The internal struggles and civil wars that surrounded World War II were far more intense than I previously imagined. I appreciate how the battle of communism versus democracy spread well beyond the Eastern European Theater, where it is more infamously known. Furthermore, Taylor’s insights into Chiang’s thought process surrounding his major decisions shed light on how the nationalist party leader considered all of the options but remained firm in his judgments. The Generalissimo provides a plethora of insights into the life of Chiang Kai-shek while simultaneously explaining the role of outside forces; this dynamic allowed me to acquire a comprehensive understanding of modern Chinese…
The 19th century of China opened with a broad reform of institutions, particularly in the military system. As a result, the revolution occurs and “followed by the breakup of China as the leaders of autonomous armies fought for power” (Dreyer 1). Kuomintang Party stood against the Communist Party and waged a massive civil war mainly in Northeast part of China, “ending only with the victory of communists on the mainland in 1949” (Dreyer 1). In the middle of the civil war, the aggression of the Japanese dragged China into the tragedy of the Second World War.…
Prescribed Subject 2: The emergence and development of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), 1946 to 1964…
The Communist Party in China also assisted the peasants greatly in the war against the…
In China between 1925 and 1950, the Chinese Communist Party was growing and taking over China with the support of the peasant class. The CCP allowed peasants a better life and was supported by the lowest class while higher class people like the landlords were chastised by the Party, and even with Japan occupying some parts of China, Communist ideas kept the peasant class strong enough to push the Japanese out. In the time leading up to the Chinese Communist Party taking over, Japan held power over parts of China. After World War I, Japan received Germany's spheres of influence. The Chinese people wanted to push the Japanese out and bring China to power.…
As Communist China strived to attract the peasant majority to fight against China it brought quite a lot of tension throughout the state. The attraction began in 1942 with a report from the Communist Central Committee implying that the peasants contribute to the basic strength of the Anti-Japanese War. That they must improve life for the peasants and grant more rights if they even wish to have them voluntarily fight for them.(DOC 5). A…
During the 20th century China underwent a massive transformation. In the early 1900s China was a mass of land lacking any real political cohesion and so was plagued by disputes between the many ruling warlords. However, by the year 2000 China was considered a major contender on the world stage and still is today; it almost seems certain that China will become the most powerful nation on earth in the next 50 years. This major transformation is seen to be a great success of China, considering the relatively short amount of time in which it was accomplished, but the question still remains as to whether entire credit should be given to China itself or instead whether China’s successful development was more due to the forced interference of foreign powers or, to a lesser extent, their influence rather than the inspired originality of Chinese politicians. The main stimulus for development certainly seems to be economic policy (either the respective leaders of China in their adaptation of foreign policy, sometimes brought about through influence, or the forced implementation of policy by foreign powers) with the consequent effect of this being development of the social and political workings of China.…
Another weakness of Stalin’s leadership, thus supporting the argument is that many of the most successful officers were purged under Stalin’s orders. This can mainly be attributed to Stalin’s paranoid personality; he was afraid of competition for leadership from the higher ranked officers and it was because of this he gave out the orders for them to be purged. This would support the argument that victory was in spite of Stalin as the Soviet government would have been much stronger had Stalin not ordered the officers to be purged. this is a particularly important factor contributing to the validity argument as it…
In October 1949, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) was established and led by Mao Zedong. China’s new communist leaders turned their backs on China’s traditional output (based on individual and small scale household production) economy and set out to create a massive socialist industrial government inspired by the Soviet Union. This idea introduced a model, which prioritize industrialization known as the “Big Push Model”. China started prioritizing investments into the heavy industry, which would reshape the Chinese economy and create a Command economy. Mao’s economic policies seemed be working in the earlier years of its development, but Mao soon became obsessed with Industrialization (and putting less priority on agriculture) and competing with the western world that his own personal power and self justifications became an obstacle for China’s development. Mao’s poor economic decisions for China became clear during the “Great Leap Forward” which caused and led the great Chinese famine. In this essay I will explore how Moa Zedong agricultural policies caused the great famine; firstly by analyzing the early years of the Big push development strategy and the new command economy (first five year plan), the Great Leap Forward (second five year plan) and its dramatic effects on China and lastly explaining how China could have potentially avoided this crisis.…
Although US intervention contributed greatly to China’s eventual victory in the Sino-Japanese war, the situation in China and the nature of the conflict was not massively affected by the contribution, and in reality the intervention had little impact on the internal affairs and overall success of the second United Front. Both before and after US involvement tensions were never relieved between the CCP and the GMD and so Japan remained a superior fighting force. Peace between the CCP and the GMD was regularly encouraged by foreign powers and in China in order to fight the Japanese, but if events such as the Xian Incident had not happened, or foreign powers had backed one party to take control. The country may have been much more united and in a greater position to fight the Japanese, but as it stands China’s contribution was not significant enough to account for Japan’s defeat, the conflicts nature did not change, and without the forced surrender of Japan China was on the way to losing the war.…
Most Chinese and Western views of the CR treat it essentially as a conflict of high (not local) elites, as a response to the concerns of a few people (not of many). Many explanations of this event fall into four types, relating it to (1) Chairman Mao's personality and cultural or political habits, (2) power struggle among high leaders, (3) ideal policies for radical development in an impoverished society, or (4) basic-level conflicts, induced by previous policies, of the sort suggested above. Let us examine these in order.…
The Chinese Revolution was among the first hot conflicts of the Cold War, and its ramifications were certainly among the most far-reaching. The most important long-term effect was to create a Communist state with the size and power to stand as a rival to the Soviet Union within the Communist world. The Soviets and Chinese were initially allies, but eventually split apart, and fought bloody border conflicts in the 1960s. The Sino-Soviet split forced many Communist states to choose sides, with China even invading pro-Soviet Vietnam in 1979.…
Being one of the most well-known characters of Chinese modern history, Mao Zedong has been constantly debated in both Western and Eastern worlds. Like all historic figures, Mao Zedong has been seen in different light: sometimes under glorification and reverence, and sometimes as a devil that dragged China into one of its darkest eras. These contradicting opinions can be easily seen in the assigned readings of this course. While Mao Zedong is generally praised for his military accomplishments during the overturning of the former government of the Kuomintang and the war against Japanese invasion, opinions differ when his ruling of China after 1949 comes into discussion. In some readings, he is most heavily criticized for the cruelty and aggressiveness he had posed on the Chinese people- to the extent that some even question whether overturning the Kuomintang was truly liberation for the Chinese people after all. In other readings, Mao Zedong is still seen as the great liberator of the Chinese people- the leader that brought China onto the tracks of modernization and great economic development. Although opinions about Mao Zedong differ greatly from person to person, there is no doubt that he is indeed a powerful figure in Chinese politics- in international politics even- and the influence his reign has on modern China still lives to this very day, for reasons and effects that are both good and bad.…
The Chinese civil war was one of the major conflicts in 20th century Asia. This conflict cost China approximately 6 million casualties (including civilians). Most fierce battles were fought after the Second Sino-Japanese War, which comprises the last 3 years of the Chinese Civil War (1946-1949). In this essay, we will focus on this period, by contrasting two rival sides, CPC (Communist Party of China) and forces loyal to the Kuomintang (KMT)-led government of the Republic of China. We will try to see the Communist’s strengths, as well as Kuomintang’s weaknesses to make a good analysis of the topic. We will discuss about the armies, foreign interventions and support made by people for…
On 1 October 1949, Mao Zedong, leader of the Chinese Communist Party declared victory over the Nationalist Party (Guomindang) and brought an end to four brutally long years of Civil War. The Communist victory in the Civil War has however, created significant debate among historians, namely: was a Communist victory inevitable and if so is it more sensible to see the Chinese Civil War as a Communist victory or as a Nationalist defeat?When researching these questions it becomes blatantly obvious that the Guomindang government led by Chiang Kai-Shek was riddled with problems and they are very much the cause of their own downfall. Widespread government corruption, spiraling inflation, loss of public confidence and intractable poverty are just a few of the failings the Guomindang afflicted upon the Chinese people. These monumental failings make a Communist victory seem almost inevitable, in that they just happened to be there to assume power as the Nationalists lost support and drowned in their own mistakes. In this sense it is more sensible to view the Civil War as a Nationalist defeat, rather than a Communist victory.…