Preview

Plea Bargaining Process In The Criminal Justice System

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
764 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plea Bargaining Process In The Criminal Justice System
Plea Bargaining Process The plea bargaining process is very important to the criminal justice system because without it the criminal justice system would grind to a halt. Plea-bargaining is important because if every case went to a trial it would take years for criminals to get from the time of arrest till the time of trial. The video we saw showed an example of how the process works to get criminals who plea guilty to committing minor crimes through the system faster so that the courts can concentrate on those criminals who commit major crimes. In this video you can see some of the variables that enter into the plea-bargaining system and how they can be fair and unfair to the parties involved. You can see the quality of legal representation …show more content…
In all cases the criminals were career criminals who have been in and out of trouble for years and in all cases they plead guilty and received little or no jail time. While you might think this is good for the criminals and they should be happy about their sentences it is not good. These criminals suffer from many problems, are in some cases homeless, and they are in need of desperate help. They last place they want to be or should be is back on the streets. There are few variables that cause public defenders and prosecutors to come to the bargains that they do and a very big reason is that jails are overcrowded and can't handle the volume of people that commit crimes. So in that case if someone doesn't commit a very serious crime most often they will return to the streets within a couple of days. This is very unfair to the criminal, victim, and society. These people need help and by them going back onto the streets they are a liability to them selves and …show more content…
With that comes a lot of room for corruption to occur. Also with pressure being put on the public defender and prosecutors because of limited jail space it is hard for justice to be served. I believe that some stronger controls should be entered into the plea bargaining system. The plea bargaining system should be monitored more closely to watch for corruption in the system. Also to help the prosecutor and public defender to serve justice a little better there would need to be more holding facilities so that more criminals that deserved it would end up in
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    WK 3 Individual COURTROOM WORKGROUP
    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages

    WK 3 Individual COURTROOM WORKGROUP

    One of the important roles a judge, a criminal prosecutor, and a criminal defense attorney will carry out is called, a “courtroom work group”. The courtroom work group interact on a daily basis by these three entities joining together to converse over matters such as if the case has probable cause to convict the offender or whether or not if there is enough evidence to go forward with a criminal trial. Normally, the prosecutor will try to persuade the defense that they do not have a case or try to talk the defense into a guilty plea or possible bail. In other words, anything they can do to speed up the process with various types of negotiations. The judge has to remain ethical and fair to see both sides of the prosecution and defense to determine if the negotiations are valid enough to go through with. Even though the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney are the main officials of the courtroom work group, we cannot forget about other members that play a part as well. The minor (respectfully) members or other members that make up a courtroom work group are the court clerk, the bailiff, and the court reporter. The court clerk upholds all the records while the court reporter makes sure he/she transcribes the official proceedings. The bailiff helps to keep court order throughout a trial. Although I can understand how the main officers discuss the case and try to solve it without a trial, I feel that every case should be heard. The major problem with this though is time and money. In order for every offender to have a case without the prosecutor trying to convince the defense into something else, there would have to be a lot more courthouses with a lot more main officers. The only way this would ever happen is to hike up the taxes and no one wants their taxes to increase.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Week 3 CJA 394 Court Trends

    • 1550 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Week 3 CJA 394 Court Trends

    In other occasions court administrators, prosecutors and judges prefer to go for plea bargains to help reduce case volumes and in other cases granted time to the parties so they can prepare themselves for the case or to obtain further documentation to avoid losing time during the next hearing moving the case for a date where they might not have such big overload. Another option that the court administrators recur is to divide cases upon the crime in order to fit all short non complicated crimes in a day vs. having many complicated cases all together in one day since that would delay the case flow.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Of Criminal Justice By Adam Foss
    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of Criminal Justice By Adam Foss

    The Adam Foss's video lecture was informative. I was impressed how his desire for prestige and power had changed because he realized that his decision as a young prosecutor could damage a person for life. However, I agree with him in his point of view that the Criminal Justice System needs to be reform by providing resources to help in understanding why and what gave the defendant the mindset to engage in criminal activities. Nevertheless, our prison system is not equipped to create a productive system because of its negative environment only just remake some of them into a career criminal. This is what I have seen and had many inmates to share with me during my assessment interview. Therefore, as Mr. Foss has stated if the Criminal Justice…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adj 215 Criminology "Rational Choice Crime Control Strategies"
    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Adj 215 Criminology "Rational Choice Crime Control Strategies"

    A longer prison sentence is nothing but a joke to the common criminal, with jails and prisons being so “comfortable” now. Any criminal that keeps his or her head down and their nose clean can get any sentence cut in half for “good behavior.” Not to mention the entire system is too crowded as is and society knows it.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargain Research Paper
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plea Bargain Research Paper

    Cole, Plea-bargaining is negotiating a settlement between the prosecutor and the defense attorney, that would exchange a guilty plea for a lighter sentence.. Generally if the prosecutor is willing to lower the sentence, the defense will accept and plea guilty to the crime he or she was accused of. Roughly thirty-five years ago, plea-bargaining was not discussed outside of the courtroom. It was a “secret” of the court and done behind closed doors. Now, people know what plea-bargaining is, and is now a very controversial subject in society. There are positives and negative aspects of plea-bargaining in the case of Councilman…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ins and Outs of Plea Bargaining
    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ins and Outs of Plea Bargaining

    When it comes to plea bargaining, there are two different types that can be offered to the defendant by the prosecutor: sentence bargaining and charge bargaining. Sentence bargaining is when the accused is informed of what the sentence will be with a guilty plea and is useful in helping the prosecutor to obtain a conviction by offering the minimum, instead of the maximum sentence for the charge. If the defendant is facing serious charges and does not want to chance receiving a maximum sentence during trial, they may enter a guilty plea in order to serve the least amount of time possible. Charge bargaining is when the prosecutor offers to either charge the accused with a lesser charge, or to reduce the number of charges that have been filed against him/her, in exchange for a guilty plea. For example, if the defendant is charged with a DUI, driving with an expired license, and driving with expired…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    Plea Bargaining has become a major factor in our criminal justice system. Like all controversial topics there are many pros and cons that make it hard to decide what is right and wrong about the situation. I personally feel that plea bargaining should be abolished. Plea bargains are creating harm to our criminal justice system. Due to plea bargains the criminal justice system is being undermined and losing control of what is happening to criminals.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    Plea bargaining is the essence of the criminal justice system, and it is the process in which a defendant pleads guilty to a criminal charge in order to receive some consideration from the state. There are various types of plea bargaining deals that defendants may accept, which include charge bargaining, count bargaining, and sentence bargaining. Charge bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty to a less serious crime than the one originally charged with. Count bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty to partial charges or counts, but not all of the charges presented against them. Lastly, sentence bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty in exchange for leniency in sentencing.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargain: Why It Violates The Six Amendment
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plea Bargain: Why It Violates The Six Amendment

    The main fault that I see with a plea bargain is that it violates the six amendment. The reason why the sixth amendment is in violation is that plea bargaining goes against what it stands for. The sixth amendment states that everyone has the right to a fair trial; however, most cases are not even analyzed in front of a judge or jury because of a plea bargain. The main reason a plea bargain is put into play is to push a case through the system faster and resolve it quicker. Furthermore, everyone knows that when situations are rushed that information is likely to be missed. For example, there are many situations where defendants take a plea bargain to stray away from more intense punishment. However, many individuals who take this bargain are…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    The question we are debating today is whether or not plea-bargaining undermines the Criminal justice system? The job of the Criminal justice system is to protect the citizens of the United States. How are we protecting them if we give criminals shorter sentences than they deserve? When we plea bargain we release more criminals back into the streets and put citizens of the United States' safety at risk. A plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case in which a prosecutor and a defendant arrange to settle the case against the defendant. The United states department of justice's mission statement reads: To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. This statement is being undermined because not…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Plea Bargaining
    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page

    Arguments Against Plea Bargaining

    Whether or not it is possible to entirely eliminate plea bargaining in all its forms and varieties, I am not persuaded that it is desirable to do so. But I am no friend of plea bargaining in the unrestrained forms of it that are evident in the United States. In a nutshell, the normative position I shall advance is this: individuals charged with crimes who are willing to confess or plead guilty should be granted modest and fixed sentence discounts in exchange for doing so. Charge bargaining, and that which often accompanies and enables it, strategic overcharging, should be strongly discouraged. Trial penalties, that is, additional increments of punishment assigned to individuals who exercise their right to trial, should be prohibited. However,…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    As Nataskie stated above, there is a place and a need for plea bargaining in our criminal justice system. Although it is true that plea bargaining gives a guilty person the opportunity to admit to their crime and accept the punishment for it, they are likely more motivated by the fact that plea bargaining involves the perpetrator receiving a reduced sentence of some sort. Another reason for continuing with plea bargaining, as a tool in the criminal justice system, is because often it affords the prosecutor the means necessary to get a lesser criminal to testify against a more significant criminal who otherwise might go free. Plea bargaining should maintain an active role in all justice systems regardless of whether they are local, state,…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    I do believe that there are instances where plea bargaining can be an effective tool in the criminal justice system, however, as it stands, the overuse of the plea bargain by prosecutors has diminished it’s potential worth as a true bargaining tool by their flagrant daily misuse. While it is understood that the case load for the courts is overwhelmed and an alternative method of securing some form of justice is needed to alleviate the overrun system, the use of the plea bargain to alleviate the overcrowded courts is not completely acceptable.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Importance Of Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice
    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Importance Of Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice

    The prosecutors job is to prosecute those responsible for the crimes and to punish the guilty ones within the confines of the criminal justice system. A plea bargain is a tool that the prosecutor can use for the purpose of speeding up the judicial process without violating the rights of those accused. Not only can plea bargaining minimize the amount of time it takes to get a criminal to the…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics