Preview

Loving Vs Virginia Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
189 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Loving Vs Virginia Case Study
Loving v. Virginia (1967)
Issue: Interracial marriage
Bottom Line: You can’t marry anyone outside your own race

Backround
Mildred Jeter, an African-American woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, went to Washington, D.C, to get married and avoid Virginia’s interracial marriage ban. When they returned to Virginia not long after, the Lovings were arrested under the charges of violating Virginia’s interracial marriage ban.

Ruling
The Lovings pleaded guilty, and were sentenced to one year in jail. However, the trial judge agreed to suspend their sentence for 25 year if they leave Virginia and don’t come back together for 25 years. So the Lovings left the state. Later, the Lovings appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals that their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The case Heien v. North Carolina came about on April 29, 2010 when an officer started “following a suspicious vehicle, Sergeant Matt Darisse noticed that only one of the vehicle's brake lights was working and pulled the driver over. While issuing a warning ticket for the broken brake light, Darisse became suspicious of the actions of the two occupants and their answers to his questions. Petitioner Nicholas Brady Heien, the car's owner, gave Darisse consent to search the vehicle. Darisse found cocaine, and Heien was arrested and charged with attempted trafficking.” After denial of his motion to suppress, defendant entered a guilty plea in the North Carolina Superior Court… the North Carolina Court of Appeals reversed…The North…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sean O’Grady, a professional boxer, was managed by his father, Pat. Sean was a contender for the world featherweight title. Pat entered into a contract with Magna Verde Corporation, an LA based business, to co-promote a fight between Sean and the current world featherweight champion. The fight was scheduled to take place in Oklahoma City. To promote the fight, Pat set up a press conference. At the conference, Pat was involved in a confrontation with a sportswriter named Brooks.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: The Second Bank of the United States was chartered in 1816, amid much opposition from the states. However, following many financial disasters throughout the nation, eight states, including Maryland, passed statutes restricting the “activities of the Bank or imposing heavy burdens on it.” The state of Maryland impeded the operations of the Bank by imposing a significant paper tax on all notes not chartered by the state. McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the Bank brought the case to the trial court which decided against him. The Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed this decision.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the case of Hampton v. Snead State Community College (SSCC), the one element that Hampton failed to establish of a prima facie case of racial discrimination was the forth element in the case. The forth element in the case stated, “SSCC treated similarly situated employees outside of Hampton's protected class more favorably” (Hampton). According to the court, Hampton failed to establish the prima facie case of bring substantial evidence of employees of another race who were tried fairly. The plaintiff brought evidence of three colleagues, also coaches, who were White (Adam Rhoden, Steve Machen, and Gerry Ledbetter) who engaged in misconduct and were not demoted or transferred to another division. However, the first two coaches that Hampton supplied, as evidence to the court did not suffice because both coaches, Rhoden and Machen, incident involved another athletic director than whom the plaintiff was suing. The third coach involved in the evidence, Coach Ledbetter, was also deemed an insufficient example because Ledbetter’s misconduct was different than that of the plaintiff. Therefore, since the plaintiff was not able to cover the final element of a prima facie case of racial discrimination, the plaintiff request of summary judgment was denied.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1920s, American stardom was on the rise. With the birth of the movie “star”, the public was more focused than ever on Hollywood. The crowds rejoiced when actors and actresses made blockbuster movies, but came down with harsh criticism if this perfect image was shattered. This is evident in the case of Virginia Rappe, a popular silent film actress who died in the days following a party with the biggest star at the time, Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle. The case was based on the assumption that her death, caused by a ruptured bladder, was due to being raped by Arbuckle. This case was filled with many conflicting testimonies along with the influence of the press making the persecution of Arbuckle impossible.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Virginia on April 7th 2003 a divided United States Supreme Court opened the possibility of constitutionally restricting certain types of hate speech. The court was to hear a case that spoke to one specific Virginia state statute that prohibited cross burning with the intent to intimidate, and also rendered that any such burning shall be prima facie evidence of an intent to intimidate a person or group. This court would see this statute being used between two separate cases. The first case was against Barry Black; in August of 1998 Black led a Ku Klux Klan rally at which the conclusion resulted in the burning of a cross on private property with the permission of the owner. Black was charged under the state statute, “Burning a cross with the intent to intimidate.” [347] The jury was instructed in accordance with the Model Jury Instruction that the burning of the cross by itself is sufficient evidence from which you may infer the required intent. [364] In May 1998 Richard Elliot and Jonathan O’Mara attempted to burn a cross on the lawn of Elliot’s neighbor and were charged in accordance under the cross-burning statute. After all of the respondents were convicted, they appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia arguing that the cross-burning statute is unconstitutional. The Virginia Supreme court reversed all the convictions holding that the Virginia cross-burning statute is analytically indistinguishable from the ordinance found…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many ways, the opinion in this case represents a final step in the creation of…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Gregg argues that capital punishment is cruel and unusual, so it violates his constitutional rights protected under the Eighth Amendment. In 1972 the U.S, Supreme Court ruled in Furman v. Georgia, that the death penalty couldn’t be used in an arbitrary manner, in any state.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Loving Case Summary

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Loving case was based off of Richard and Mildred Loving’s marriage. Richard Perry Loving, a white construction worker, was born on October 29, 1933 in Central Point, Caroline County. Mildred Dolores Jeter, a mixed African American and Indian woman, was born on July 22, 1939 who was also born in Central Point, Caroline County. In the state of Virginia, the location in which they both had lived, there was a law called the Racial Integrity Act (“American...”). The Act restricted anyone of the opposite race to marry one another. According to Phyl Newbeck and Brendan Wolfe, Mildred and Richard when out of state to Washington D.C. to escape the marital restrictions back in Virginia. They were legally married on June 2, 1958. The couple lived…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late 18th century, political and social disagreements between the American colonies and Britain led to the most significant event in American History, the American Revolution. The American Revolutionary War lasted from 1775 to 1783. It is the reason as to why we became the United States. The original thirteen colonies did not agree with the Parliament of Great Britain governing them without representation so they rejected and expelled royal officials and Provincial Congress. Two major political parties formed the Federalists and the Republicans. These two parties were always at great competition with each other to gain public popularity. At the same time tension started between the United States and France and an undeclared war was ensuing with France. These were the two causes that led to the administration of John Adams passing out the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1978. There were four acts in total, the first three were regarding the rights of immigrant. The Sedition Act however, was perhaps the most controversial. It was deemed unconstitutional because it violated the right of speech and allowed the prosecution of anyone who voiced or printed their opinions if it went against the government or the president of the United States. In response to the Sedition Act Thomas Jefferson drafted the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and James Madison drafted the Virginia Resolutions of 1798 with the help of Thomas Jefferson.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In today’s society, interracial couples are seen differently than they were seen twenty years ago. In “Seek Success: Marry Someone like yourself,” an article by Sue Richardson in The Dallas Morning News published, March 14, 1993, describes her attitude towards interracial couples and how she feels “horrified” and “terrified”. In her article, Richardson’s purpose is both to persuade couples not to marry into interracial unions and to criticizing those who do. She is persuading her readers that they shouldn’t engage in interracial marriage because there are “too-many differences,” that it wouldn’t work out. She does this by using a critical tone.…

    • 305 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Loving and Mildred Jeter were both born and raised in Virginia. Mildred was African American, and Richard was Caucasian. On June 2, 1958 they decided to get married in Washington D.C., yet under the Virginia law. People did not approve of this decision because of their race. During the time of their case, integration was not completely accepted by others. Of course they were severely judged and put down, and the couple was bashed on by most of the surrounding people. They stuck through the battle though because they truly loved each other, and few people understood that, as anyone could conclude from the interviews within the documentary. Since their marriage was not legally accepted, they…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This certain law states, “The marriage of a white person with a negro or mulatto or person who shall have one-eighth or more of negro blood, shall be unlawful and void.” (Mississippi Martin Luther King Jr. National History Society SpringBoard book 197). This law is saying, when stripped down to its most basic form, that if a person who pertains to any colored race were to marry a Caucasian, their marriage would be null and void. Essentially, even if two American citizens fell in love with each other and wanted their marriage to be blessed, they would never legally belong to one another in the face of the government, which can be devastating depending on how religiously or romantically involved the interracial couple is. By confiscating the rights of colored races, the Jim Crow laws have also forced those who are white to either give up the things they love in order to conform to civilization, or to sacrifice their privileges in order to join a band of socially unequal…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Virginia Debate

    • 3382 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Jonathan Elliott, 3 Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Federal Constitution as Recommended by the Convention at Philadelphia in 1787 (2d rev. 137 1891)…

    • 3382 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays