Preview

Maharaja Ranjit Singh: the Sikh Ruler, in the Eyes of Non-Sikhs

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Maharaja Ranjit Singh: the Sikh Ruler, in the Eyes of Non-Sikhs
According to the famous historian Carlyle, a worthy sovereign should be judged from a sole factor as to how he employs his sword after being victorious.
<br>
<br>**********
<br>Le Griffin writes that:
<br>
<br>"Maharaja Ranjit Singh ruled his kingdom exactly according to the Sikh way of life and Sikhism considers everyone as friends and talks about the welfare of all irrespective of caste and creed."
<br>
<br>**********
<br>
<br>The spirit of Gurbani couplet, "The one Lord is the Father of all and we are the children of the one Lord rules supreme in every Sikh heart." Charles Hugal, writes in his book, "Travels in Kashmir and Punjab", that, "probably no person in the world could have established such a large empire with minimum bloodshed as Ranjit Singh has established his kingdom."
<br>
<br>**********
<br>
<br>Affirming Hugal's views, Prinsep, also writes in his book, "Origin of Sikh Power in Punjab", that, "Ranjit Singh's whole career was free of any blemishes like unnecessary atrocities and cruel bloodshed."
<br>
<br>**********
<br>
<br>Historian R.S. Kanungo praising all the aspects of the Kingdom of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, in his writings says, "his empire was the kingdom for 'Welfare for All', in which all were equal sharing partners. In his kingdom there was no special love for Sikhs and no animosity for non-Sikhs. There were no special taxes on any caste to show it down from the other or to label it inferior."
<br>
<br>**********
<br>
<br>W.G. Osborne writes that, "Maharaja Ranjit Singh was so compassionate that outside a battle he did not kill anyone, so much so that in generosity he even forgave those who tried to kill him and felt happiness in forgiving."
<br>
<br>**********
<br>
<br>Charles Hugal in his book, "The Court and Camp of Ranjit Singh", writes that,
<br>"Ranjit Singh ruled his kingdom according to the Sikh tenets. All the important positions were given to Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs, entirely based on merit. Even his main advisors were three

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    R v Multani Law Factom

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gurbaj Singh, born in 19892, as being a devoted Sikh follower. Gurbaj believes that his…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Akbar strengthened his power by gaining the support of ___Rajput’s___? 12. What is Akbar’s attitude toward religion? He was tolerant of all religions 13. Who founded the Sikh religion?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sikhism- religion founded in Northern India by a holy man named Nanak, sought to blend Islamic and Hindu beliefs…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Akbar the Great – Babur’s grandson who was the greatest Mughal ruler. Although he was a Muslim, he gained the support of Hindus because of his tolerant policies.…

    • 4836 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Human Geo Exam

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    -Sikhism- is a religion that began in sixteenth century Northern India and locate primarily between India and Pakistan today. The principal belief in Sikhism is faith in Vāhigurū.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Safavid, Mughal, and Ottoman empires all depended in some way on the allegiance of non-Muslims to the empire. The Ottoman emperors were kinder on their conquered people, and the main separation between Muslims and non-Muslims in the empire was the tax on the dhimmis (non-Muslims). The Safavid leaders were more forceful in this regard. They imposed on subjects to convert to Islam unless they were an asset in trading with Europe. However, the leaders of the Mughal Empire, starting with Akbar, were far more just and understanding toward conquered people (mainly the Hindu population) in northern India.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of the Ottoman and Mughal Empire being tolerant of other beliefs, people of all religions living in the empire lived in peace. The Ottomans granted freedom of worship to other religious communities, mainly the Christians and Jews. They treated these communities as millets, or nations. The allowed each millet to follow its own religious laws and practices. This system kept conflict among people of the various religions to a minimum. In the Mughal Empire, Akbar the Great, who was leader at the time, ruled India with wisdom and tolerance. Being a Muslim himself, he allowed people of other religions to practice their own faiths.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sikhism is a monotheistic religion that split off of Hinduism. It believes in the one God. The book of Sikhism is the Guru Granth. It began and remains most prevalent religion in the Punjab region of India. It was started by Guru Nanak and combines the elements of Hinduism and Islam. They do not believe in the Caste System (like the Hindus), reject the idea of a pilgrimage to the Ganges, but do believe in reincarnation. The Sikh’s have to be ready at all times to do battle to defend their religion. They may carry the 5 K’s as the symbols of the religion.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Religion In The 1500s

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In India, religious tolerance was imperative in order for the Mughals to maintain any control in the majorly Hindu country. The Emperor, Akbar the Great, has been credited with cultivating the cohesion of the Muslim and Hinduism with his inclusive policies (S.M.Ikram p. 156). These policies included actions such as his effort to appoint many Hindus to high-ranking…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In both stories the author portrays a sense of horror to the reader. “The Fall of the House of Usher”, presents a creepier mood and is in the Gothic Literature genre. Gothic Literature is a genre that is represented by dark and gloomy mood. It is characterized by elements such as tortured characters, dramatic language, remote settings, and violence. “House Taken Over”, on the other hand presents a calmer mood through the actions of the characters and is in the genre of Magical Realism. Magical Realism is a genre that has more to do with fantasy than it does with fear. The differences between the two genres can explain the different attempts from the authors to portray fear to the reader.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world people believes in many different religions and call him different name but we all knows that there is only one god in world, who create the world and the destroyer. So there's one religions is Sikhism. Sikhs religions do not believe in double, but every religions and everyone's believes that praying daily and worships to the god is most important thing. Sikhism was founded more than 600 years ago. Today the Sikh religion have follower more than 30 million peoples all over the worldwide and Sikhism number fifth largest religion. Just like other religions Sikhism believes in worship and remember god at every moment. Sikhism has ten Guru who teach Sikh in Sikh holy book and living Guru Granth Sahib to respect and also equality with all people. Should not be no difference for any race, class, sex, and creed.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Opium War, the Taiping Rebellion, and the Indian Rebellion all had many issues with government, society, economy, and the citizens. Also, all three had leaders that wanted a change. The three wars and rebellions had a very large amount of deaths, damage to citizens, lack of money, and a forever memory of these horrible events. Leaders like Lin Zexu, Hong Xiuquan, and Guofan all demanded a change, whether it failed or not.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gandhi vs Genghis Khan

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In this paper, I will briefly analyze Mahatma Gandhi and Genghis Khan, their leadership skills, why they are important and how they brought the new orders into system and world politics. Both of them did so many sacrifies while doing these revolutions, they didn’t see their families so much as an example. The paper will focus on especially how they did achieve their success, what ways they did use while the process.…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although he had been exposed to hating Natives while in prison, he had loved equality between the earth and knew that everyone was equal. Gandhi had hated the idea of the phrase ‘the untouchables’. To him it really didn’t make much sense and just showed him how cruel the world can be at times. The untouchables were a group of people that were basically slaves for normal human beings. They were people that cleaned toilets for the rich. And homeless people who had no place in the world at the time. They were more of an it then a he/she, all of them were labelled the untouchables and didn’t have a whisper of voice for India. However, when Gandhi came along it all changed. As exampled above, Gandhi had a lot of respect for the untouchables and hated people who called them the two words; even when his wife said to clean the toilet – he insisted she did to show respect and show the public that Gandhi wasn’t a man who could spit words in public and make everyone clap. He had a…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is difficult to untangle this historical mess without scrutinizing the accusations against Aurangzeb rationally. Fortunately, in recent years quite a few Hindu historians have come out in the open disputing those allegations. For example, historian Babu Nagendranath Banerjee rejected the accusation of forced conversion of Hindus by Muslim rulers by stating that if that was their intention then in India today there would not be nearly four times as many Hindus compared to Muslims, despite the fact that Muslims had ruled for nearly a thousand years. Banerjee challenged the Hindu hypothesis that Aurangzeb was anti-Hindu by reasoning that if the latter were truly guilty of such bigotry, how could he appoint a Hindu as his military commander-in-chief? Surely, he could have afforded to appoint a competent Muslim general in that position. Banerjee further stated: “No one should accuse Aurangzeb of being communal minded. In his…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays