Barrack Obama wants companies to move their production back to America. In fact, he endorses insourcing and wants to make it easier for companies to bring back their jobs to America. But what can the manufacturers and government do to keep or increase the jobs in the United States of America? And what are the reasons for the current insourcing of jobs?
In 2012 Barrack Obama made a video endorsing American products. In the video he talks about how the country needs leaders and companies to start insourcing their production. In fact, he states that it will increase their bottom line and that it's the right thing to do for their workers. Furthermore, to increase insourcing, Obama wants to make tax reforms …show more content…
For example, a US company has insourced their production by using an automation system called Baxter. The robot does repetitive jobs and can work 24/7 resulting in an hourly cost of only 3$. You would think that the use of robots would result in fewer jobs, however the vice president of the company thinks otherwise. He argues that the robot increases jobs, because the need for higher skilled workers increases as they have to program these robots. Furthermore, he argues that the robot helps the workers, and that it wouldn't have been possible to insource without it. Therefore, the use of automation could be increasing jobs in the US by making it possible to insource at reasonable …show more content…
His ideas to streamline and reform the executive branch also makes sense, as he wants to make it easier for entrepreneurs and other small business owners to get help with patents and overseas trade, which should result in higher productivity. This makes sense, as more than 50% of the sold items in the US are produced outside the US. This would also make sense, as the insourcing has greatly helped to decrease the deficit in manufacturing trade which has been out of balance, because of the heavy