Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Louis and Peter Compare Contrast

Powerful Essays
891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Louis and Peter Compare Contrast
Marielle Sheck 12-8-12
AP World Ms. Milne

Compare Contrast Essay

As Europe entered the eighteenth century a new emphasis was placed on developing colonies, earning money though taxes and a new system of justice and law. Great monarchs such as Peter the Great of Russia, and Louis XIV of France established many strategies in order to keep up with the rest of Europe. Both monarchs had similar goals such as to control the noble class, possess a professional army, and their views on religion. Peter’s goal to expand his empire through the use of his army, his tolerance of religion, his role as a “man of the people”, and his control of his nobles through taxation, differed from Louis non-tolerance of religion, control of his nobles through attendance at Versailles, use of an army for protection, and his divine right to rule.

Louis and Peter had similar goals such as to establish a large professional army within their empires. These armies differed from armies in previous centuries because they contained highly trained men with advanced and mature technology, as opposed to the armies from earlier times that were composed of peasants and low technology artillery. Although each monarch had a large professional army, the reasons for why these armies were so important to each empire differed. Louis needed a strong army to protect his borders from enemies. Since France is in the center of Europe, and is bordered by major empires such as England and Spain, it was essential to have an army that could protect France from these threatening neighbors. Peter needed an army in order to expand his young growing empire. Louis came to power with an already developed empire, which had already conquered many lands; whereas Peter had to start from scratch and begin to conquer new lands. A large army was crucial for Peter so that he could invade and conquer new territories for Russia. Without a strong and powerful army, Russia would not be able to grow and expand as an empire, and end up being isolated to the West. Both empires needed a strong professional army, but their reasons for the army differed.

Another main goal of both monarchs was to control the noble class. Managing the nobles was vital because they were a large threat to the monarchs themselves because they threatened the power of the monarch. Controlling the nobles would ensure that both monarchs would contain absolute power themselves, and maintain order within their empires. The strategies used by both monarchs eliminated the nobles chance to overthrow them. Both Louis and Peter differed in the way that they managed the noble class. Louis spent an enormous amount of money to build the palace of Versailles, where he resided. Versailles was not just a representation of France’s wealth, but a place where nobles every year were ordered to live temporarily. By mandating that every noble was to live with the King in Versailles, the nobles power was neutralized. Louis now could watch over the nobles and take isolated them from their homes and people, which made it more difficult to rebel against the king. Peter, who was still working to develop his empire attempted to control the nobles by enforcing a tax on any noble who wished to have facial hair. By doing so, Peter hoped to emphasize his power of the nobles, and that the monarch determined how people were meant to live. By mandating this tax Peter also spread the idea of conformity within the empire, which is another device in controlling the people. To both Louis and Peter controlling the nobles was necessary, but the strategies in which they controlled them differed. (40 minutes)

The role of religion greatly affected both empires as well. Religion was used as a way to control and unify both empires. Louis, who belonged to the Roman Catholic Church, believed that he possessed the divine right to rule. He believed that God had chosen him to rule, and therefore if someone committed a crime against Louis, or the French government, they had sinned against God. His beliefs were projected to the people of France and influenced them as well. Peter was working solely on expanding his empire and working hard to make sure there was no revolt within the empire. For this reason, he was tolerant of religion and considered himself a “man of the people.” His relaxed views on religion caused no serious conflicts within the empire. Although each ruler had different views on religion, religion was still a large part of each empire. Louis strong Roman Catholic influence made the French Empire an extremely religious empire which engaged in many holy wars, whereas Peter’s tolerance made the Russian Empire more open to people believing in what they wanted. Even though each empire had opposing views on religion, religion still greatly affected each empire significantly.

Peter and Louis were both important rulers during the eighteenth century. While their large professional armies, necessity in controlling the nobles, and the large impact of religion on their empires was the same, the reason for their armies, the ways in which they controlled their nobles, and their differences in religion all differed. The changing times of Europe because of new technology, and advancements in finance contributed massively to these developments of these two principal empires.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    thus not being connected anyway to the area they ruled. Louis sought to unify France when it came to religion ? thus selecting one religion in which people in this area could believe in and practice. But, he was met with fierce opposition. Louis met this opposition with a large army and raging warfare in which many churches and schools were destroyed.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whap Chapter 18 Hrt

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Peter 1: Autocrat; Peter the Great; son of Alexis Romanov; ruled 1689 to 1725; included more definite interest in changing selected aspects of economy and the culture through imitation of western European models…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV believed that one king should have power and control over the country of France. To do this he reorganized the army and was exceptionally…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1673, Father Jacques Marquette, a Jesuit missionary, and Louis Joliet, a fur trader, undertook an expedition to explore the unsettled territory in North America from the Great Lakes region to the Gulf of Mexico for the colonial power of France. Leaving with several men in two bark canoes, Marquette and Joliet entered the Mississippi River and arrived in present-day Arkansas in June 1673. They were considered the first Europeans to come into contact with the Indians of east Arkansas since Hernando de Soto’s expedition in the 1540s. The goal given Marquette, Joliet, and their men was to document, for French and Canadian officials, an area that had been largely unknown until the late seventeenth century.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The early modern era marked an important watershed for the development of the modern state. Louis XVI of France and Fredrick the great elector of Brandenburg-Prussia are exemplars of an absolutist monarch, but the similarities and differences in their approach would have far-reaching consequences for Europe as a whole. The first important aspect of centralization was the consolidation of the military. Both Louis and Fredrick reformed and reorganized their armies, commissioning new weapons, uniforms and organizational systems, continuing the trend towards professionalization and expansion. There were differences in the degree of focus on the army – Frederick utilized more resources relative to those available to him; however, overall the method of reform for the army was similar for both these absolutist monarchs, whom wished…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV was the epitome of an absolute monarch. Through his endless wars, extreme extravagance, and absolute control over taxes and the economy, he set the example for other European powers. His absolute rule brought about both positives and negatives. By building a large army to defend and expand his borders, he alienated other empires and created enemies. Placing political power and faith in the nobility helped him rule a vast kingdom but displaced him from the common man. His obsession with being a great conqueror expanded France to its largest in history, but nearly bankrupted the country and resulted in losing more territory than he gained. Although Louis XIV brought many improvements to France, as well as western society, his insatiable lust for war and extravagance caused more harm than good to the French Empire.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both men, Frederick and Peter, possessed great military knowledge, and used that knowledge to defeat their opponents. Each brought his country from ruin, and placed it upon the top ranks of world powers. However, there are also many differences. For example, Frederick the Great focused more on physical actions, discipline, and honor, while Peter the great looked more to advancement in technology, education, and knowledge. Frederick the Great promoted religious freedom throughout all of Prussia. Russia however, under Peter the Great, was entirely devoted toward the Eastern Orthodox…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pre-revolutionary France was an absolutist state: the king of France, in the words of Louis XIV, was the state. However tradition and privileges were central in this system, giving authority to trades and guilds, judges and tax collectors, and the Church; furthermore, certain cities had individual exemptions and each province had privileges as well. To make these various – and often conflicting – arrangements more complicated, the government had limited organizational capacity when it came to travel and communications. The primary focuses of the government were military and foreign policy, and they paid for these through an extensive taxation system. By the end of the eighteenth century, the state was compromised by overwhelming fiscal burdens, mainly due to its repeated voluntary participation in foreign wars. Because the collection of taxes was not entirely under the control of the state, the government attempted to streamline the entire tax system, however this proved unsuccessful…

    • 2534 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic DBQ

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the development of history, Autocratic leaders have tried to authorize their people and country. Two such leaders are Czar Peter the Great and King Louis XIV. However, the process they’ve decided to pursue has either helped or hurt their countries. Czar Peter the Great declined in creating Russia’s firm middle class, but managed to succeed in the reinforcement of Russia’s great power. While Louis XIV agonized his country by regulating his people.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Period 4 Vocabulary

    • 989 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Match the term to the definition. To create a better review sheet, write the term instead of the letter.…

    • 989 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the 16th and 17th century Europe, political views on the government varied in Europe. After the Catholic Church’s downfall, absolute monarchs dominated Europe. An analysis of the documents clearly shows that mostly kings favored absolutism and have superiority over their people. On the other hand, some viewed absolutism as a power that made people inferior to the government.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What form of government was most effective-democracy or absolutism- for the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in Europe?…

    • 967 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis the XIV

    • 990 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Louis the XIV was king of France from 1693 to 1715. He was an example of how to rule for many of the political leaders of the 18th century. An absolute ruler is defined by seven traits. Pacify and subjugate nobles, and centralize power around oneself. Another is to make both money and war. Dominate culture, make religion and finally build something worthy of your glory. Two Enlightened despots that took after Louis were Joseph II of Austria and Peter the Great, Czar of Russia. Both rulers had enlightened and despotic characteristics. Yet Joseph was more Enlightened and Peter more despotic. Both characteristics were important to have a strong nation, but as Peter exemplifies having more despotic characteristics helps a ruler maintain power and strengthen the nation, more so then enlightened ones. Joseph II takes full power in 1780 after his mother Maria Theresa dies, instantly he begins to institute many enlightened ideas. Joseph is radical and makes many changes to long withstanding traditions in Austrian society and government. First, he grants religious freedom and cuts off communication between his state clergy and Rome. Though Austria had always been staunchly Catholic, now a person of any religion could practice it freely. This is a very enlightened idea much before its time. Also, it was one of his only major changes which were kept after his reign ended. This was how Joseph II fits under the trait of making religion work for you; he actually tried to make it work for everyone. Another enlightened reform he implemented was a universal law code in which all Austrians have to follow the same rules and suffer the same punishments. He eliminates noble privileges, in matters like taxation, and crimes. This reform angered the nobility and almost put the nation in crisis. But it was one last reform which set off a spark of rebellion. Joseph II outlawed serfdom, he freed millions of peasants. They were free to go wherever, and choose…

    • 990 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The late 1700's were a period of great social and political revolution in Western civilization. The French Revolution was a major part of this sweeping change in the way Europeans (and the newborn Americans) perceived the function of government and the most effective ways of governing. The French Revolution had many long term and short term causes and effects, and was one of the most violent periods in the history of the country. There were many factors that contributed to the spark of the revolution. There were three main causes of the French Revolution: gross mishandling of governing duties and incompetence in the leadership of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, the large and very unjust social and economic gap between the first two privileged estates and the poor third estate, and finally the revolutionary ideas of the enlightenment and their influence on the philosophies of the people.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays