Preview

Lord Penzance's Definition of Marriage

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2104 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lord Penzance's Definition of Marriage
It is impossible to provide a single definition of marriage due to the religious, cultural and ethnic diversity within our society1. However, the most cited definition of marriage in law is that in Hyde v Hyde & Woodmansee 2, where Lord Penzance defines marriage as:
"the voluntary union... of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others3".
This definition puts forward two factors of marriage: firstly, that it is a voluntary union; and secondly, that it is between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others. In order to critically discuss whether Lord Penzance 's definition of marriage reflects the contemporary legal position and social attitudes in England and Wales, with reference to legal authorities and academic commentary, both points will be considered in turn. It will now be considered whether marriage must be a voluntary union.
Each person marrying in the United Kingdom must give their consent. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses4. Likewise, according to the Matrimonial Causes Act5, a marriage is voidable when either party to the marriage fails to give a valid consent to it due to either duress6, mistake7, unsoundness of mind8 or otherwise9.
Justifiable reasons for non-consent has to be sufficiently serious and usually involves some threat of violence. In Buckland v Buckland10, it was found that a man had only agreed to marriage due to his reasonable fear of imprisonment in Malta if he had failed to comply with the marriage.
What should be noted is that according to the law, the lack of consent renders a marriage voidable and not void. This means that the marriage will exist in the eyes of the law until it has been annulled by the courts11. Without an annulment, it will be regarded as a valid marriage12. A person seeking to nullify their marriage on the grounds of non-consent would have to prove it. This may be difficult



Bibliography: Cases Buckland v Buckland (1967) 2 AER 300 Goodwin v UK [2002] 2 FCR 577 Hirani v Hirani (1982) 4 FLR 232 Hyde v Hyde & Woodmansee (1866) LR 1 PD 130 In the Estate of Park [1954] P 112 Parry v UK (Application No. 42971/05) SH v NB (2009) EWHC 3274 Consolidating Resources Conglomerate (2011) The Common Laws of Power: Unspoken Words Bloomington: AuthorHouse Herring, J "Forced Marriages: School Holidays Prompt Warning" (2013) BBC News UK http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23639070 [last accessed 28/11/13] Henrich, J Khatkar, P. (2011) "The British Muslim Men who Love 'Both their Wives '". BBC Asian Network: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15032947 [last accessed 02/12/2013] Office for National Statistics (2011) http://www.statistics.gov.uk [last accessed 02/12/13]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    LAW: A contract made upon consideration of marriage is unenforceable. Such an agreement falls within the statue of frauds and writing is required to enforce the agreement.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    marriage typically argue that the institution of marriage is defined as a religious union between…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Blankenhorn is a world authority on the institution of marriage. One of the biggest debates concerning marriage today is whether we should expand the concept to include same-sex marriage. Blankenhorn thinks not, and in his book titled, The Future of Marriage, sets out to make the case against homosexual marriage. But he does so, pre-eminently, by making the case for the institution of heterosexual marriage. Blankenhorn first seeks to get a handle on what marriage is, and then he shows how it has been experienced over the centuries. The first half of the book is about what marriage is, and how it has developed. The second half deals with the challenge of same-sex marriage. Although homosexual couples should have the right to love one another without experiencing prejudice, their unions should not be labeled as a “marriage”, for this would cause our society to rethink the values of marriage and how it pertains to children.…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are also introduced to the main character's family, such as his wife Elaine, and his son Jamie. We also see what each person's role is within the family.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He reinforces that “Marriage, the Supreme Court declared in 1967, is ‘one of the basic civil rights of men’ (and, presumably of woman as well). The freedom to marry, said the Court, is “essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness” (Stoddard 722). The choice whether or not to wed belongs strictly to each individual person. Marriage is not just an emblematic formality. Marriage initiates rights, privileges and entitles partners to group insurance, pension plans and tax advantages (Stoddard 722). In addition, “Marriage creates families and promotes social stability. In an increasingly loveless world, those who wish to committed themselves to a relationship founded upon devotion should be encouraged, not scorned” (Stoddard…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Indian Mascots

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Miner, B. 1991. The Danger of Harmless School Mascots. In Rethinking Columbus: A special issue of Rethinking Schools: 67.…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Studies Family Essay

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Traditionally, marriage was considered to be a voluntary union between a man and a woman defined by Hyde Vs Hyde and Woodmansee (1866) case and the unit of family was that of the “nuclear family” comprising of a mother, father and naturally conceived dependent children.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The social institution under which a man and woman establish their decision to live as husband and wife by legal loyalty, the state, condition, or relationship of being married; wedlock, a relationship in which two people have pledged themselves to each other in the manner of a husband and wife, these definitions describe one of Gods greatest honors given to man . Marriage is the binding of two people into one union. In today’s society people get married and the easy way out of the situation is to get a divorce. In some cases there is nothing else to do, but there are also people who are selfish and do not want to be held down. In this paper I am going to show you the customs and traditions of marriages before Christ, compared to the marriages of today’s society.…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Description. Forced marriage is a crime in Australia, and is punishable by up to seven years in prison. Under Commonwealth law a forced marriage is one where a person gets married without fully and freely consenting because they have been coerced, threatened or deceived. A person can be coerced through obvious means such as force, detention or duress, or through more subtle means like psychological oppression,…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Marriage means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word spouse refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.” (Defense of Marriage Act)…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Bennett

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are several similarities between the two essays, despite the conflicting viewpoints. Both authors discuss the definition of marriage, which, to some, is a union between a man and a woman.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is rooted in our traditional Western values that marriage is intended to be between man and woman. The dictionary defines it as the social institution under which a male and female establish their decision to live as husband and wife by legal commitments and religious ceremonies.1 I do not believe marriage should have an alternate definition. President George W. Bush once addressed our nation stating:…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theology Of Marriage

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The secret to a happy marriage is if you can be at peace with someone within four walls, if you are content because the one you love is near to you, either upstairs or downstairs, or in the same room, and you feel that warmth that you don't find very often, then that is what love is all about.” This quote by Bruce Forsyth does a great job of summing up what marriage is all about, peace and love. There are many marriages out there in current day that do not last long, but for those that chose the right person, marriage has many beautiful characteristics that make it so special to one’s heart. Marriage, however, was thought of differently with some similarities in the past and had a few perspectives I will be discussing. The four perspectives in the western society were spiritual, social, contractual, and natural.…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justified Discrimination

    • 16496 Words
    • 66 Pages

    by Erin Culley, Department of Law, University of Greenwich [1] ABSTRACTThe creation of the civil partnership was a clear compromise between the need to recognise a formalised relationship between same-sex couples while still acknowledging the protests of those against the creation of gay marriage. Many were thrilled with the symbolic step taken by Parliament, whereas others were appalled at the creation of a new institution rather than simply permitting same-sex couples access into the institution of marriage. This was the subject of the challenge to the High Court in the case of Wilkinson v Kitzinger [2007] 1 FLR 296, where it was argued that the creation of a similar but different institution for same-sex couples was discriminatory and conflicted with the European Convention on Human Rights. This article criticises the decision of Sir Mark Potter, who ruled that though it can be seen as discriminatory, such discrimination is justified on the legitimate ground of the protection of family life. It is argued in this paper that the justifications put forward have no legitimate basis and that the decision was erroneous and was based on a culturally conditioned heterosexual predisposition.KEYWORDS: Civil partnership, marriage, discrimination, same-sex, sexual orientation, human rights. INTRODUCTIONIn recent years, several countries – the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada and South Africa – have legislated to permit same-sex marriages. While the law of England and Wales does not allow such marriages, the Civil Partnership Act 2004 has created a legally recognised relationship for same-sex couples, the civil partnership. Apart from minor differences which will be discussed later, there are no noteworthy legal differences between a civil partnership and a marriage. However, in 2006, a same-sex couple challenged its compatibility with the European Convention on…

    • 16496 Words
    • 66 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics