Changing role of the school principal
The techno century’s Leadership - From Principals to CEO (Chief Education Officer)
Abstract
The techno century’s principalship - From Principals to CEO (Chief Education Officer)
The role of the principal is multi-faceted. The techno century’s principalship in its epitomized role is about ensuring the relevance of aims, content, practices, and outcomes of formal education to digital generation. In accepting this coveted role, individual and organisational capability will be imperative, as will the development of individuals and communities to create and ‘walk’ the new paradigms. Modern school leadership also includes networking. School leaders will have to work together and share, rather than compete in their augmented roles. It will be essential that principals can not only advocate, but also implement, a win-win style of leadership, so that all give their absolute best. Principals must be involved in the design of curriculum and instruction. Principals must also take an active role in assessing the teaching that occurs in the school and, where needed, provide opportunity for teachers to improve their standards. Principals need to be able to lead in a less authoritarian style. They will need to develop within their schools a profound sense of social interest. Thus, if a principal is collegial, with a shared vision, yet still able to make the hard decisions, students and teachers will succeed and schools will become places of learning for all.
The techno century’s principalship –
From Principals to CEO (Chief Education Officer)
‘You can accomplish anything in life, provided that you do not mind who gets the credit.’
-Harry S. Truman
The role of school principal has always been very unambiguous to everybody- the principal and also to teachers, students and parents of the school. Writing in Creating the Future School, Beare concluded an uplifting chapter, about those who will head the school
References: Fullan, Michael (2003). The Moral Imperative of School Leadership, Corwen Press. Collins, Jim (2001). Good to Great, New York: Harper Collins. Hargreaves, David H, (2003). Education Epidemic: Transforming secondary schools through innovation networks, Demos. Beare, Hedley (2001), Creating the Future School. London: Falmer Press. Barth, R., 2001. Learning by Heart. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Beare, H. (2001). Creating the Future School. London: Routledge, Falmer. Cullen, J. (1999). ‘Socially Constructed Learning: A Commentary on the Concept of the Learning Organisation’ . In The Learning Organization 6, no. 1, pp. 45-52. Duignan, P. and Marks, W. (2003). From Competencies to Capabilities; Developing Shared Leadership in Schools. Duignan, P. and Spry, G. (2004). Developing a leadership framework and leadership capabilities for techno century Schools Fenwick, T Heifetz, R. A., and Laurie, D. L. (1997). ‘The work of leadership’. In H arvard Business Review, 75 (1), 124-134. Lakomski, G. (1995). ‘Leading and Learning: From Transformational Leadership to Organisational Learning’. In Leading and Managing 1(3), 211-225. Limerick, D., Cunnington, B., and Crowther, F. (1998). Managing the New Organisation: Collaboration and Sustainability in the Post-Corporate World (2nd ed.). Sydney: Business and Professional Publishing. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners. Free Press: New York and Toronto. Senge P. (1997). ‘Communities of Leaders and Learners’ . In Harvard Business Review, September-October. Stephenson, J. (1992). ‘Capability and quality in higher education’, in Stephenson, J and Weil, S. (eds) Quality in Learning: A capability approach in higher education, London: Kogan Page (Chapter 1).