Preview

Machiavelli's Views On Human Nature

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
547 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli's Views On Human Nature
Machiavelli’s views on human nature are unjust; nevertheless, his philosophy, or rather instructions, is reasonable in capturing the selfishness of men. As written in The Qualities of the Prince by Machiavelli, “Men are ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers, avoiders of danger, greedy for gain; and while you work for their good they are completely yours, offering you their blood, their property, their lives, and their sons… when danger is far away; but when it comes nearer to you they turn away.” Machiavelli’s generalization demonstrates his low opinion on the nature of men because he views them as selfish and lacking in both loyalty and honesty. Machiavelli’s general opinion that men are selfish contains an underlying truth to the human nature. Inside every human being, …show more content…
Brutus’s loyalty to his most trusted friend, Caesar, went astray when a problem arose among his Roman peers, and the betrayal was committed against Caesar which resulted in death. A lesson worth learning from this example is that a person’s loyalty can never be trusted unless it is proves to stand strong through any situations. As Machiavelli wrote, “a prince must be cautious in believing and in acting…”. His instructions for the prince stand true for almost everyone nowadays. Unlike disloyalty, dishonesty, according to Machiavelli, is an important factor in the relationship of all human beings. Machiavelli wrote, “princes who have accomplished great deeds are those who have cared little for keeping their promises and who have known how to manipulate the minds of men by shrewdness; and in the end they have surpassed those who laid their foundations upon honesty.” It is hard to imagine a society based on dishonest men. However, many great civilizations in the past have been built by ruthless men who ruled by being “a great hypocrite and a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the fourth paragraph, under the subtitle The Prince, Vincent Barnett states that Machiavelli refers to all men as “ungrateful, fickle, liars, and deceivers.” He also states that men were not loyal, but greedy and self absorbed. Machiavelli also wanted the “prince” to make himself feared, but not hated.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli – a diplomat exposed to decadent, cynical of the true nature of humanity, reflecting darker aspects of Humanism that man is essentially corrupt, self-serving and treacherous…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli asserts, “... of men generally; they are ungrateful, fickle, feigners and dissemblers, avoiders of danger, eager for gain” and that men are “treacherous and would not keep their promises to you.” Do you agree with his assessment of people? Explain.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Any choice that involves choosing either a friend or the greater good is a tricky one, to say the least. Making the best of it and taking the nobler path is what Brutus does in this situation, opting to sacrifice Caesar in return for the prolonged survival of the Roman Republic. While his ingenuousness is the reason behind his downfall, Brutus’ inner turmoil and his respectability…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus the betrayer

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus is a betrayer of Caesar’s trust, even though what he did seemed to be in the best interest of his country. He still betrayed Caesar’s trust by being disloyal and killing him. He took advantage of a position that he could have used to help the people through his influence; instead he used it to kill Caesar.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To give his advice structure, Machiavelli used an abundance of historical references. One leader he refers to is Francesco Sforza, Duke of Milan. Sforza fought and won power as a Duke, he passed that power on to his sons. His sons avoided war and lost power. This a great story to persuade the reader to think that the advice Machiavelli is giving should be taken. His message is that if a prince is not willing to fight, as Sforza's sons were not, they too may lose power. Machiavelli stresses the point that it is better to be feared than loved. A perfect comparison of the two sides is Hannibal and Scipio. Machiavelli…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli intended The Prince to serve as a guide to creating and holding on to a principality. In it, he also characterizes a "good" society and the necessary tools for building one. Although Machiavelli conceives the republic as being the most practical form of government, he reasons that it is still possible to create a good society under a monarchy, as long as the leader of the monarchy follows the stipulated guidelines. Machiavelli realized that humans are predisposed to act perniciously and therefore it is the responsibility of the prince to exploit that nature in a way that will benefit society as a whole. In this way, Machiavelli's prince is an ideal crafted from the actual, rather than an actual crafted from the ideal.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato, Machiavelli

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nicolo Machiavelli is known as being an realist who accepted that fact that humans are brutal, selfish, and fickle while Plato was an idealist who believed people could be ruled by a philosopher king who ruled over the warriors and tradesmen of his ideal republic with rationality. In his view the philosopher-king was in charge of making the state a "utopia" in that everyone had his/her place and all worked together for the common good of the state. Machiavelli said that this was a foolish idea. Machiavelli philosophy of government was centered on the ruler. He believed the king, or despot, had the right to do whatever was necessary for his own gain, or whatever the monarch considered the "good of the state" which he called Virtu’. Machiavelli believed the only purpose for a ruler was to make war, and protect its citizens from attacks by other states. He advocated the slaughter of surrendered generals in order to crush hopes of revolution - even rationalizing that it was worth the risk of revolution should it anger the people. Machiavelli believed a ruler should be immoral using deception and illusion for power and never allowing the people to know the “real” him…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, Brutus’s inflexible sense of honor made it easy for the conspirators to manipulate him. Brutus was very loyal to his close friends; however, when the future of Rome was taken into…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brutus is the complete opposite of Julius Caesar. He is too worried about what the common people of Rome will think of him. His honor is his strongest trait but also turns out to weaken him in the end. Brutus was arguably the most trustworthy and honorable man alive in Rome at this time. He always made his decisions on which would please the more people, not always on what was right. He trusted people way too much and they did not provide the same level of trust back to him. “not that I love Caesar less, but that I love Rome more.” This quote shows that brutus wanted to please the people of rome more than anything. In the end brutus’ honor kills…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Ceaser

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marcus Tullius Cicero once said “Nothing is more noble than fidelity. Faithfulness and truth are the most sacred excellences of the human mind.” Marcus is expressing that being loyal to someone was top priority in a relationship; he viewed it as a sacred act and a honorable trait for any human to have. I share a similar opinion in this regard; faithfulness, honesty and loyalty are the core components to any relationship, without any of these components a relationship cannot thrive. In Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare, the character Brutus was an ignoble friend. Brutus lacked loyalty and faithfulness to his friend Julius. His disloyalty moved him to turn his back against Julius and kill his best friend without any remorse. Brutus could never be honest with his wife Portia after the many requests made by her. Character Portia is portrayed with nobility. To prove her loyalty to her husband Brutus she stabbed her thigh with a knife to show him that she would rather suffer pain then to betray his trust.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    10th Grade Julius Caesar

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    he is most loyal to causes the entire population of Rome to riot. Brutus’ inability to not trust…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays