Preview

Reasons For Mass Incarceration

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1988 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reasons For Mass Incarceration
Mass incarceration is often cited as one of the main pillars of institutional racism in America due to the disproportional amount of minorities incarcerated yearly. The war on drugs is widely acknowledged as one of the main reasons for mass incarceration and its devastating effects on the black community. On June 17, 1971, Richard Nixon officially declared drugs “America's public enemy number one” and thus began the colloquialized War on Drugs (Alexander 16). Seeing as Nixon’s presidency shortly succeeded the Civil Rights Act, Nixon exploited the raw frustration of the remaining segregationists in his campaign for the presidency. Years later, Reagan took office and his supposed drive to “crack down on crime” had an implicit focus on black communities …show more content…
As a consequence of the drug war, many fathers are being taken away from their families for non-violent, drug-related crimes and even after release, because they carry the “convict tag”, they find it very difficult to reintegrate into society (Alexander 250). Studies have repeatedly shown that children raised by single mothers have a higher chance of being expelled from school, get worse grades, are worse off financially, and have a higher chance of drug use (Debell 428). The absence of fathers is especially a big issue in African American communities that have been struck by the war on drugs, as a "black child born in 1990 is much less likely to be raised by both parents than a black child born during slavery" (Cherlin 110). Black children born in urban areas are at a statistical disadvantage before even being born due to the mass incarceration of people of color. Particularly in the major cities, “many poor people of color live in conditions of concentrated poverty and unemployment that predict the breakdown of community social processes, which in turn produce crime,” (Fagan and Meares 188). “The overwhelmingly poor communities in which many poor African Americans live are marked by unemployment, family disruption, and residential instability,” (Fagan and Meares 188). The living conditions that have been exacerbated by the war on drugs encourage even more crime and recidivism. The “get tough on crime” mentality that was created to discourage crime has, evidently, created conditions that foster even more crime and drug use. Even after being released from prison, it’s virtually impossible to find a job specifically due to the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 and various other policies. The act mentioned above prohibits the federal government from awarding grants to businesses that don’t

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Sirin writes that her article “investigates presidential progress in addressing racial injustices and disparities within the context of the war on drugs” and argues that the possibility for racial justice depends on a progressive president choosing its pursuit as a personal agenda. Sirin examines the drug policies of presidents from Richard Nixon to Barack Obama, and when discussing President Reagan, she gives him responsibility for the “punitive policies that disproportionately affected certain racial/ethnic groups” found in the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. She underscores his advocacy for federal mandatory minimum sentences, which created “the notorious 100 to 1 provision” under which five grams of crack cocaine carried the same prison sentence, five years, as 500 grams of powder cocaine. After explaining that crack cocaine users were typically poor and black, she notes that the resulting racial disparity in sentencing stayed in place until President Obama’s Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. Sirin clarifies that a progressive president will struggle without the legislature, judiciary, or public opinion, but she still holds that “most importantly, the president in office should have a progressive agenda to begin with in order to initiate and work towards key structural changes and policy reforms.” For this reason, according to her estimation, the president defines drug…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism and mass incarceration have had a deep connection since the start of the Clinton administration. Not to undermine the the incarceration efforts of previous administrations, but Clinton’s had a specifically terrible impact. Previous administrations- like Nixon’s and Reagan’s- used subtle contexts as a political strategy to win the votes from the south. After the rage left over from the loss of slavery, political leaders needed to find alternate ways to control minority groups, legally, to gain the southern vote. The Nixon administration coined with the idea of evil drugs being present in black and hispanic communities, persuading the American public that harsher laws should be taken to put these people in place. The Jim Crow laws…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What factors have led to increasing incarceration rates? How has this affected the United States economically and socially?…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the contributing factors of why blacks are more than likely to be sentenced a harsher sentence than whites is because of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 by President Ronald Regan on October 27, 1986. The act mandated a minimum five year sentence without a possibility of parole if the offender was in possession of five or more grams of crack and if in possession of five hundred grams of powder cocaine. Many supporters of the act argued that that crack offenders needed harsher sentences because the drug was highly addictive and is more associated with violent crimes (United States Sentencing Commission, 2010). This act was extremely troublesome for African Americans because eighty-five percent of crack offenders are African American while…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Domestic incarceration rate skyrocketed during Nixon’s presidency in 1971 when he declared the “War on Drug,” specifically targeting African Americans and Latino populations. Nixon himself along with other politicians such as Barry Goldwater and Nelson Rockefeller called “for harsh drug laws and severe criminal sanctions because they argued that a strong correlation existed between drug addictions and crime” (Cummings 418). Claims made by Nixon and other politicians became the focal point in the legislative branch in the 1970s, dismissing drug addiction as a public health issue rather than a criminal enterprise. During this time, Nixon established the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), which criminalized drug addiction and distribution. When Ronald Reagan took office, he criminalized drug addiction by passing the Anti-Drug Abuse Act in 1968; consequently, mass incarceration of nonviolent drug offenders from minority population took place in which sixty-five percent are African Americans and Latinos.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Our biggest problem in the United States is mass incarceration. We send more people to prison than any other nation in the world, and people of color make up more than 50% of incarcerated population. When the Thirteenth Amendment was passed, abolishing slavery it still gave leeway to some loopholes. The significant loophole in the Amendment was that, though: It stated that slavery and involuntary servitude are illegal, "except as punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted." So this loophole means I think that people who are imprisoned are technically considered the property of the state or federal government so they do not have rights, which is similar to the slavery time period.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the drug crime rates were not on the rise, the Reagan administration reminded the people that it was essential to remain tough on drug related crime. The government’s insistence on tougher drug crime legislation during a time in which drug crime did not appear to be exceptionally damaging to American society indicates a possibility that the war on drugs was more related to racial politics than it was related to drug abuse and…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nixon also made drug related crimes federal offenses. Convictions for mere possession resulted in felony prison sentences and more serious crimes like dealing or trafficking came with even longer sentences. However, the longer sentences imposed to lower crime had insubstantial effect on arrest rates and did not deter recidivism. Minimum sentences directed toward drug users developed as a result of Nixon’s initiative to significantly reduce crime rates by incarcerating drugs users. This initiative, coined by Nixon as the “War on Drugs,” failed its main purpose of eliminating drug use and significantly reducing the number of drug users.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits that were in placed to help African Americans were no longer there or they were hard to get. There were a certain amount of benefits in the African American communities that were limited to certain amount of people due to the restrictions the benefits had. Welfare was replaced with AFDC, which came with TANF, and TANF limits the amount of time you can use the benefits and restricted convicted felons with drug offenses from getting it (Alexander). This clearly is going to affect the Black communities, because if they can not get these benefits then they are going to go back on the streets to sell drugs, which is going to lead to jail. If the system wants to help people, then why put restrictions on the things they need. It seems as…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mass incarceration has many costs associated with it besides for the punishment of the offender. For many people, they have no idea how badly an incarceration can destroy someones entire life, and family. Mass incarceration affects everyone, the offender, their family, and the entire community as a whole. I believe that there are three major consequences and costs that are encored by mass incarceration, and they each effect either the offender, their family, or the seemingly unrelated community.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the mass mobilization of consciousness raising in the late 1960’s, the fight for democracy roared the elites to manifest into power through a global project which not only implemented policies to sustain global capitalism, but advocated for various systems that work to control society, as well as the future reality of certain communities. According to research done by the Department of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania, “Throughout American history, politicians and public officials have exploited public anxieties about crime and disorder for political gain” (Gottschalk). This includes the war on drugs and war on terrorism, which has sustained a movement of mass criminalization, in the name of public safety. However this safety has been a way to suppress those trying to challenge the status quo and reveal the true underlying which sparked the rise of mass incarceration.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The high rates of imprisonment among poor men reflect the effects of mass incarceration on the microlevel as well as the outcome of when law enforcement focuses on socioeconomic disadvantages in urban communities. Could it be that the criminal Justice system is deeply embedded in maintain poverty racially condense areas? Evidence shows mixed views of the social consequences of mass incarceration. This is due to the problem of invisible equality where those who are incarcerated are unavailable for social research, thus affecting statistics on severe economic disadvantage regarding mass incarceration. For one employment rates have decreased with the increase of incarceration rates. There is limited proof that mass incarceration undermines family…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the discourse of American politics, mass incarceration serves as a tool for the perpetuation of social inequalities and injustices against the poor. After a decade of unsuccessful discriminatory drug policies, there was a strong consensus among the public that called for reform in the criminal justice system. Consequently, District Attorney George Gascón filed a ballot initiative known as Proposition 47, which aimed to curtail the penalties for nonviolent and nonserious crimes. As Garson and William Lansdowne explained, the shifting political consciousness among the public shifted California’s outlook on capital punishment (Lagos 2013). Peoples yearn for social change, pushed California legislators to start reforming the criminal justice…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mass incarceration

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Hundreds of thousands of black men are unable to be good fathers for their children, not because of the lack of commitment or desire but because they are warehoused in the prisons, locked in cages. They did not walk out on their families voluntarily; they were taken away in handcuffs, often due to a massive federal program known as the War on Drugs.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    America land of the free and home of the great, But in all reality is America as great is…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays