Preview

Locker Searches

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
569 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Locker Searches
Wonjung Hwang
Mr. Chonko
English 10 Period 3
19 November 2012

Locker Searches

We've all seen enough crime shows to know what to do if the police knock on your door and demand to search your property: stand, look indignant and demand to see their warrant. After all, it's your property, and unless you give permission or a judge orders the search, you should have control over what you have, right? Yes—provided you're not a student. If you're in a school environment, teachers and administrators can search without either permission or a warrant. School should search their students’ lockers because school is responsible for their students, no privacy concerns, and to protect students. Every school is responsible for the students and the safety of them. For their safety, schools have the right to search the students’ lockers if they are suspicious about having inappropriate things such as drugs, alcohols, and weapons in their lockers. By searching the lockers, they make sure all the students are in safe environment around the school. Diane Cooper, the president of the East Orange Board of Education says “Students have to feel that they are protected from unauthorized or unprovoked harassment.” It is the schools responsibility to keep the school safe and clean, and to keep the students protected. There is no privacy concerns while locker searching. Students are merely allowed to use lockers as they keep sports equipment, library books, textbooks, and so on. Moreover, the books and equipments which stay in lockers are the property of schools. Lockers are also originally schools’ property as well and they can be taken back without notice. If the students know that they are going to be in trouble for certain thing, they should not even bring it to school. In addition, being in an agreement for the locker searches is a part of being in a school community where you have to accept the schools’ rules and responsibilities. Students must trust teachers and police

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    T.L.O. is a case that argued the right to privacy rights at school. The result of this case was that students belongings can be searched but not for no good reason. Furthermore, the case started when a fourteen year old student at Piscataway High School in New Jersey was caught smoking in a bathroom by a teacher. Once the student was caught her purse was then searched by the teacher. Found in the purse was a pack of cigarettes, rolling papers, and a small amount of marijuana. Because of the belongings discovered by the teacher, police were called in and the fourteen year old student openly admitted to selling drugs on school property. Furthermore, during her trial she was found guilty and was put on probation. However, fourteen year old, Terry argued that the search of her purse was a violation of the fourth amendment, “unreasonable searches and seizures.” This case is a great example of a landmark case because it started the beginning of future decisions regarding searches and seizures at…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Best V. New Jersey Case

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    School administrators and law enforcement officers have different regulations when a search or seizure is being conducted, especially concerning that of a minor. School administrators only need reasonable suspicion to search a student while law enforcement officers must have probable cause. In the cases of Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding, the issues of search and seizure of a student in school are laid out in different scenarios that clearly portray the difference between a constitutional search and an unconstitutional search. The concept of reasonable suspicion is sufficient for the extended search in the Best V. New Jersey case because the student was in clear violation of school policy and the search was necessary to maintain safety and order in the school;…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill”, the students’ expectation of privacy outweighs the obligation of the school leaders to maintain good order and discipline in that there is no clear and reasonable threat to student safety or order. The students’ constitutional rights should not be jeopardized over twenty dollars. Furthermore, a bathroom search of any students must be reasonable related to the objectives of the search and must not be excessively intrusive. Since there was only twenty-dollars involved this case, a bathroom search would be highly unconstitutional considering the age of the students and amount of money involved. This is evidenced by a similar case Safford vs. Redding 2008.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Random Locker Searchs

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page

    First and foremost, irregular locker searches help to reduce violence and drug use in schools. Randomized locker searches help to find any weapons or drugs being hidden by student in lockers. THe searches can help to save lives, if there is a weapon found. If it is suspected that the student id breaking a law, or even school rule, a locker search may be carried out to see if the allegations are true.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - a school official may properly conduct a search of student’s person if the official has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed or reasonable cause to believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline or enforce school policies.”…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bookbag and locker searches should be done primarily because it lowers the amounts of deaths and injuries occurring in schools. Multiple families have lost loved ones in result of school shootings. For example, twelve students killed by students in the Columbine High School shooting; Twenty students killed in the Sandy Hook shooting. However, students are not the only ones in danger teachers are greatly affected by this, for their efforts to protect their students. For Example, one teacher killed in the Columbine and multiple injured, six teachers killed in the Sandy Hook shooting. This is only two of the many school shootings occurring in the United States. When people know they'll be searched upon entering a school or randomly searched…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Students and staff members feel emotionally and physical safe, and the school’s policies and facilities promote student safety.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    School officals need only reasonable suspicion to search…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As whoever is in school from the outside the school is always aware of, which provides a sense of security for children and parents. Furthermore, there are policies in place that are guidelines for children on what is safe for them to do or use. For example, there is always adult supervision present both outside and…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is assess the limits search and seizure in public schools, apply specific ruling, analyze the New Jersey v. T.L.O. case and explain, recommend changes to existing (specific) laws to create a fairer educational setting in terms of search and seizure and peer review. School officials are responsible for providing a safe and orderly school environment. The officials are required to address disrupting or unsafe behavior that violate school policy and rules. It may require searching of students and their belongings. Dealing with disrupted behavior is a difficult situation that requires decision-making on when, where and how to conduct a search and seizure. My assess limit search and seizure is on hunch or just general search. School officials must have reasonable or proper cause to search.…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To them, it protects students rather then invading their privacy. Going through student's things doesn't ensure safety, it makes them not trust school authority. Others believe that students can't be trusted with bags in school. Again, this causes students to not trust advisors at school. If administrators want students to trust them, they shouldn't search their things without their permission. Limitations on student's Fourth Amendment rights are inexcusable.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    14th Amendment Essay

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The lockers have been given to the students expecting them to take care of it and being responsible over it. What is the need to go through it? I have been given a locker since sixth grade and never once has a teacher much less a principle gone through my locker. If they were to go through my locker it would make me feel like i'm a suspect for something I have no connection with.On our way into school each day student’s book bags are checked each day. There have even been instances in which the security guards have taken over an hour to go through the student's belongings, while teachers, administrators and principals go through without being checked not only is it hypocritical but unjust. Teenagers should be given the benefit of the doubt. I have been present in an event where a teacher unjustifiably read his messages out loud after his phone rang in class without him even having it in his hands. It wasn't in the teacher’s responsibility nor authority to go through his messages much less reveal his messages.We are called the next generation yet we are restricted to are given liberty's by others insecurities. If people can't practice what they preach then they should change their speech. I would rather be considered a rebellious teenager than a lying hypocrite.Trust has become nothing but a blur and a silver lining with perseption, perseption is all that they can see in the end of the…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teachers and administrators should be allowed to search students’ lockers because being able to search lockers creates a safer learning environment. According to opinions on the website “Debate.org”, 51% of the people who voted believe that teachers and administrators should be allowed to search lockers. Although searching students’ lockers may be against the fourth amendment ( “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Search and Seizure

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe that search and seizure is very important for our country and our rights. Search and Seizure helps to protect our fourth amendment right, which is the right to privacy. The Search and seizure says that law enforcement cannot search or put anyone under arrest unless they have evidence to support that action (Murray). I believe that search and seizure is important to protecting our privacy rights. If police so not have any evidence against you, that they can’t search you, your car your house or anything.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays