Preview

Love Has No Color

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
862 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Love Has No Color
Love Has No Color

Written by Stephanie Figueroa
Kingsborough Community College
Sociology 3100

Partners amongst interracial relationships have been experienced and full of content ever since the 1600s. From laws of abolishment to the percentage of young America whom take part in an interracial romance, this particular group of individuals who believe in miscegenation didn’t let anything nor anyone interfere with their right to love. The battle has ended but still raises eyebrows to some individuals who just can’t accept the fact of anyone marrying outside of their race till this very day. Even though it may seem wrong to some, their judgment can’t ever out-beat the amount of courage and pride a couple may share, the Loving vs. Virginia case is definitely the perfect example of a such couple. Romance amongst people outside of their races has been a point of happiness in the United Stated since the first English settlers established colonies in the seventeenth century. Maryland banned interracial marriage in 1664 due to inquiring of whether the child of a slave and a white individual would be considered a free person or property. Later on the states of Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and South Carolina decided on anti-miscegenation laws which banned interracial marriage. Virginia forbid interracial couples and their children would be considered as “that abominable mixture and spurious issue.” in 1691. When slavery was extinguished by the thirteenth amendment in 1865, many southern states established what were known as the “Black Codes.” These codes continued the restriction of marriage between whites and blacks. This was based on the commonly held an approach that Africans, and Native Americans as well, were subordinated races and incest would deprave the white gene pool. When Congress tried to override the “Black Codes” by issuing a series of laws from 1866 to 1875, the Supreme Court announced most of the legislation abandoned and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mildred Jeter, an African-American woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, went to Washington, D.C, to get married and avoid Virginia’s interracial marriage ban. When they returned to Virginia not long after, the Lovings were arrested under the charges of violating Virginia’s interracial marriage ban.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Loving v Virginia a married couple from Washington D.C. moved to Virginia where they were then subject to Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statute. Anti-miscegenation laws prohibit the marrying of different races with another. In Virginia, this statute prohibited the marriage between whites and any other race. Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, were married in Washington D.C. They then moved to the state of Virginia where they faced criminal charges. Both of them pled guilty and were sentenced to one year imprisonment but the sentence would be waved for 25 years if they moved out of state and didn’t return.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This would be a beautiful love story except for this couple was an interracial one and their home state of Virginia did not condone marriages between Caucasians and African-Americans. Yes, it was 1958 but the law had been in place since 1924. It didn’t matter that the couple, Mr. Richard Loving and Miss. Mildred Jeter, were legally married in Washington, DC. They returned eager to begin their life as one but was jailed. The state of Virginia upheld their law and the Lovings were sentenced to a years imprisonment. The nice judge suspended their time but they had to agree to leave Virginia and not return for 25 years. The Lovings family returned to Washington, DC but decided to visit family in Virginia. During this visit they were again arrested. During this time Mrs. Loving sought out assistance from the Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The odds there were not in his favor. Five of the nine justices were from slave-holding families. By this time, nearly a decade had passed since Scott first sought freedom through the courts. Along the way John Sanford of New York claimed he now owned the slaves, for reasons that have never been determined. Scott’s lawyers used an argument based on the fact the defendant, Sanford, and the plaintiff were from different states, shifting the focus of the case to whether the Supreme Court had jurisdiction and whether or not Scott was a citizen of the United States.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sollors, Werner, ed. Interracialism: Black-White Intermarriage in American History, Literature, and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.…

    • 3133 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiffs in Loving v. Virginia were Richard and Mildred Loving, who were represented by the ACLU in the Supreme Court. The Plaintiff argued the prohibition of interracial marriage was unconstitutional and anti-miscegenation laws violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment explains, “No State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law.” As declared by the Constitution and Maynard v. Hill case, marriage is a civil right for citizens of the United States and the decision of whether one decides to marry a colored person or not cannot be infringed by any state. Denying anyone their given right to marry without due process of the…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pa250 Unit 1

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Loving v. Virginia (388 US 1, 1967) was a landmark case, dealing with inter-racial marriage, which went all the way to the US Supreme Court. The plaintiffs, Mildred and Richard Loving, an inter-racial couple, who were residents of Virginia, where at the time it was illegal for people of different races to be married. They went to Washington D.C. in June of 1958 to get married, and returned back to live a married couple in Virginia. Upon their return to Caroline County, Virginia they were charged with violating the law. The couple was charged when police invaded their home in the middle of the night, hoping to witness the Loving’s involved in a sexual act which was also a crime at the time in Virginia. When Mrs. Loving showed the police the marriage certificate, the police charged the couple with violating Virginia § 20-50 which, “prohibited interracial couples from being married out of state and then returning to Virginia.” As well as, Virginia § 20-59 that made “miscegenation” a felony. Black’s Law defines miscegenation as, “A marriage between persons of different races, formally considered illegal in some jurisdictions. In 1967, the US Supreme Court held that laws banning…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This problem needed a solution, so Congress passed two more amendments. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery in the United States; however, it did not provide equality to black people and created new difficulties for the country to overcome. The southern states enacted Black Codes, which forbade owning land, moving freely through public spaces, and running a business. Congress reciprocated by adding more amendments to the…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reconstruction Dbq

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1865, Amendment Thirteen of the United States was ratified. The article states that all slaves residing in the nation or any of its corresponding territories are deemed emancipated. (Document A) Though the article does publicly mandate emancipation, it fails in successfully granting freedom to previous slaves. Southern states imposed “black codes” upon the newly freedmen. These diminishing codes restricted various activities and behaviors of the black community. Many included the prevention of interracial marriage, black testaments against whites in court of law, and jobs outside of agriculture. Clearly, the Thirteenth Amendment was not strictly imposed upon the once rebellious southern states. Three years later, congress decided to enact another article that would annul the previously mandated Dred Scott Decision of 1957, which states that blacks could not be legal citizens. This newly established document was titled the Fourteenth Amendment. The amendment itself stated that all persons born or naturalized in the…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia Essay

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In June of 1958, Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving married in the District of Columbia. They were residents of Virginia but due to Virginia’s laws they weren’t able to marry within their state. The state of Virginia prevented marriages based on racial classification. After the couple married they returned to their home state in Caroline County where they were then charged for violating Virginia’s ban on interracial marriages. The Loving’s went to court and was sentenced to a year in jail. However, the judge suspended the trial for twenty-five years on the condition that the Loving’s wouldn’t return to Virginia for those twenty-five years.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the 1600s black and white people related to each other by the first African indentured servants arrived in the Virginia Colony of the United States of America in 1619. They were indentured servants and not slaves because the Spanish had baptized them and the English believed that baptized people could not be enslaved. This era was truly the beginning of white opinions dominating Black lives across continents. However, blacks and white worked side by side, married each other freely, ran away from their masters together and even rose up against the rich together, guns were drawn. Blacks had the same rights as whites of the same social status. From 1640 to 1723 the American colonies, particularly in the South, passed laws that ate away…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Art is an expressive outlet for people to be able to get an important point across. That could either be affected by social/political issues taking place at the time or their personal experiences. These events and experiences have led to the breakthrough of many texts. Langston Hughes, the author of poems, Mother to Son and Let America be America again captures the Harlem Renaissance period, which was a social and artistic revival of the African American community. His poems explore the themes of stereotyping and taking action. John Lee Hancock also reinforces these themes through his moving film The Blind Side. The social contexts in which these texts were made help the public dive into and have an understanding of these events.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving V. Virginia

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Loving v. Virginia tells me in this case that the Constitution of the United States then were unfair and unjust to the Loving Family. Here we have two people of different race, obviously in love and married. Although the state of Virginia had its own objective concerning interracial marriages, I feel that our Constitution should have enforced what laws were emplaced within The Constitution of the United States. That’s why they were written to protect and to keep good law and order.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Loving v. Virginia case wasn’t ever just a political case. It was a social class segregation that began from early on that people made law. Jim Crow Laws and many other laws, including one denying interracial relationships, was a way of suppressing a certain group of people from living the same as everyone else. This fight was one for equality and love, and those two things have been and will forever have relevance until there is total equality for all people. They had their “happy ending” where they were able to be together without…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This certain law states, “The marriage of a white person with a negro or mulatto or person who shall have one-eighth or more of negro blood, shall be unlawful and void.” (Mississippi Martin Luther King Jr. National History Society SpringBoard book 197). This law is saying, when stripped down to its most basic form, that if a person who pertains to any colored race were to marry a Caucasian, their marriage would be null and void. Essentially, even if two American citizens fell in love with each other and wanted their marriage to be blessed, they would never legally belong to one another in the face of the government, which can be devastating depending on how religiously or romantically involved the interracial couple is. By confiscating the rights of colored races, the Jim Crow laws have also forced those who are white to either give up the things they love in order to conform to civilization, or to sacrifice their privileges in order to join a band of socially unequal…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays