examines a variety of available information to find the truth amongst all the fiction. Moving to the third chapter, the “urban environment” is discussed in detail, while addressing immigration and the inhabitants. Chapter four addressed the neglect to the people of the East End, and social problems and inequality in regards to theses people. One of the more important sections of Gray’s book is chapter five. Within chapter five, Gray discusses the growth and impact of media and the effects it had on the people of 1888 and even the people of today, which will be discussed further in the second paragraph. Onward through chapters six through eight, Gray more closely examines the lives of women, who were forced into prostitution due to the harsh realities of the East End, the criminal class in chapter seven, and finally the police in chapter eight. The final chapter labelled “London’s Shadows: The Darker Side of the Victorian Capital” (Gray, 231) concludes Gray’s novel by bringing together all of the previous information from the past chapters to paint a complete picture of the life of London’s East End. Gray’s purpose of creating this novel was to inform people of the unbiased lives of the people of London and the effects the Whitechapel murders had upon all the aspects of the community and its people. Throughout Gray’s novel “London’s Shadows: the Dark Side of the Victorian City”, he continually mentions how the story of the Whitechapel murders and furthermore Jack the Ripper are being diluted by half-truths, fiction and biases to better suit one’s own personal suspect. In regards to the dilution of the Whitechapel murders, Gray states:
I am not a ripperologist and it is not my intention to offer up my own solution to the mystery. Nor is the identity of the murderer the most interesting thing about the case – arguably his anonymity has allowed legions of investigators to delve into the archives in the hope of uncovering something fresh to say about the murders. While there are some excellent histories, notably the work of Donald Rumbelow and Paul Begg in particular, the genre is bedevilled with poorly researched and badly written studies that simply repeat the work of previous histories. Worse still some recent books have attempted to fit the facts of the case, such they are, to suit their own favourite suspect. (Gray, 4) The attempt “to fit the facts of the case” to better suit one’s own suspect does not only apply to modern literature but also in the past during the Whitechapel murders. Returning to both chapter one, four and five, Gray discussed the increase of media and the growth of the public paper. The Whitechapel murders being the spectacles they were, help increase the popularity of sources of media such as the paper. Much like modern literature, the media of the past also had their culprits. Sources of media would report that the culprit could be a doctor due to the remains of the victims or a foreigner immigrant. Like the modern theories in regards to the identity of the killer, facts were used to better suit one’s own suspect, resulting and aggression towards these groups of people being blamed. The strength of Gray’s novel comes from the fact that his goal is not to identify the killer, but to better understand the people of London’s East End and how the murder effected their lives. By utilizing vast range of information from a range of fields of study, Grey creates a grander picture of the struggles, hardships, racism and lack of security that the people East End London faced day to day. Gray uses his work to analyze the conclusions of the writings of others on the topic of the Whitechapel murders. Through using the wide range of sources to try and present an unbiased description of the East End of London, Gray demonstrates that no one answer can tell who Jack the Ripper beyond a reasonable doubt. Gray states that without absolute evidence, there cannot be an identity of Jack in which everyone is satisfied. When evaluating Gray’s evidence and use of citations within his work, one can see the vast range of information he used to construct what the East End of London once was and to argue against other works claiming to have identified the Ripper. Instead of a narrow approach of accumulating information, Gray obtains knowledge in a more broad sense. Gray examined the hardships of women, who eventual turned to prostitution to survive Gray explained the racism in regards to immigrates and how they became alienated the Victorians. Gray went into detail about the poor and working classes. Gray told the struggles of the police that tried to maintain control, who received backlash from the people and the press for their inability to capture the Ripper. Grey explores many more aspects besides the few listed but that is beside the point. The point being make here is that, instead of simply trying to identify the Ripper, Gray uses a wide range of information to recreate and better understand the environment that is the East End of London during a time effected by the events of the Whitechapel murders. In conclusion to Drew Gray’s novel “London’s Shadows: the Dark Side of the Victorian City”, he set out to reconstruct the world of East End London to better understand its people and their problems.
Gray is successful in using the Whitechapel murders of Jack the Ripper to explore “prostitution and pornography, poverty, revolutionary politics, immigration, the creation of a criminal underworld and the development of policing”. (Bloomsbury) Through using a wide range of scholarly knowledge, Drew Gray’s achieves in creating a novel telling the past lives of the people of East End
London.