corporate social performance–financial performance link’, Strategic Management Journal, ProQuest database, accessed 28 April 2004 Wood, DJ (1991) ‘Corporate social performance revisited’, Academy of Management Review, ProQuest database, accessed 28 April 2004.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Rock of Ages Case Study

    • 3726 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Friedman, Milton. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times. September 13.…

    • 3726 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedman criticizes business managers who engage in socially responsible behavior by using the argument that there is a different set of criteria for social responsible behavior of a person, who happens to be a corporate executive (businessman) versus that same person acting as an individual in a free-society. A business manager’s main responsibility is to maximize the profit of the corporation. When that person combines those roles and directs a corporation to take on a social responsible cause, because it would either increase cost or decrease revenue, it would be equivalent to a tax on the customers, shareholders and employees without their consent and in some cases, knowledge.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.” New York Times Magazine, September 13: 32-33)…

    • 2712 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Friedman, M. F. (n.d.). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In A. Allhoff & A. Vaidya (Eds.), Business in Ethical Focus: An Anthology(pp. 65-69). Peterborough: Broadview.…

    • 2229 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oreck Company Case Study

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "Milton Friedman and the Social Responsibility of Business." Worldchanging: Bright Green. Tue. 02 Feb. 2010. .…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Friedman, Milton. (September 13, 1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine , pp. 122-126.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thirty-five years ago, Milton Friedman wrote a famous article for The New York Times Magazine whose title aptly summed up its main point: "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits." Friedman had no patience for capitalists who claimed that "business is not concerned 'merely' with profit but also with promoting desirable 'social' ends; that business has a 'social conscience' and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers." Friedman wrote that such people are "preaching pure and unadulterated socialism. Businessmen who talk this way are unwitting puppets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades."…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    guide reading

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Friedman argues that the objective of a corporation is to maximize the profits within the guidelines of the law in the free and open society. If the corporate executive has a “social responsibility”, which means his is to act that is not in the interest of his employers.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Ethics 101 Week 1

    • 4442 Words
    • 18 Pages

    • ‘The one and only social responsibility of business is to make profits’ (the economics guru Milton Friedman)…

    • 4442 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Friedman, M. (2005). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In C.M. Boardman & A.N. Sandomir (ED.), Foundations of business thought (pp. 182-186). Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is obvious to many that the goal of a company is to make a profit. According to Milton Friedman, what many businesses do not say is that this is their only responsibility and that it is to make the highest profit possible. As members of society, we should be concerned that these decisions will have affect us. I believe that a business has the responsibility to make a profit, but it has many others as well. A business not only has to make a profit but think about the long term affects such as their employees and other stakeholders. Throughout this paper there will be many views that Friedman may not have been thought about before. To begin, I will describe why Friedman the writer of “Social Responsibility of a Business is to Make a Profit” had a off set view on business, followed by a better representation of the social responsibility of a business as a whole.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Busin

    • 2022 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business to increase its profits. New York Times, New York , N.Y. 32-33, 122-124, 126. http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html…

    • 2022 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Csr Case Study

    • 6604 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Abstract: Starting from the times of barter system to today’s modern era of plastic money, the mankind has trodden a remarkably long path. Undoubtedly “profitability” has always been the driving force and an undercurrent behind all this development; but as every coin has two facets; growing cut throat competition and business rivalries started taking heavy toll on the quality, transparency, environment and the society in general endangering the peaceful coexistence of business and society. The businesses houses started realizing that they would have to rise over and above the profitability and take care of all those associated with their survival in the society directly or indirectly. This realization resulted into the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). This research paper moves around developing an understanding about the corporate social responsibility (CSR), delving into its concept and finding out its scope taking the case study of the TATA Group under Mr. Ratan Tata who has exemplified the sense of responsibility towards the upliftment of common masses and protection of the environment and development of the nation. Keywords: Corporate citizenship, Corporate social responsibility, Employee, Productivity, Profitability, Society, Stakeholders. I. Introduction…

    • 6604 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leading corporate citizenship today demands an integrated—or integral—perspective on the way that a company articulates its purposes and how it operates day-to-day with respect to its numerous stakeholders. Arguably it will become increasingly difficult for companies to ignore the responsibilities that are inherent to the impacts that they have on societies and stakeholders as demands for transparency and accountability for corporate impacts continue to mount. This paper will present evidence that a combination of vision and values linked to operating practices that respect stakeholders contribute to value-added—and possibly to competitive advantage—for companies. Values that underpin leading corporate citizenship include respect for stakeholders, mindfulness about corporate impacts, integrity in all senses of the word, which help to create trust. Leading corporate citizenship also demands working with (not managing) stakeholders through on-going processes of engagement, dialogue, and reciprocity, and a willingness to be accountable for corporate activities, while providing transparency for external stakeholders. Further, I will argue that although most companies are still far from achieving this integrated approach to corporate it is becoming increasingly clear what stakeholder-related practices companies need to have in place to become leading corporate citizens. Thus, the paper will present a prescriptive model, based on current best practice, of the ways that leading corporate citizens can potentially conceive of their citizenship practices.…

    • 7308 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays