The likelihood that conscientious authors get the high reward is immense, simply because some reviewers are better writers than others; this may come as a reality check, because everyone has a differing level of education - altogether this equates to a differing level of authorship. This also determines your rate also, and how you comment too. What's an unique selling point here is we all start off exactly the same, what transgress from there determines your skill, community spirit and ability to be proficient. From the off, I was warned by an astute member that high-end debaters and intellectuals were disfavoured, quite a statement to make when the site's tag-line was; 'for people with opinions;' suffice to state, it was the best piece of advice I received; My Dear X, I rapidly comprehended to achieve membership longevity depended on portraying a recalcitrant character. Paine's idiom: 'man has no property in man' aided my decade long journey of the premise no-one can modify individualism. Sometimes in regards to discourse with an individual, I came across the words 'we' and 'us' which implied a numerous 'few' perhaps a handful, alas, the few were notably nameless; an attempt to smuggle tribalism through, to mark up their credibility. I gathered, individualism was deemed obsolete, the closest thing smuggled tribalism represented was a collective political ideology; not dissimilar to the working patterns of a banned campaign group. My Dear X if you're fortunate enough to come across suchlike, you've hit gold... it'll energize you, teaches you to question the status quo, and your own writings, comment structure (s) and first-hand
The likelihood that conscientious authors get the high reward is immense, simply because some reviewers are better writers than others; this may come as a reality check, because everyone has a differing level of education - altogether this equates to a differing level of authorship. This also determines your rate also, and how you comment too. What's an unique selling point here is we all start off exactly the same, what transgress from there determines your skill, community spirit and ability to be proficient. From the off, I was warned by an astute member that high-end debaters and intellectuals were disfavoured, quite a statement to make when the site's tag-line was; 'for people with opinions;' suffice to state, it was the best piece of advice I received; My Dear X, I rapidly comprehended to achieve membership longevity depended on portraying a recalcitrant character. Paine's idiom: 'man has no property in man' aided my decade long journey of the premise no-one can modify individualism. Sometimes in regards to discourse with an individual, I came across the words 'we' and 'us' which implied a numerous 'few' perhaps a handful, alas, the few were notably nameless; an attempt to smuggle tribalism through, to mark up their credibility. I gathered, individualism was deemed obsolete, the closest thing smuggled tribalism represented was a collective political ideology; not dissimilar to the working patterns of a banned campaign group. My Dear X if you're fortunate enough to come across suchlike, you've hit gold... it'll energize you, teaches you to question the status quo, and your own writings, comment structure (s) and first-hand