Preview

Mandatory Minimums In The 1970's

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mandatory Minimums In The 1970's
Between the 1960s into the 1980s, a significant increase in the number of violent crimes occurred. During the 1960s the violent crime rate had risen by 126 percent and in the 1970s the rate had increased 64 percent. President Nixon attributed this to the usage of drugs and in 1971 addressed congress with the intent to provide the money to help eliminate drug abuse. With the monetary aid, the government created strict policies to crack down on drug abusers, policies still in effect today. The current policies addressing the sentencing of nonviolent drug users are ineffective and revisions to the policies should occur. The mandatory minimums sentences, low risk of violence, accompanied by no economic benefits provide clear reasons why …show more content…
Nixon also made drug related crimes federal offenses. Convictions for mere possession resulted in felony prison sentences and more serious crimes like dealing or trafficking came with even longer sentences. However, the longer sentences imposed to lower crime had insubstantial effect on arrest rates and did not deter recidivism. Minimum sentences directed toward drug users developed as a result of Nixon’s initiative to significantly reduce crime rates by incarcerating drugs users. This initiative, coined by Nixon as the “War on Drugs,” failed its main purpose of eliminating drug use and significantly reducing the number of drug users. During Ronald Reagan’s presidency in 1987, drug arrests accounted for 7.4 percent of the total of all arrests reported to the FBI and by 2007, drug arrests had risen to 13.0 percent of all arrests. Also, the incarceration rates for drug related crimes disproportionally affects minorities, especially African Americans. According to E. Ann Carson, a statistician for the United States Department of Justice, the number of African Americans imprisoned on December 31, 2013 consisted of almost 3% of African American male U.S. residents of all ages, compared to 0.5% of white

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Congress and the Reagan administration did not stop there, 1984 continued to see legislation pertaining to illegal drugs. The Aviation Drug Trafficking Control Act was passed which would require Federal Aviation Association administrators…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sirin writes that her article “investigates presidential progress in addressing racial injustices and disparities within the context of the war on drugs” and argues that the possibility for racial justice depends on a progressive president choosing its pursuit as a personal agenda. Sirin examines the drug policies of presidents from Richard Nixon to Barack Obama, and when discussing President Reagan, she gives him responsibility for the “punitive policies that disproportionately affected certain racial/ethnic groups” found in the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. She underscores his advocacy for federal mandatory minimum sentences, which created “the notorious 100 to 1 provision” under which five grams of crack cocaine carried the same prison sentence, five years, as 500 grams of powder cocaine. After explaining that crack cocaine users were typically poor and black, she notes that the resulting racial disparity in sentencing stayed in place until President Obama’s Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. Sirin clarifies that a progressive president will struggle without the legislature, judiciary, or public opinion, but she still holds that “most importantly, the president in office should have a progressive agenda to begin with in order to initiate and work towards key structural changes and policy reforms.” For this reason, according to her estimation, the president defines drug…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, he takes a different approach to regarding the War on Drugs. While he feels that current drug policies have failed, his book focuses on the injustice of punitive drug laws and believes we should stop punishing people for using illicit drugs. “A law whose purpose is deterrence must always be backed by a demonstration that the law is just.” (ix) His book is presented in three chapters. Chapter one describes our present drug policies and laws and raises questions to answer whether these are just or unjust and offers his position of decriminalization as a more ethical approach to drug use. Chapter two reviews the most frequent arguments used in favor of punishing drug users and Husak believes that none of these are convincing enough to warrant enacting laws on a person’s behavior. Chapter three declares that punishing drug users is counterproductive and damaging to us…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the contributing factors of why blacks are more than likely to be sentenced a harsher sentence than whites is because of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 by President Ronald Regan on October 27, 1986. The act mandated a minimum five year sentence without a possibility of parole if the offender was in possession of five or more grams of crack and if in possession of five hundred grams of powder cocaine. Many supporters of the act argued that that crack offenders needed harsher sentences because the drug was highly addictive and is more associated with violent crimes (United States Sentencing Commission, 2010). This act was extremely troublesome for African Americans because eighty-five percent of crack offenders are African American while…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ronald Reagan, 40th president of the United States of America, will always be remembered for his dedication to moral obligations and his distinct policy making style. In addition to having been a decorated thespian, Reagan was a politician with a strong commitment to conservative values. He inherited the white house at a tumultous time; the Cold War was at a new peak and the United States was facing a new evil – drugs. Reagan took a full, hardline stance against the drug problem in America. However, considering currently escalating crime and drug prevelance rates, did he ultimately have a positive impact on the drug situation in America?…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Domestic incarceration rate skyrocketed during Nixon’s presidency in 1971 when he declared the “War on Drug,” specifically targeting African Americans and Latino populations. Nixon himself along with other politicians such as Barry Goldwater and Nelson Rockefeller called “for harsh drug laws and severe criminal sanctions because they argued that a strong correlation existed between drug addictions and crime” (Cummings 418). Claims made by Nixon and other politicians became the focal point in the legislative branch in the 1970s, dismissing drug addiction as a public health issue rather than a criminal enterprise. During this time, Nixon established the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), which criminalized drug addiction and distribution. When Ronald Reagan took office, he criminalized drug addiction by passing the Anti-Drug Abuse Act in 1968; consequently, mass incarceration of nonviolent drug offenders from minority population took place in which sixty-five percent are African Americans and Latinos.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Courts Case Study

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Early efforts to meet the nation’s growing drug problem began in the 1970s. The U.S imposed stricter penalties for drug-related crimes, but was met with…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War on Drugs was proclaimed by the Nixon Administration in the signing of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. It evoked the current era of mandatory minimum sentencing, systematic racism, and mass incarceration of colored people. While the War on Drugs has certainly sought to eradicate controlled substances and destroy the networks established for their distribution, State efforts to control drugs are also a way for dominant groups to express racial power. Despite the socioeconomic factors that contribute to drug use, it is evident that drug legislation is inherently biased and fuels racially motivated mass incarceration.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history associated with drug criminalization in America contains more political motivators than concerns for public health and safety. The biggest politically motivated aspect to drug deterrence comes from Richard Nixon’s s war on drugs in 1971 which has created a system that discriminates against minority groups and has had little effect on deterring drug use. The war on drugs has thus far been notoriously noted for discriminating against people of color by pumping drugs into their communities and then imposing severe criminal consequences for drug possession, use, or distribution. In fact, one of Nixon’s aides John Ehrlichmen stated that the war on drugs was intended for the following:…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Race Prison Case Study

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1996, 59.6% of prisoners were drug-related criminals. U.S. population grew by about +25% from 1980 to 2000. In that same 20 year time period, U.S. prison population tripled. To make room in prison for incoming drug users and dealers, all inmates, including violent criminals are having their sentences shortened or are being paroled early” (Drug Laws). As one can see the use of drugs among Americans is shortening the sentences of violent criminals to make room for drug users and dealers. This matter will decrease if we begin to intervene in the home, next, the schools, and last but not least the individual…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war on drugs continued from the Nixon administration through the Bush administration, and supposedly was effective in lowering criminal activity rates in the United States. However, during the Reagan administration, the war on drugs may not have been necessary to implement. Activi"at the time President Reagan declared his war on drugs in 1982, drug crime was on the decline. It was not on the rise, and less than 3 percent of the American population identified drugs as the nation’s most pressing concern.” (Alexander).…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mass incarceration is often cited as one of the main pillars of institutional racism in America due to the disproportional amount of minorities incarcerated yearly. The war on drugs is widely acknowledged as one of the main reasons for mass incarceration and its devastating effects on the black community. On June 17, 1971, Richard Nixon officially declared drugs “America's public enemy number one” and thus began the colloquialized War on Drugs (Alexander 16). Seeing as Nixon’s presidency shortly succeeded the Civil Rights Act, Nixon exploited the raw frustration of the remaining segregationists in his campaign for the presidency. Years later, Reagan took office and his supposed drive to “crack down on crime” had an implicit focus on black communities…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prison population and the incarceration rate both increased in the mid 1970s largely due to violent and property crimes and drug policies would thereby have little effect. Drug offenders only made up about a quarter of the prison population while violent offenders made up half of the prison population. In general only about 17 percent of prisoners are serving time for drug related offences, which is only about 22 percent of the prisons growth (Bradley, 2016). James Forman Jr. explains how the prisons began to grow after street crime quadrupled from 1959 and 1971 and homicide doubled between 1963 and 1974 as robbery tripled. In the 1960s black Harlem residents wanted more police officers in their neighborhoods and many black advocates supported minimum sentencing, especially drug offenders. (Forman, 2012). In 2006, 50 percent were in prison for violent offences, 21 percent for property offences, and 20 percent for drug crimes, consequently violent criminals constitute the majority of the prisoners and not drug offenders (Bradley, 2016). Forman concludes that even if every prisoner who committed drug related offences were released, the United States would still have the largest incarceration rate in the…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “In 1980, drug offenders accounted for 25 percent of the inmates in federal prison; today they account for almost 60 percent.” (Gaines & Miller 2006 pg. 316 ). For example,…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During former President Ronald Reagan’s term, there was a seven hundred and ninety percent increase in prisoners according to the video provided for this essay. The gigantic increase can be contributed mainly to unlawful marijuana possession. Drug offenses are the leading cause of imprisonment in America. Among drug arrests, marijuana possession is the majority cause. Huffington Post claims, “27.6 percent of drug offenders were locked up for crimes related to marijuana.”(huffingtonpost.com) The Bureau of Justice Statistics generated reports concerning arrests related to illicit drugs, particularly marijuana, and they speculated decriminalization of such drugs would save American taxpayers billions, as well as reduce the prison population by millions.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays