“When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease—of joy that kills.”…
Would you feel empathetic towards a mentally unstable man? A man whose actions were a result of his life’s incomplete lessons?…
In the article “Serial Killers do we know enough to catch them?” Sarah Glazer gives an overview about the past history and the knowledge on serial killers. Glazer explains how serial killing has been on the rise. She states “The FBI popularized the notion of the “serial” murderer and contended the phenomenon was increasing in the 1980s, during a wave of child kidnapping and serial murders” (Paragraph two). For example, serial killers numbers of victims started to hit the thousand ranges and the numbers kept rising. She stated “The implication at the time was that these were senseless murders with no apparent motive, and thus likely to be the work of a serial killer” (Paragraph two). Since the 1960’s these killings were rising and by time it hit the 80’s, the numbers doubled. Less than 70 percent of murders are being solved now and days but compared to the 60’s, there was a 90 percent chance of them being solved. Glazer quotes FBI agent John E. Douglas who helped start the behavior unit “further point out that crime-solving techniques have become more…
The doctors told that her death was because she was so happy that she died, and it is sad that they got it completely wrong. None of them truly knew what was going on in Louise Mallard’s head before her death. She was filled with excitement about life and nobody was aware of the freedom she felt. It is hard to imagine a death where nobody truly knows about how someone feels.…
Lying on her deathbed , she contemplates that “She had spent so much time preparing for death there was no need for bringing it up again”(2). Even when approached with death she felt like she had to be in control of even the littlest thoughts. Her extreme propensity to control presents a psychological dependency; her urge to control may stem from the loss of her loved ones such as her husband John, her fiancé George, and her child Hapsy. The point of view changes occasionally switches to first person to emphasize the focus on Granny Weatherall’s desires and thoughts at specified time; for example in the middle of a description of George’s abandonment the author adds in, “No, I swear he never harmed me but in that.”(3). Because this information is directly from Granny’s perspective, it demonstrates her deepest thoughts: her need to convince herself that she is not hurt by the abandonment. She tries to suppress the unpleasant pain of the sudden abandonment in order to move on. Because she could not control the jilting by her fiancé, she instead tries to control her emotions not allowing herself to be hurt. To compensate for the unexpected…
Since the time I read them, they never came out of my mind, and they grabbed my attention since I read their titles. “The Penalty of Death” by Henry Louis Mencken and “Execution” by Anna Quindlen, are the essay that affected me the most from the River Reader book. Maybe because I thought about the death penalty before, or maybe because their words affected me and my way of thinking. The thing that I am sure about that both of the essay touched my emotions and feelings in a way that let me never forgot them among the other texts. I think that the reason behind that is that they are about a human case and something true that is happening in our world.…
Mallard in the story, which allows us to envisage the irony in the story. It starts on the substantial belief of “weak heart”, therefore,” Knowing that Mrs. Mallard was afflicted with a heart trouble, great care was taken to break to her as gently as possible the news of her husband's death.”(Choplin 1) But, till the readers reach the end the death of Louise brings out the irony in the story.” The Joy that kills” (Choplin 20) relates to her death because of sudden loss of independence she found a while ago. Mark Cunningham also debates on the similar theme that Louise’s death is caused by the shock of the new found…
In this story Eleanor Abbott kills her husband because she is angry that she has to take care of him for the next ten years because he can't walk, talk, or even think. “I have to put an end to the horror the doctors say is still alive, that terrible things I know is Gregory’s corpse” (Pachter 130). Eleanor kills her husband out of anger because she is keeping him alive when he is unable do anything. She is angry that she has to keep him alive for no reason.…
Deneau presents the question whether Louise is "a normal understandable, sympathetic woman or is she an egocentric, selfish monster." Even though celebrating the death of one 's husband is evil and devilish, the way she does it makes her a sympathetic character. Deneau explains that there is a spiritual force that is responsible for Louise 's emotions. He also argues that "if immediately…
She is successful but dies in the process. And that is what makes her story so tragic. She knew full well that she would be hurting her family and even sacrificing her very existence, but she knew that to secure her sense…
Lena Lingard intrigues me. She’s gentle even though she’s lived on the farm her entire life and she manages to make the littlest things exciting with her charisma. In ways, her adventurousness and excitement make her similar to Tony. However, they differ in that Ántonia possesses a quiet beauty and inner strength that contrasts with Lena’s liveliness. It’s strange-- I dream the same dream “a great many times, and it [is] always the same. I [am] in a harvest-field full of shocks, and I [am] lying against one of them. Lena Lingard [comes] across the stubble barefoot, in a short skirt, with a curved reaping-hook in her hand, and she [is] flushed like the dawn, with a kind of luminous rosiness all about her. She [sits] down beside me, [turns] to me with a soft sigh and said, ‘Now they are all gone, and I can kiss you as much as I like.’ I...wish I could have this flattering dream about Ántonia, but I never [do].” (109) I love Ántonia and her steady independence but I cannot see her in my dreams in…
Louise felt stuck in her marriage and had to maintain society’s standard. Her death to heart disease “the joy that kills” (Chopin, “Story Of An Hour”) explained that all the hope and dreams of becoming free was shattered upon the arrival of her husband. She depicts Louise Mallard’s emerging appreciation of what life would be by looking through a widow, which implies her mental and physical freedom in “The Story of an Hour.” In “The Awakening” Edna and Adele show different areas of feminism but patriotic society still influences their desires and life in general. Edna chooses to end her life instead of abiding by the norms. Edna suicide is a proof that she was not willing to compromise the freedom she wished to enjoy. Consequently, her steps…
Louise 's feelings observed through a third person view little by little divulge her story. She whispered: "free, free, free!" uncontrollably with "a monstrous joy." It is freedom that she has been battling to feel for the many years married to her man. She tried to defend herself by rambling on about how she used to love her husband sometimes, but she cannot hide the delighted actuality that she has her freedom back once again. To her the marriage was a prison; her life belonged to her husband with the social belief that such thing would make a woman 's life fulfilled. She releases all the stress and emotions that had been building up all the passing years. It is devastating, as she describes it, "her pulses beat fast, and the coursing blood…
The joy that killed Mrs. Mallard can be her tremendously exciting feelings when her husband reappeared before her eyes, completely unexpected. Deep down in her heart, she loved her husband though living with him made her depressed. The joy she felt with the freedom she found in her husband's death was clear, but no specific evidence pointed out that she absolutely…
The story of an hour describes several emotional stages that a woman undergoes after she learns about her husband’s death. The unexpected changes in her emotions lead the authors to view her differently as the story proceeds. Kate Chopin, the author of The Story of an hour, suggests that all human relationships, in this case the marriage, is oppressive, either intentionally or unintentionally, in its nature, and that the idea of freedom is forbidden, though people long for it. Her sophisticated characterization of Louise, along with her detailed explanation of Louise’ feelings, strengthens the author’s message. That Louise has a heart trouble is the first thing that the I learn about her.…