I would say these oppositions are a few of the most prominent and interesting stylistic feature of his poetic style. Lorca juxtaposes a kind of connotative permanence, as evidenced in the almost defiant and feminized tree and peasant girl, against the impermanent bravado and raw sexuality associated with the boys. It may be that each opposition (the girl and nature v. the boys and humanity) and the interaction (or lack thereof) is itself a kind of allegory; perhaps Lorca’s showing the experiential truth that human beings are torn between the desire to connect with the land and the agrarian self, but the modern world compels them to deny that desire in favour of satisfying our desire for a more human connection (Marxist & Freudian readings aside, the possibilities are seemingly
I would say these oppositions are a few of the most prominent and interesting stylistic feature of his poetic style. Lorca juxtaposes a kind of connotative permanence, as evidenced in the almost defiant and feminized tree and peasant girl, against the impermanent bravado and raw sexuality associated with the boys. It may be that each opposition (the girl and nature v. the boys and humanity) and the interaction (or lack thereof) is itself a kind of allegory; perhaps Lorca’s showing the experiential truth that human beings are torn between the desire to connect with the land and the agrarian self, but the modern world compels them to deny that desire in favour of satisfying our desire for a more human connection (Marxist & Freudian readings aside, the possibilities are seemingly