Preview

Mackinnon: What´s Economic Justice?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1879 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mackinnon: What´s Economic Justice?
Economic Justice, what is economic justice, and is it truly just? MacKinnon opens this chapter with a conversation between two people who have different views on the subject. One believes that wealthy citizens have a right to keep the wealth that they obtain; while the other believes that it is the responsibility of the wealthy to share their good fortune. This conversation raises the questions; what does society owe its citizens, and what do citizens owe society. One issue that is raised while discussing economic justice is income inequality. MacKinnon addresses this issue by pointing out that according to inequality.org the richest one percent of households now owns 34.3 percent of the nation’s private wealth. (MacKinnon p.283) She also …show more content…
This view holds that the way people obtain their wealth is not the only issue to be considered. Believers in this view think it is also important to look at the end results of the distribution and evaluate its fairness. Radical egalitarians believe that there is no just reason for one person to have greater wealth than another. Still they must pose the question; what should be equal, wealth and income, or satisfaction and welfare. Egalitarians point out that although a person may be wealthy it does not mean that the said person is happy, moreover; many people have little or no monetary wealth but are still quite happy. In other words “money can’t buy happiness”, therefore, we ask the question what is needed for a person to obtain happiness and can it be …show more content…
(MacKinnon p. 291) In order for this idea to work the people involved would have to be free from bias, in other words they must not be able to tip the scales in their favor by knowing their positions in life. Rawls points out that people consider liberty to be particularly important and would therefore choose a society that supported equal rights. However wealth is not as important and therefore it is easier to accept inequality in wealth so long as ones basic needs are met. Rawls believes that people would choose the society that better serves the poorest citizens and provides them with equal opportunity to obtain
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Fairness Approach: A Case Study
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    John Rawls Fairness Approach: A Case Study

    John Rawls’ Fairness Approach is an appropriate ethical framework to use when assessing this dilemma. This approach questions if everyone involved is being treated fairly (is there favoritism and discrimination?). The Fairness Approach examines how fairly or unfairly the actions of an individual or group distribute benefits and burdens everyone else. With this approach, consistency of treatment among persons is key. The only insistence when treatment must differ is if there is a morally relevant difference between people (Andre, Meyer, Shanks, Velasquez, 1989). There are three different kinds of justice -- Distributive, Restorative, and Compensatory. Distributive justice focuses on the benefits and burdens evenly distributed amongst society’s…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Where Ideologies Clash: Galbraith vs. Carnegie
    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Where Ideologies Clash: Galbraith vs. Carnegie

    All men are created equal – that is, unless you subscribe to Andrew Carnegies ideas put forth in the 1889 essay “The Gospel of Wealth.” Carnegie (2010) wrote that some people are “unworthy” while others are “the highest type of man, the best and most valuable of all that humanity has yet accomplished” (p. 395). Carnegie’s (2010) belief in social Darwinism and “survival of the fittest” (p. 393) seemed to convince him that because he had achieved wealth, he was the most fit or qualified to determine the best distribution for it. However, Carnegie’s ideas on wealth distribution do not address many societal problems, especially poverty. Poverty was better addressed by John Galbraith (2010), Harvard economics professor and John F. Kennedy advisor, who had differing views on wealth distribution (pp. 405-415). Because Galbraith had a more compassionate view toward all people, he would likely criticize Carnegie’s ideas on distribution of wealth and modify Carnegie’s investments in the public sector. Galbraith’s overall view was also more true to the gospel than Carnegie’s views as expressed in “The Gospel of Wealth.”…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pope Francis's Liberation Theoretical Analysis
    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pope Francis's Liberation Theoretical Analysis

    Modern economics have widened the gap between rich and poor in society. This gap can be illustrated by the fact that the three wealthiest individuals in the world have assets that exceed those of the poorest ten percent of the world’s population.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of On Bullsburg's On Inequality
    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of On Bullsburg's On Inequality

    This is a book that is really short, less than 100 pages, the page that was not even a full size to start. But it was worth reading. Simply stated, the author, a professor of philosophy at Princeton who previously wrote a popular book called On the bullshit roundly rejects the pursuit of economic equality as morally valid goal. He characterizes the pursuit as alienating a person of yourself, by defining…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Technique
    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Technique

    No one can argue that America is the country of the human rights and freedom and many people around the world dream to live in this great place. However, big problem is going to reshape the American society if nobody tried to solve it. The dilemma is simply that the rich got richer and the poor got poorer as a result of inequality of money distribution among rich and poor people.America had created a marvelous economic machine, but evidently it worked only for that at the top. Both Joseph E. Stieglitz and Timothy Noahintroduce a very critical issue which affects the American society in these days, is the widening gap between the rich and poor people. Stieglitz claims that the American economic system is failing for most of Americans and the inequality is increasing to the extent that one day will be unaffordable. The rising gap is created by the one top percent who are taking advantage of making a huge wealth. They are driven by their greed to accumulate big fortune upon poor’s shoulders. Stieglitz came up with some evidence to support his claim. One of these is the new statistics fromCensus Bureau’s statistics that shows that the one top percent gain 20 % of the total American income. Therefore, Noah says that this inequality income creates and retains the capitalism system which forms a serious threat upon middle and lower class (Noah The Great par 3).…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    'Income Inequality: Too Big To Ignore'
    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    'Income Inequality: Too Big To Ignore'

    In “Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore”, Frank shows the influences in Americans’ lives in different classes by the disparity between the rich and the poor. He arouses people’s consciousness for the “rising inequality” which is being polarized and has been causing immense damages to Americans, no matter which class they are. It is true that the “Income Inequality” in America is very obvious and affecting more and more people. Indeed, “we should just agree that it’s a bad thing”, however, are we able to do something concrete to deal with it effectively? Is the” rising inequality really required in the name of fairness”? I stand neutral towards Frank’s opinion.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Of Mice and Men Essay
    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Of Mice and Men Essay

    In any non-communist nation, there will always be people born with an advantage in life, and the way to equalize opportunity is not to distribute wealth into 7 billion pieces, the way to help those in need is through charity. In Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck……

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Race and Gender Wealth Gap, Karuna Jaggar
    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Race and Gender Wealth Gap, Karuna Jaggar

    The economic justice movement has historically focused on income equality. To the extent that attention was given to assets, the assumption was that once families’ incomes are not consumed with basic needs, asset accrual will follow. While some gains have been made in narrowing the earnings gap, today wealth inequality is higher in the United States than any other industrialized country: the wealthiest one percent own one-third of the nation’s wealth. As with all inequality, it is important to recognize the racial and gendered elements of the disparity. In the United States, families of color own just one-tenth of what white families own.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    wealth inequality in america
    • 1528 Words
    • 5 Pages

    wealth inequality in america

    In today’s capitalist economy, where economic transactions and business in general is centered on self-interest, there is a natural tendency for some people to make more than others. That is the basis for the “American Dream,” where people, if they worked hard, could make money proportional to their effort. However, what happens when this natural occurrence grows disproportional in its allocation of wealth within a society? The resulting issue becomes income inequality. Where a small portion of the population, own the majority of the wealth and the majority of the population own only a fraction of what the rich own. This prominent issue has always been the subject of social tension from even before the French Revolution and spawns numerous other social issues in a society. In the more recent Occupy Movement, beginning in 2011, protesters used income inequality as a motive. Moreover, they were justified in doing so. In a 2010 statistic, it was revealed that the top 1% of America, own 35% of the wealth while the lower 80%, over the majority of the population, only have 11% of the nation’s wealth distributed between them. Financially the situation is even worse where the bottom 80% own only 5% of the financial wealth and the top 1% own 42% of the Nation’s financial wealth. Not to say the top 1% didn’t work hard to get to where they are, but according to the ideals of the “American Dream,” the top 1% should have worked 243 times harder than the average, not the poorest, worker in America. This extreme of disproportional wealth distribution is not only a source of social conflict, but a catalyst for various other problems that exist.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Theory Of Justice
    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Rawls Theory Of Justice

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economic Justice For All
    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Economic Justice For All

    What the ideas and principles of the Economic Justice for All are not so much about how to shape the economic aspect of America but rather look at the social teachings in the church. The goal is to take what we have learned from gospel and make our everyday rational decisions about what is right and what is wrong. This is exactly what the Second Vatican of the Catholic Church did in 1986. A group of very intelligent priests and avid followers of Christ sat around together and addressed the right and wrongs of our economy as a whole; making each decision in the eyes of the Lord as best they could.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Income Inequality In America
    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Income Inequality In America

    Still to date, the problem of income inequality is an issue of a great importance for million of African-Americans and others who struggle to improve their quality of life. It must be known by now, that economic injustice has had a devastating impact on black communities all across America. Issues such as inequality and racial discrimination in education, the social environment, and economics have gone on for too long, and it has been engraved in the American society as a way of life, a norm, and permanently engraved in our mind, which implies that hope for a better change in the way of our lives ,was and still is given up. Income inequality has many implications on all of us: poverty,…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Injustice In America Today
    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Injustice In America Today

    In America today there is massive injustice in terms of income and wealth inequality. Injustice is rampant. We live in the wealthiest country in the history of the world but most Americans don’t know that because almost all of that wealth and income is going to the top one percent. We are living at a time where a handful of people have wealth beyond comprehension – huge yachts, jet planes, tens of billions of dollars, more money than they could spend in a thousand lifetimes. But at the same time, millions of people are struggling to feed their families or put a roof over their heads or find the money to go to a doctor.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Justice & Individualism
    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Social Justice & Individualism

    There are many differing views on the nature of justice. Some philosophers like John Locke and Frederich Nietzsche advocate the importance of individualism. However, John Stuart Mill strongly urges the vitality of concern for thy neighbor and the use of debate. Within each individual’s ideology I can see the positives. However, when it comes to the nature of justice I think the strong sense of personal goals in individualism and the allocation of debate in Mill’s ideals is what will bring the best for society.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rawl's Justice Is Fairness
    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rawl's Justice Is Fairness

    John Rawls never claimed to know the only way to start a society, but he did suggest a very sound and fair way to do so. He based his just scenario on two principles of justice. His first principle of justice was that everyone should have the same rights as others. His following policy decision was that in the event of any inequalities, they should be to the benefit to everybody, and available to all people in the society. This original Rawl's approach to justice has been highly revered by philosophers to this day. This is mostly because Rawl's has thought up one of the fairest Utopia since the days of Socrates. This is not an easy of a task as it sounds. Though when analyzed by even the most naïve philosophers, it seems that Rawl's scenario base of principles are pretty obvious and simple. Maybe because some of these same principles can be found in present day society. The United States tries to pride itself in maintaining these two principles at all costs. In some countries even regarding these principles as fair can cause you to go away for a very long time. The most commonly known to the term "political prisoner" is Gedhun Choekyi…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics