Man Vs State Profanity Analysis

Man Vs State: Profanity? Introducing two opposing forces, a Michigan man and the state of Michigan in a battle of upholding civil rights and a case of profanity. Stephanie Simon, author of the article, “Michigan Man Swears by His right to Use Profanity,” goes to on to discuss a case of man versus state. Simon writes for civil rights advocates explaining the two sides of the case involved with Timothy Boomer and Standish, Michigan. She included a casual tone within her work that was relatable and gave off a feeling of familiarity that allowed the readers to be more at ease. Furthermore, her explanation was strong as the article was resourceful, including multiple reliable sources within her work. Giving the impression this topic was well prepared and strong.
Simon explains this
She provided various opinions of an author, the local community, government officials, parents, and a universal law professor. Incorporating multiple sources allowed for a stronger writing. The strength of her writing comes from just that, the many sources. Another part of her article which strengthens her writing is that her gathered evidence include both sides of the case. For example, pro-Boomer, a UCLA law professor shares their opinion, while against Boomer, the local community’s opinions were also shared going against Boomer. Simon’s writing has included sources for both sides. The problem with a weak explanation is not present in her article because both sides are presented.
The explanation presented in the article is well done. Simon provided many opinions from different sources that strengthen her writing. A casual tone allowed civil rights advocates to ease into her explanation. But the article could be strengthened even further. If Simon provided more reliable evidence for both sides, instead of the opinions of many locals, then it would have been an even better